Literature DB >> 19841156

Effect of age, weight, and CYP2C19 genotype on escitalopram exposure.

Yuyan Jin1, Bruce G Pollock, Ellen Frank, Giovanni B Cassano, Paola Rucci, Daniel J Müller, James L Kennedy, Rocco Nicola Forgione, Margaret Kirshner, Gail Kepple, Andrea Fagiolini, David J Kupfer, Robert R Bies.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to characterize escitalopram population pharmacokinetics (PK) in patients treated for major depression in a cross-national, US-Italian clinical trial. Data from the 2 sites participating in this trial, conducted at Pittsburgh (United States) and Pisa (Italy), were used. Patients received 5, 10, 15, or 20 mg of escitalopram daily for a minimum of 32 weeks. Nonlinear mixed effects modeling was used to model the PK characteristics of escitalopram. One- and 2-compartment models with various random effect implementations were evaluated during model development. Objective function values and goodness-of-fit plots were used as model selection criteria. CYP2C19 genotype, age, weight, body mass index, sex, race, and clinical site were evaluated as possible covariates. In total, 320 plasma concentrations from 105 Pittsburgh patients and 153 plasma concentrations from 67 Pisa patients were available for the PK model development. A 1-compartmental model with linear elimination and proportional error best described the data. Apparent clearance (CL/F) and volume of distribution (V/F) for escitalopram without including any covariates in the patient population were 23.5 L/h and 884 L, respectively. CYP2C19 genotype, weight, and age had a significant effect on CL/F, and patient body mass index affected estimated V/F. Patients from Pisa, Italy, had significantly lower clearances than patients from Pittsburgh that disappeared after controlling for patient CYP2C19 genotype, age, and weight. Postprocessed individual empirical Bayes estimates on clearance for the 172 patients show that patients without allele CYP2C19(*)2 or (*)3 (n = 82) cleared escitalopram 33.7% faster than patients with heterogeneous or homogeneous (*)2 or (*)3 ((*)17/(*)2, (*)17/(*)3, (*)1/(*)2, (*)1/(*)3, (*)2/(*)2, (*)2/(*)3, and (*)3/(*)3, n = 46). CL/F significantly decreased with increasing patient age. Patients younger than 30 years (n = 45) cleared escitalopram 20.7% and 42.7% faster than patients aged 30 to 50 years (n = 84) and older than 50 years of age (n = 43), respectively. CYP2C19 genotype, age, and weight strongly influenced the CL/F of escitalopram. These variables may affect patient tolerance of this antidepressant and may provide important information in the effort to tailor treatments to patients' individual needs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19841156      PMCID: PMC3571021          DOI: 10.1177/0091270009337946

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0091-2700            Impact factor:   3.126


  34 in total

1.  Considerations in analyzing single-trough concentrations using mixed-effects modeling.

Authors:  Brian P Booth; Jogarao V S Gobburu
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.126

2.  Utility of sparse concentration sampling for citalopram in elderly clinical trial subjects.

Authors:  Robert R Bies; Yan Feng; Francis E Lotrich; Margaret A Kirshner; Steven Roose; David J Kupfer; Bruce G Pollock
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.126

3.  The pharmacokinetics of escitalopram after oral and intravenous administration of single and multiple doses to healthy subjects.

Authors:  B Søgaard; H Mengel; N Rao; F Larsen
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.126

4.  Fixed-dose trial of the single isomer SSRI escitalopram in depressed outpatients.

Authors:  William J Burke; Ivan Gergel; Anjana Bose
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.384

Review 5.  Treatment of anxiety and depression in transplant patients: pharmacokinetic considerations.

Authors:  Catherine C Crone; Geoffrey M Gabriel
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Do equivalent doses of escitalopram and citalopram have similar efficacy? A pooled analysis of two positive placebo-controlled studies in major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Ulla Lepola; Alan Wade; Henning Friis Andersen
Journal:  Int Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.659

7.  Escitalopram in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: double-blind, placebo controlled, flexible-dose study.

Authors:  Jonathan R T Davidson; Anjana Bose; Andrew Korotzer; Hongjie Zheng
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.505

8.  Unfilled prescriptions of medicare beneficiaries: prevalence, reasons, and types of medicines prescribed.

Authors:  Jae Kennedy; Iulia Tuleu; Katherine Mackay
Journal:  J Manag Care Pharm       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug

9.  Efficacy comparison of escitalopram and citalopram in the treatment of major depressive disorder: pooled analysis of placebo-controlled trials.

Authors:  Jack M Gorman; Andrew Korotzer; Guojin Su
Journal:  CNS Spectr       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.790

10.  Prevalence, severity, and unmet need for treatment of mental disorders in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys.

