Literature DB >> 19842733

Outcomes of endovascular and open treatment for chronic mesenteric ischemia.

Jeffrey E Indes1, Jeannine K Giacovelli, Bart E Muhs, Julie Ann Sosa, Alan Dardik.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To measure contemporary practice patterns and compare outcomes of open and endovascular repair for chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI).
METHODS: The New York State Health Department Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database was queried for the ICD-9-CM codes for CMI for the years 2000 to 2006. In this time period, 6549 patients were evaluated for CMI in New York State. Of these patients, 666 received an intervention and underwent either open (n = 280) or endovascular (n = 347) repair; 39 patients underwent both treatments and were excluded. Trends in operative management and short-term outcomes were analyzed.
RESULTS: Over the 7-year study period, there was a steady increase in the number of endovascular procedures from 28% in 2000 to 75% in 2006. The overall mortality rate for the 7-year period was significantly lower for endovascular versus open repair (11.0% versus 20.4%, respectively; p = 0.0011). Endovascular repair was associated with a significantly lower rate of mesenteric ischemic complications compared to open repair (6.92% versus 17.1%, respectively; p<0.0001). Moreover, compared with open surgery, endovascular repair resulted in significantly lower rates of cardiac, pulmonary, and infectious complications (p<0.05). Only 37% of patients having open repair were discharged home compared to 55% of patients treated with endovascular procedures (p<0.0001).
CONCLUSION: The number of patients treated for CMI continues to increase and correlates with the increasing utilization of endovascular procedures. The patients undergoing endovascular treatment had fewer complications, lower in-hospital mortality, and a greater likelihood of being discharged home.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19842733     DOI: 10.1583/09-2797.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endovasc Ther        ISSN: 1526-6028            Impact factor:   3.487


  6 in total

1.  Chronic mesenteric ischaemia: 28-year experience of endovascular treatment.

Authors:  Ulku Cenk Turba; Wael E Saad; Bulent Arslan; Saher S Sabri; Stacey Trotter; John F Angle; Klaus D Hagspiel; John A Kern; Kenneth J Cherry; Alan H Matsumoto
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  [Management of complications after reconstruction of mesenteric arteries].

Authors:  Jürgen Zanow; Utz Settmacher
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 3.  [Endovascular therapy of chronic mesenteric ischemia].

Authors:  T Kölbel; S Wipper; H Diener; E S Debus
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Contemporary management of acute and chronic mesenteric ischemia: 10-year experience from a multihospital healthcare system.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Andraska; Lillian M Tran; Lindsey M Haga; Allison K Mak; Michael C Madigan; Michel S Makaroun; Mohammad H Eslami; Rabih A Chaer
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2021-11-14       Impact factor: 4.860

5.  The outcomes of prosthetic bypass grafting for chronic mesenteric ischemia.

Authors:  Emrah Oğuz; Serkan Ertugay; Rauf Yusifov; Cengiz Sahutoğlu; Hakan Posacıoğlu
Journal:  Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 0.332

6.  Two Decades of Experience With Chronic Mesenteric Ischaemia and Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome in a Tertiary Referral Centre: A Parallel Longitudinal Comparative Study.

Authors:  Sherif A Sultan; Yogesh Acharya; Mohamed Mustafa; Niamh Hynes
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-12-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.