PURPOSE OF REVIEW: With highly active antiretroviral therapy, HIV-1 infection has become a manageable lifelong disease. Developing optimal treatment regimens requires understanding how to best measure anti-HIV activity in vitro and how drug dose-response curves generated in vitro correlate with in-vivo efficacy. RECENT FINDINGS: Several recent studies have indicated that conventional multiround infectivity assays are inferior to single cycle assays at both low and high levels of inhibition. Multiround infectivity assays can fail to detect subtle but clinically significant anti-HIV activity. The discoveries of the anti-HIV activity of the hepatitis B drug entecavir and the herpes simplex drug acyclovir were facilitated by single-round infectivity assays. Recent studies using a single-round infectivity assay have shown that a previously neglected parameter, the dose-response curve slope, is an extremely important determinant of antiviral activity. Some antiretroviral drugs have steep slopes that result in extraordinary levels of antiviral activity. The instantaneous inhibitory potential, the log reduction in infectivity in a single-round assay at clinical drug concentrations, has been proposed as a novel index for comparing antiviral activity. SUMMARY: Among in-vitro measures of antiviral activity, single-round infection assays have the advantage of measuring instantaneous inhibition by a drug. Re-evaluating the antiviral activity of approved HIV-1 drugs has shown that the slope parameter is an important factor in drug activity. Determining the instantaneous inhibitory potential by using a single-round infectivity assay may provide important insights that can predict the in-vivo efficacy of anti-HIV-1 drugs.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: With highly active antiretroviral therapy, HIV-1 infection has become a manageable lifelong disease. Developing optimal treatment regimens requires understanding how to best measure anti-HIV activity in vitro and how drug dose-response curves generated in vitro correlate with in-vivo efficacy. RECENT FINDINGS: Several recent studies have indicated that conventional multiround infectivity assays are inferior to single cycle assays at both low and high levels of inhibition. Multiround infectivity assays can fail to detect subtle but clinically significant anti-HIV activity. The discoveries of the anti-HIV activity of the hepatitis B drug entecavir and the herpes simplex drug acyclovir were facilitated by single-round infectivity assays. Recent studies using a single-round infectivity assay have shown that a previously neglected parameter, the dose-response curve slope, is an extremely important determinant of antiviral activity. Some antiretroviral drugs have steep slopes that result in extraordinary levels of antiviral activity. The instantaneous inhibitory potential, the log reduction in infectivity in a single-round assay at clinical drug concentrations, has been proposed as a novel index for comparing antiviral activity. SUMMARY: Among in-vitro measures of antiviral activity, single-round infection assays have the advantage of measuring instantaneous inhibition by a drug. Re-evaluating the antiviral activity of approved HIV-1 drugs has shown that the slope parameter is an important factor in drug activity. Determining the instantaneous inhibitory potential by using a single-round infectivity assay may provide important insights that can predict the in-vivo efficacy of anti-HIV-1 drugs.
Authors: T W Chun; L Carruth; D Finzi; X Shen; J A DiGiuseppe; H Taylor; M Hermankova; K Chadwick; J Margolick; T C Quinn; Y H Kuo; R Brookmeyer; M A Zeiger; P Barditch-Crovo; R F Siliciano Journal: Nature Date: 1997-05-08 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Joe Sasadeusz; Jennifer Audsley; Anne Mijch; Rachel Baden; Jose Caro; Hermeyone Hunter; Gail Matthews; Moira A McMahon; Susan A Olender; Robert F Siliciano; Sharon R Lewin; Chloe L Thio Journal: AIDS Date: 2008-05-11 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Moira A McMahon; Janet D Siliciano; Jun Lai; Jun O Liu; James T Stivers; Robert F Siliciano; Rahul M Kohli Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2008-09-24 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Scott M Hammer; Joseph J Eron; Peter Reiss; Robert T Schooley; Melanie A Thompson; Sharon Walmsley; Pedro Cahn; Margaret A Fischl; Jose M Gatell; Martin S Hirsch; Donna M Jacobsen; Julio S G Montaner; Douglas D Richman; Patrick G Yeni; Paul A Volberding Journal: JAMA Date: 2008-08-06 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Martin Markowitz; Bach-Yen Nguyen; Eduardo Gotuzzo; Fernando Mendo; Winai Ratanasuwan; Colin Kovacs; Guillermo Prada; Javier O Morales-Ramirez; Clyde S Crumpacker; Robin D Isaacs; Lucinda R Gilde; Hong Wan; Michael D Miller; Larissa A Wenning; Hedy Teppler Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2007-10-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Pin-Fang Lin; Beata Nowicka-Sans; Brian Terry; Sharon Zhang; Chunfu Wang; Li Fan; Ira Dicker; Volodymyr Gali; Helen Higley; Neil Parkin; Daniel Tenney; Mark Krystal; Richard Colonno Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2008-03-03 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: John M Cortez; Rafaela Quintero; John A Moss; Martin Beliveau; Thomas J Smith; Marc M Baum Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2014-10-13 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: John A Moss; Marc M Baum; Amanda M Malone; Sean Kennedy; Etana Kopin; Cali Nguyen; Josh Gilman; Irina Butkyavichene; Robyn A Willis; Kathleen L Vincent; Massoud Motamedi; Thomas J Smith Journal: AIDS Date: 2012-03-27 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Marc M Baum; Irina Butkyavichene; Joshua Gilman; Sean Kennedy; Etana Kopin; Amanda M Malone; Cali Nguyen; Thomas J Smith; David R Friend; Meredith R Clark; John A Moss Journal: J Pharm Sci Date: 2012-05-22 Impact factor: 3.534
Authors: Marc M Baum; Irina Butkyavichene; Scott A Churchman; Gilbert Lopez; Christine S Miller; Thomas J Smith; John A Moss Journal: Int J Pharm Date: 2015-09-16 Impact factor: 5.875