Literature DB >> 19842953

Multidisciplinary cancer conferences: exploring the attitudes of cancer care providers and administrators.

Nicole J Look Hong1, Frances C Wright, Anna R Gagliardi, Patrick Brown, Mark J Dobrow.   

Abstract

The multidisciplinary cancer conference (MCC) provides an outlet for contributors in cancer care collectively to evaluate diagnosis and treatment options and to provide optimal patient care. The prevalence and perceived benefits of MCCs in Canada have not previously been described. Between February and March 2007, the Cancer Services Integration Survey, including four key statements concerning MCCs, was administered to cancer care providers and administrators in Ontario, Canada. A total of 1,769 responses were received with a response rate of 33%. Overall, 74% of respondents were aware of MCCs within their region, but only 58% were either regular MCC participants, or acknowledged participation of cancer providers in their institutions. Using multilevel modeling, physicians (OR 2.69, p-value < 0.01, 95% CI 1.62-4.57) and surgeons (OR 3.00, p-value < 0.01, 95% CI 1.52-6.20) both perceived greater benefit of MCCs for coordinating and improving patient plans than administrators. Although MCCs appear to positively influence patient care and interprofessional interactions, variability exists among cancer providers and administrators concerning their acceptance and perceived benefits. Further research should concentrate on further probing these trends, and exploring explanations and solutions for the inconsistent acceptance of MCCs into routine cancer care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19842953     DOI: 10.3109/13561820902921829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interprof Care        ISSN: 1356-1820            Impact factor:   2.338


  8 in total

Review 1.  Multidisciplinary breast cancer teams and proposed standards.

Authors:  Sertaç Ata Güler; N Zafer Cantürk
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2014-10-20

2.  What do oncologists say about chemotherapy at the very end of life? Results from a semiqualitative survey.

Authors:  Deepti Behl; Aminah Jatoi
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.947

3.  How can diagnostic assessment programs be implemented to enhance inter-professional collaborative care for cancer?

Authors:  Anna R Gagliardi; Terri Stuart-McEwan; Julie Gilbert; Frances C Wright; Jeffrey Hoch; Melissa C Brouwers; Mark J Dobrow; Thomas K Waddell; David R McCready
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 7.327

4.  Experiences of hospital-based multidisciplinary team meetings in oncology: An interview study among participating general practitioners.

Authors:  Peter Pype; Fien Mertens; Jeanluc Belche; Christiane Duchesnes; Laurence Kohn; Marij Sercu; Myriam Deveugele
Journal:  Eur J Gen Pract       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.904

5.  Implementing a Multidisciplinary Tumor Board in the Community Practice Setting.

Authors:  Michele Lesslie; Jay R Parikh
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2017-10-17

6.  Use of the theoretical domains framework and behaviour change wheel to develop a novel intervention to improve the quality of multidisciplinary cancer conference decision-making.

Authors:  Christine Fahim; Anita Acai; Meghan M McConnell; Frances C Wright; Ranil R Sonnadara; Marko Simunovic
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Clinical audit of multidisciplinary care at a medium-sized hospital in Spain.

Authors:  Ana Ruiz-Casado; María Jesús Ortega; Ana Soria; Héctor Cebolla
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 2.754

8.  Strategies to improve the efficiency and utility of multidisciplinary team meetings in urology cancer care: a survey study.

Authors:  Benjamin W Lamb; Rozh T Jalil; Nick Sevdalis; Charles Vincent; James S A Green
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 2.655

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.