Authors:  Koen Demyttenaere; Ronny Bruffaerts; Jose Posada-Villa; Isabelle Gasquet; Viviane Kovess; Jean Pierre Lepine; Matthias C Angermeyer; Sebastian Bernert; Giovanni de Girolamo; Pierluigi Morosini; Gabriella Polidori; Takehiko Kikkawa; Norito Kawakami; Yutaka Ono; Tadashi Takeshima; Hidenori Uda; Elie G Karam; John A Fayyad; Aimee N Karam; Zeina N Mneimneh; Maria Elena Medina-Mora; Guilherme Borges; Carmen Lara; Ron de Graaf; Johan Ormel; Oye Gureje; Yucun Shen; Yueqin Huang; Mingyuan Zhang; Jordi Alonso; Josep Maria Haro; Gemma Vilagut; Evelyn J Bromet; Semyon Gluzman; Charles Webb; Ronald C Kessler; Kathleen R Merikangas; James C Anthony; Michael R Von Korff; Philip S Wang; Traolach S Brugha; Sergio Aguilar-Gaxiola; Sing Lee; Steven Heeringa; Beth-Ellen Pennell; Alan M Zaslavsky; T Bedirhan Ustun; Somnath Chatterji
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-06-02       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  17 in total

1.  Impact of age on serum concentrations of venlafaxine and escitalopram in different CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotype subgroups.

Authors:  Ragnhild Birkeland Waade; Monica Hermann; Hanne Lewis Moe; Espen Molden
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  A population pharmacokinetic model for escitalopram and its major metabolite in depressive patients during the perinatal period: Prediction of infant drug exposure through breast milk.

Authors:  Etienne Weisskopf; Monia Guidi; Céline J Fischer; Myriam Bickle Graz; Etienne Beaufils; Kim An Nguyen; Mathilde Morisod Harari; Sylvie Rouiller; Sophie Rothenburger; Pascal Gaucherand; Behrouz Kassai-Koupai; Cristina Borradori Tolsa; Manuella Epiney; Jean-François Tolsa; Yvan Vial; Jean-Michel Hascoët; Olivier Claris; Chin B Eap; Alice Panchaud; Chantal Csajka
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Pharmacogenetics of major depressive disorder: top genes and pathways toward clinical applications.

Authors:  Chiara Fabbri; Alessandro Serretti
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 4.  Escitalopram: in the treatment of major depressive disorder in adolescent patients.

Authors:  Lily P H Yang; Lesley J Scott
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.022

5.  Escitalopram population pharmacokinetics in people living with human immunodeficiency virus and in the psychiatric population: Drug-drug interactions and probability of target attainment.

Authors:  Perrine Courlet; Monia Guidi; Anaïs Glatard; Susana Alves Saldanha; Matthias Cavassini; Thierry Buclin; Catia Marzolini; Chin B Eap; Laurent A Decosterd; Chantal Csajka
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-07-07       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Application of a single-objective, hybrid genetic algorithm approach to pharmacokinetic model building.

Authors:  Eric A Sherer; Mark E Sale; Bruce G Pollock; Chandra P Belani; Merrill J Egorin; Percy S Ivy; Jeffrey A Lieberman; Stephen B Manuck; Stephen R Marder; Matthew F Muldoon; Howard I Scher; David B Solit; Robert R Bies
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 7.  PharmGKB summary: citalopram pharmacokinetics pathway.

Authors:  Katrin Sangkuhl; Teri E Klein; Russ B Altman
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  A Double-Blind Randomized Trial to Investigate Mechanisms of Antidepressant-Related Dysfunctional Arousal in Depressed or Anxious Youth at Familial Risk for Bipolar Disorder.

Authors:  Duncan C Honeycutt; Melissa P DelBello; Jeffrey R Strawn; Laura B Ramsey; Luis R Patino; Kyle Hinman; Jeffrey Welge; David J Miklowitz; Booil Jo; Thomas J Blom; Kaitlyn M Bruns; Sarah K Hamill Skoch; Nicole Starace; Maxwell J Tallman; Manpreet K Singh
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-06-20

9.  Citalopram for the Treatment of Agitation in Alzheimer Dementia: Genetic Influences.

Authors:  Matthew E Peters; Vijay Vaidya; Lea T Drye; Davangere P Devanand; Jacobo E Mintzer; Bruce G Pollock; Anton P Porsteinsson; Paul B Rosenberg; Lon S Schneider; David M Shade; Daniel Weintraub; Jerome Yesavage; Constantine G Lyketsos; Dimitri Avramopoulos
Journal:  J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol       Date:  2015-08-23       Impact factor: 2.680

Review 10.  Clinical applications of CYP genotyping in psychiatry.

Authors:  Edoardo Spina; Jose de Leon
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 3.575

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.