BACKGROUND: There are 2 once-daily, fixed-dose-combination, dual-nucleoside analogue tablets: tenofovir 300 mg-emtricitabine 200 mg (TDF-FTC) and abacavir 600 mg-lamivudine 300 mg (ABC-3TC). Which fixed-dose-combination tablet is more effective and safe is uncertain. METHODS: We compared TDF-FTC and ABC-3TC in a randomized, open-label, 96-week trial in which either fixed-dose-combination was substituted for current nucleoside treatments in human leukocyteantigen-B*5701-negative adults with human immunodeficiency virus loads <50 copies/mL. The primary end point was virological failure (consecutive viral load measurements >400 copies/mL, by intention-to-treat). Secondary end points included death, AIDS, adverse events, serious non-AIDS events, metabolic parameters, and body composition. We used exact statistics for differences in proportions, T tests to compare means, and Cox regression for hazard ratios. RESULTS:Of 441 patients who were screened, 357 were treated; 98% were men, the mean age was 45 years, 30% were receiving TDF, 20% were receiving ABC, and 24% were receiving a protease inhibitor. Virological failure was uncommon (5.6% for ABC-3TC and 3.9% for TDF-FTC; difference, 1.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.8% to 6.1%; P = .62). No participant developed AIDS, whereas 18 (5%) participants developed a serious non-AIDS event (rate, 2.79 events per 100 person-years; 95% CI, 1.76-4.43), of which 4 were fatal. TDF-FTC was associated with significantly fewer serious non-AIDS events than ABC-3TC (1.2 vs 4.8 events per 100 patient-years; hazard ratio [HR], 0.24; 95% CI, 0.08-0.73; P = .012), influenced mostly by a lower rate of cardiovascular events (0.3 vs 2.2 events per 100 patient-years; HR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.02-0.98; P = .048). TDF-FTC resulted in significantly lower bone mineral density (mean difference in hip t score, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.08-0.23; P < .001) but not in more fractures. CONCLUSIONS: In this population, TDF-FTC and ABC-3TC had similar virological efficacy, but ABC-3TC was associated with more serious non-AIDS events, particularly cardiovascular events. Clinical trials registration. NCT00192634 .
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: There are 2 once-daily, fixed-dose-combination, dual-nucleoside analogue tablets: tenofovir 300 mg-emtricitabine 200 mg (TDF-FTC) and abacavir 600 mg-lamivudine 300 mg (ABC-3TC). Which fixed-dose-combination tablet is more effective and safe is uncertain. METHODS: We compared TDF-FTC and ABC-3TC in a randomized, open-label, 96-week trial in which either fixed-dose-combination was substituted for current nucleoside treatments in human leukocyte antigen-B*5701-negative adults with human immunodeficiency virus loads <50 copies/mL. The primary end point was virological failure (consecutive viral load measurements >400 copies/mL, by intention-to-treat). Secondary end points included death, AIDS, adverse events, serious non-AIDS events, metabolic parameters, and body composition. We used exact statistics for differences in proportions, T tests to compare means, and Cox regression for hazard ratios. RESULTS: Of 441 patients who were screened, 357 were treated; 98% were men, the mean age was 45 years, 30% were receiving TDF, 20% were receiving ABC, and 24% were receiving a protease inhibitor. Virological failure was uncommon (5.6% for ABC-3TC and 3.9% for TDF-FTC; difference, 1.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.8% to 6.1%; P = .62). No participant developed AIDS, whereas 18 (5%) participants developed a serious non-AIDS event (rate, 2.79 events per 100 person-years; 95% CI, 1.76-4.43), of which 4 were fatal. TDF-FTC was associated with significantly fewer serious non-AIDS events than ABC-3TC (1.2 vs 4.8 events per 100 patient-years; hazard ratio [HR], 0.24; 95% CI, 0.08-0.73; P = .012), influenced mostly by a lower rate of cardiovascular events (0.3 vs 2.2 events per 100 patient-years; HR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.02-0.98; P = .048). TDF-FTC resulted in significantly lower bone mineral density (mean difference in hip t score, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.08-0.23; P < .001) but not in more fractures. CONCLUSIONS: In this population, TDF-FTC and ABC-3TC had similar virological efficacy, but ABC-3TC was associated with more serious non-AIDS events, particularly cardiovascular events. Clinical trials registration. NCT00192634 .
Authors: Andy I Choi; Eric Vittinghoff; Steven G Deeks; Cristin C Weekley; Yongmei Li; Michael G Shlipak Journal: AIDS Date: 2011-06-19 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Guinevere Q Lee; Suzanne McCluskey; Yap Boum; Peter W Hunt; Jeffrey N Martin; David R Bangsberg; Xiaojiang Gao; P Richard Harrigan; Jessica E Haberer; Mark J Siedner Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2017-10-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Manisha Desai; Vilija Joyce; Eran Bendavid; Richard A Olshen; Mark Hlatky; Adam Chow; Mark Holodniy; Paul Barnett; Douglas K Owens Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2015-04-22 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Kathleen Mulligan; David V Glidden; Peter L Anderson; Albert Liu; Vanessa McMahan; Pedro Gonzales; Maria Esther Ramirez-Cardich; Sirianong Namwongprom; Piotr Chodacki; Laura Maria Carvalo de Mendonca; Furong Wang; Javier R Lama; Suwat Chariyalertsak; Juan Vicente Guanira; Susan Buchbinder; Linda-Gail Bekker; Mauro Schechter; Valdilea G Veloso; Robert M Grant Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2015-04-23 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Heather J Ribaudo; Constance A Benson; Yu Zheng; Susan L Koletar; Ann C Collier; Judith J Lok; Marlene Smurzynski; Ronald J Bosch; Barbara Bastow; Jeffrey T Schouten Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2011-04-01 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Benjamin Young; Kathleen E Squires; Lisa L Ross; Lizette Santiago; Louis M Sloan; Henry H Zhao; Brian C Wine; Gary E Pakes; David A Margolis; Mark S Shaefer Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2012-12-05 Impact factor: 2.205