Literature DB >> 19843285

Moderate and severe adverse events associated with apheresis donations: incidences and risk factors.

Shan Yuan1, Alyssa Ziman, Barbara Smeltzer, Qun Lu, Dennis Goldfinger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The goal of this observational retrospective study was to evaluate various donor and procedural variables as potential risk factors for different types of moderate to severe adverse events (AEs) during apheresis collections. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Data on all apheresis collections performed on Trima Accel (TA; CaridianBCT) instruments over a 28-month period were extracted from a donor database (Vista Information System, CaridianBCT) and reviewed along with AE reports from the same period. Donor and procedural variables were compared among uneventful procedures and those that resulted in various types of moderate to severe AEs, including presyncopal or syncopal (PS) episodes, citrate reactions (CR), reactions with both components (PS + CR), and self-reported incidents of significant venipuncture-related vascular injuries (VIs).
RESULTS: A total of 59 moderate to severe AEs occurred among 15,763 procedures (0.37%), including 19 PS, 4 CR, 17 PS + CR, 12 VI, and 7 miscellaneous reactions. Greater blood loss and lower net fluid balance were associated with PS; female sex, older age, and smaller total blood volume (TBV) were associated with CR; and development of VI may be associated with female sex and smaller TBV. Younger age was not a risk factor for AEs.
CONCLUSIONS: Apheresis collections performed by TA instruments are safe with a low incidence of significant AEs. Various types of AEs have different predisposing factors. Apheresis may be a safer option for donors with risk factors for PS reactions associated with whole blood collections, such as younger age, female sex, and small TBV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19843285     DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02443.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  17 in total

1.  Donor Hemovigilance during Preparatory Plasmapheresis.

Authors:  Ulrich Diekamp; Johannes Gneißl; Angela Rabe; Stephan T Kießig
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 3.747

Review 2.  A review of the haematopoietic stem cell donation experience: is there room for improvement?

Authors:  A Billen; J A Madrigal; B E Shaw
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 5.483

3.  Donor Safety in Haemapheresis: Development of an Internet-Based Registry for Comprehensive Assessment of Adverse Events from Healthy Donors.

Authors:  Hans-Gert Heuft; Eike Fischer; Tina Weingand; Thomas Burkhardt; Gerda Leitner; Hagen Baume; Jörg-Peter Schmidt; Andreas Buser; Gabriele Fauchald; Ute Reinicke Voigt; Behrouz Mansouri-Taleghani
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 3.747

4.  The effect of donor's characteristics on plasmapheresis products: insights for a personalised approach.

Authors:  Lucia Merolle; Chiara Marraccini; Filippo Vurro; Maura Parisi; Erminia Di Bartolomeo; Laura Bonvicini; Serena Broccoli; Paolo Giorgi Rossi; Roberto Baricchi; Thelma A Pertinhez
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 3.443

5.  Adverse reactions and other factors that impact subsequent blood donation visits.

Authors:  Brian Custer; Jorge A Rios; Karen Schlumpf; Ram M Kakaiya; Jerome L Gottschall; David J Wright
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 3.157

6.  Analysis of the Effect of Race, Socioeconomic Status, and Center Size on Unrelated National Marrow Donor Program Donor Outcomes: Donor Toxicities Are More Common at Low-Volume Bone Marrow Collection Centers.

Authors:  Bronwen E Shaw; Brent R Logan; Deidre M Kiefer; Pintip Chitphakdithai; Tanya L Pedersen; Hisham Abdel-Azim; Muneer H Abidi; Gorgun Akpek; Miguel A Diaz; Andrew S Artz; Christopher Dandoy; James L Gajewski; Peiman Hematti; Rammurti T Kamble; Kimberley A Kasow; Hillard M Lazarus; Jane L Liesveld; Navneet S Majhail; Paul V O'Donnell; Richard F Olsson; Bipin N Savani; Raquel M Schears; David F Stroncek; Galen E Switzer; Eric P Williams; John R Wingard; Baldeep M Wirk; Dennis L Confer; Michael A Pulsipher
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Donor neutrophil activation and transforming growth factor-β1 modulation induced by donor apheresis procedures.

Authors:  Massimo Ghio; Paola Contini; Filippo Ansaldi; Gianluca Ubezio; Maurizio Setti; Marco Risso; Gino Tripodi
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.443

8.  A Retrospective Analysis of Apheresis Donor Deferral and Adverse Reactions at a Tertiary Care Centre in India.

Authors:  Disha Arora; Ketan Garg; Ankit Kaushik; Richa Sharma; D S Rawat; A K Mandal
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-11-01

Review 9.  Performance-enhancing drugs: design and production of redirected chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells.

Authors:  B L Levine
Journal:  Cancer Gene Ther       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 5.987

Review 10.  Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy for the Community Oncologist.

Authors:  Marcela V Maus; Bruce L Levine
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-03-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.