Literature DB >> 19843199

Implementation of an electromagnetic imaging system to facilitate nasogastric and post-pyloric feeding tube placement in patients with and without critical illness.

E M Windle1, D Beddow, E Hall, J Wright, N Sundar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Artificial nutrition support is required to optimise nutritional status in many patients. Traditional methods of placing feeding tubes may incur clinical risk and financial costs. A technique facilitating placement of nasogastric and post-pyloric tubes via electromagnetic visual guidance may reduce the need for X-ray exposure, endoscopy time and the use of parenteral nutrition. The present study aimed to audit use of such a system at initial implementation in patients within an acute NHS Trust.
METHODS: A retrospective review was undertaken of dietetic and medical records for the first 14 months of using the Cortrak system. Data were collected on referral origin, preparation of the patient prior to insertion, placement success rates and need for X-ray. Cost analysis was also performed.
RESULTS: Referrals were received from primary consultants or consultant intensivists, often on the advice of the dietitian. Fifty-nine percent of patients received prokinetic therapy at the time of placement. Thirty-nine tube placements were attempted. Sixty-nine percent of referrals for post-pyloric tube placement resulted in successful placement. X-ray films were requested for 22% of all attempted post-pyloric placements. Less than half of nasogastric tubes were successfully passed, although none of these required X-ray confirmation. The mean cost per tube insertion attempt was 111 pounds.
CONCLUSIONS: This system confers advantages, particularly in terms of post-pyloric tube placement, even at this early stage of implementation. A reduction in clinical risk and cost avoidance related to X-ray exposure, the need for endoscopic tube placement and parenteral nutrition have been achieved. The implementation of this system should be considered in other centres.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19843199     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2009.01010.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Nutr Diet        ISSN: 0952-3871            Impact factor:   3.089


  10 in total

1.  Electromagnetic-Guided Bedside Placement of Nasoenteral Feeding Tubes by Nurses Is Non-Inferior to Endoscopic Placement by Gastroenterologists: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Arja Gerritsen; Thijs de Rooij; Marcel G Dijkgraaf; Olivier R Busch; Jacques J Bergman; Dirk T Ubbink; Peter van Duijvendijk; G Willemien Erkelens; Mariël Klos; Philip M Kruyt; Dirk Jan Bac; Camiel Rosman; Adriaan C Tan; I Quintus Molenaar; Jan F Monkelbaan; Elisabeth M Mathus-Vliegent; Marc G Besselink
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Endoscopic versus bedside electromagnetic-guided placement of nasoenteral feeding tubes in surgical patients.

Authors:  Arja Gerritsen; Thijs de Rooij; Marcel J van der Poel; Marcel G W Dijkgraaf; Willem A Bemelman; Olivier R C Busch; Marc G H Besselink; Elisabeth M H Mathus-Vliegen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Naso-enteric Tube Placement: A Review of Methods to Confirm Tip Location, Global Applicability and Requirements.

Authors:  S A Milsom; J A Sweeting; H Sheahan; E Haemmerle; J A Windsor
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  [Postpyloric feeding tubes for surgical intensive care patients. Pilot series to evaluate two methods for bedside placement].

Authors:  S Schröder; S van Hülst; M Claussen; K Petersen; B Pich; B Bein; T von Spiegel
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2010-11-06       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  Improving survival in decompensated cirrhosis.

Authors:  Amar Nath Mukerji; Vishal Patel; Ashokkumar Jain
Journal:  Int J Hepatol       Date:  2012-07-02

6.  Electromagnetic guided bedside or endoscopic placement of nasoenteral feeding tubes in surgical patients (CORE trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Arja Gerritsen; Thijs de Rooij; Marcel G Dijkgraaf; Olivier R Busch; Jacques J Bergman; Dirk T Ubbink; Peter van Duijvendijk; G Willemien Erkelens; I Quintus Molenaar; Jan F Monkelbaan; Camiel Rosman; Adriaan C Tan; Philip M Kruyt; Dirk Jan Bac; Elisabeth M Mathus-Vliegen; Marc G Besselink
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Clinical usefulness of capnographic monitoring when inserting a feeding tube in critically ill patients: retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jeong-Am Ryu; Kyoungjin Choi; Jeong Hoon Yang; Dae-Sang Lee; Gee Young Suh; Kyeongman Jeon; Joongbum Cho; Chi Ryang Chung; Insuk Sohn; Kiyoun Kim; Chi-Min Park
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 2.217

8.  A new strategy of enteral nutrition intervention for ICU patients targeting intestinal flora.

Authors:  Yangyang Guo; Ming Xu; Guangzhi Shi; Jindong Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 9.  Use of an electromagnetic-guided device to assist with post-pyloric placement of a nasoenteral feeding tube: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fabio Catache Mancini; Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura; Mateus Pereira Funari; Igor Braga Ribeiro; Fernando Lopes Ponte Neto; Pastor Joaquin Ortiz Mendieta; Thomas R McCarty; Wanderley Marques Bernardo; Sergio Carlos Nahas; Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2022-08-15

10.  Placement of a Jejunal Feeding Tube via an Ultrasound-Guided Antral Progressive Water Injection Method.

Authors:  Qing Zhang; Jian-Hua Sun; Jia-Tao Liu; Xiao-Ting Wang; Da-Wei Liu
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 2.628

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.