Literature DB >> 19842493

Ice growth in supercooled solutions of a biological "antifreeze", AFGP 1-5: an explanation in terms of adsorption rate for the concentration dependence of the freezing point.

C A Knight1, A L DeVries.   

Abstract

It is widely accepted, and we agree, that the lowering of the temperature at which ice can grow in a water solution of one of the biological antifreezes is a result of adsorption of the antifreeze molecules at the ice surface. However, how this can produce a well-defined "freezing point" that varies with the solution concentration has remained problematical. The results of a series of measurements of ice growing in supercooled solutions of an effective antifreeze are reported and interpreted in terms of this fundamental problem. It seemed that the solution of the problem would have to rely upon adsorption rate, because that appeared to be the only way for the concentration in solution to be so important. The crystal growth results are most unusual, and appear to confirm this. The growth rates over a wide range of antifreeze concentration in solution (about 0.05 to 9 mg ml(-1)) are zero from the thermodynamic freezing point down to the "non-equilibrium" freezing point, where there is a very sudden increase to a plateau value that then remains about constant as the supercooling is increased by about 2 degrees C. The plateau values of growth rate are faster than those from pure water at the lower-supercooling ends of the plateaus, but slower at higher supercooling, until the growth rate starts rising toward that from pure water. These plateau values of growth rate increase markedly with increasing concentration of the antifreeze in solution. Along with these changes there are complex changes in the growth orientations, from c-axis spicules in the plateaus to those more characteristic of growth from pure water at greater supercooling. We conclude that the non-equilibrium freezing point is determined by the adsorption rate. It is the warmest temperature at which the ice growth rate on the basal plane (where the antifreeze does not adsorb) is fast enough to prevent the area of basal face on a growing ice crystal from becoming too small to grow, which is determined in turn by the adsorption rate on non-basal surfaces, which is proportional to the solution concentration. This mechanism answers the question of how the antifreeze stops growth rather than how it prevents growth, a subtle but important difference.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19842493     DOI: 10.1039/b821256b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys        ISSN: 1463-9076            Impact factor:   3.676


  12 in total

1.  Superheating of ice crystals in antifreeze protein solutions.

Authors:  Yeliz Celik; Laurie A Graham; Yee-Foong Mok; Maya Bar; Peter L Davies; Ido Braslavsky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Ice-binding proteins and the applicability and limitations of the kinetic pinning model.

Authors:  Michael Chasnitsky; Ido Braslavsky
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Crystal-plane-dependent effects of antifreeze glycoprotein impurity for ice growth dynamics.

Authors:  Yoshinori Furukawa; Ken Nagashima; Shunichi Nakatsubo; Salvador Zepeda; Ken-Ichiro Murata; Gen Sazaki
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Antifreeze protein hydration waters: Unstructured unless bound to ice.

Authors:  Sean M Marks; Amish J Patel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Microfluidic experiments reveal that antifreeze proteins bound to ice crystals suffice to prevent their growth.

Authors:  Yeliz Celik; Ran Drori; Natalya Pertaya-Braun; Aysun Altan; Tyler Barton; Maya Bar-Dolev; Alex Groisman; Peter L Davies; Ido Braslavsky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Blocking rapid ice crystal growth through nonbasal plane adsorption of antifreeze proteins.

Authors:  Luuk L C Olijve; Konrad Meister; Arthur L DeVries; John G Duman; Shuaiqi Guo; Huib J Bakker; Ilja K Voets
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Thermodynamic Analysis of Thermal Hysteresis: Mechanistic Insights into Biological Antifreezes.

Authors:  Sen Wang; Natapol Amornwittawat; Xin Wen
Journal:  J Chem Thermodyn       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 3.178

Review 8.  From ice-binding proteins to bio-inspired antifreeze materials.

Authors:  I K Voets
Journal:  Soft Matter       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 3.679

9.  Ice-binding proteins that accumulate on different ice crystal planes produce distinct thermal hysteresis dynamics.

Authors:  Ran Drori; Yeliz Celik; Peter L Davies; Ido Braslavsky
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  Molecular recognition of methyl α-D-mannopyranoside by antifreeze (glyco)proteins.

Authors:  Sen Wang; Xin Wen; Arthur L DeVries; Yelena Bagdagulyan; Alexander Morita; James A Golen; John G Duman; Arnold L Rheingold
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 15.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.