Literature DB >> 19842117

Ethnic differences in considerations whether or not to participate in prenatal screening for Down syndrome.

Mirjam P Fransen1, Hajo I J Wildschut, Ineke Vogel, Johan P Mackenbach, Eric A P Steegers, Marie-Louise Essink-Bot.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate ethnic differences in considerations whether or not to participate in prenatal screening for Down syndrome and to relate these to differences in participation.
METHOD: The study population consisted of 270 pregnant women from Dutch, Turkish and Surinamese (African and South Asian) ethnic origin, attending midwifery or obstetrical practices in the Netherlands. Women were interviewed after booking for prenatal care. Considerations were assessed by one open-ended question and 18 statements that were derived from focus group interviews. Actual participation was assessed several months later.
RESULTS: Women from ethnic minorities were less likely to participate in prenatal screening, which could be attributed to differences in age and religious identity. They more often reported acceptance of 'what God gives', low risk of having a child with Down syndrome and costs of screening as considerations not to participate in prenatal screening. They also reported many considerations in favour of participation, which did not differ from those of Dutch women but were less often consistent with actual participation in screening.
CONCLUSIONS: Women from ethnic minorities should not be stereotyped as being uninterested in prenatal screening, but should be better informed about the consequences of prenatal screening and Down syndrome. Copyright (c) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19842117     DOI: 10.1002/pd.2391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  5 in total

1.  "Don't Want No Risk and Don't Want No Problems": Public Understandings of the Risks and Benefits of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing in the United States.

Authors:  Megan Allyse; Lauren Carter Sayres; Taylor Goodspeed; Marsha Michie; Mildred K Cho
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2015

2.  Counselling for prenatal anomaly screening to migrant women in the Netherlands: An interview study of primary care midwives' perceived barriers with client-midwife communication.

Authors:  Isabel Koopmanschap; Linda Martin; Janneke T Gitsels-van der Wal; Jeanine Suurmond
Journal:  Eur J Midwifery       Date:  2022-05-19

3.  Pregnant Hispanic women's views and knowledge of prenatal genetic testing.

Authors:  Robin L Page; Christina Murphey; Yahyahan Aras; Lei-Shih Chen; Ryan Loftin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Explaining variation in Down's syndrome screening uptake: comparing the Netherlands with England and Denmark using documentary analysis and expert stakeholder interviews.

Authors:  Neeltje M T H Crombag; Ynke E Vellinga; Sandra A Kluijfhout; Louise D Bryant; Pat A Ward; Rita Iedema-Kuiper; Peter C J I Schielen; Jozien M Bensing; Gerard H A Visser; Ann Tabor; Janet Hirst
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Ethnicity and Language Proficiency Differences in the Provision of and Intention to Use Prenatal Screening for Down's Syndrome and Congenital Anomalies. A Prospective, Non-selected, Register-Based Study in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Ingrid A Peters; Kirsten M Heetkamp; Nicolette T C Ursem; Eric A P Steegers; Semiha Denktaş; Maarten F C M Knapen
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2018-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.