Literature DB >> 19843124

Effects of harvest of nontimber forest products and ecological differences between sites on the demography of African mahogany.

Orou G Gaoue1, Tamara Ticktin.   

Abstract

The demographic impacts of harvesting nontimber forest products (NTFP) have been increasingly studied because of reports of potentially unsustainable harvest. Nevertheless, our understanding of how plant demographic response to harvest is altered by variation in ecological conditions, which is critical for developing realistic sustainable-use plans, is limited. We built matrix population models to test whether and how variation in ecological conditions affects population responses to harvest. In particular, we examined the effect of bark and foliage harvest on the demography of populations of African mahogany (Khaya senegalensis) in two contrasting ecological regions of Benin, West Africa. K. senegalensis bark and foliage harvest significantly reduced its stochastic population growth rates, but ecological differences between regions had a greater effect on population growth rates than did harvest. The effect of harvest on population growth rates (Deltalambda) was slightly stronger in the moist than in the drier region. Life-table response experiments revealed that the mechanism by which harvesting reduced lambda differed between ecological regions. Lowered stasis (persistence) of larger life stages lead to a reduction in lambda in the drier region, whereas lowered growth of all life stages lowered lambda in moist region. Potential strategies to increase population growth rates should include decreasing the proportion of individuals harvested, promoting harvester-owned plantations of African mahogany, and increasing survival and growth by promoting no-fire zones in gallery forests. Our results show how population responses to harvest of NTFP may be altered by ecological differences across sites and emphasize the importance of monitoring populations over the climatic range in which they occur to develop more realistic recommendations for conservation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19843124     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01345.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  7 in total

1.  Implications from the Use of Non-timber Forest Products on the Consumption of Wood as a Fuel Source in Human-Dominated Semiarid Landscapes.

Authors:  Maria Clara B T Cavalcanti; Marcelo Alves Ramos; Elcida L Araújo; Ulysses P Albuquerque
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Experimental evaluation of the sustainability of dwarf bamboo (Pseudosasa usawai) sprout-harvesting practices in Yangminshan National Park, Taiwan.

Authors:  Chi-Cheng Liao; Chi-Ru Chang; Meng-Ting Hsu; Wak-Kim Poo
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Cork oak vulnerability to fire: the role of bark harvesting, tree characteristics and abiotic factors.

Authors:  Filipe X Catry; Francisco Moreira; Juli G Pausas; Paulo M Fernandes; Francisco Rego; Enrique Cardillo; Thomas Curt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Assessing the effects of multiple stressors on the recruitment of fruit harvested trees in a tropical dry forest, Western Ghats, India.

Authors:  Anita Varghese; Tamara Ticktin; Lisa Mandle; Snehlata Nath
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Transients drive the demographic dynamics of plant populations in variable environments.

Authors:  Jenni L McDonald; Iain Stott; Stuart Townley; Dave J Hodgson
Journal:  J Ecol       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 6.256

6.  Low interannual precipitation has a greater negative effect than seedling herbivory on the population dynamics of a short-lived shrub, Schiedea obovata.

Authors:  Lalasia Bialic-Murphy; Orou G Gaoue
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-11-26       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Response of a tropical tree to non-timber forest products harvest and reduction in habitat size.

Authors:  Orou G Gaoue; M'Mouyohoun Kouagou; Armand K Natta; Choukouratou Gado
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.