BACKGROUND: The MRI-compatible electrophysiology system previously used for MR-guided left ventricular electroanatomic mapping was enhanced with improved MR tracking, an MR-compatible radiofrequency ablation system and higher-resolution imaging sequences to enable mapping, ablation, and ablation monitoring in smaller cardiac structures. MR-tracked navigation was performed to the left atrium (LA) and atrioventricular (AV) node, followed by LA electroanatomic mapping and radiofrequency ablation of the pulmonary veins (PVs) and AV node. METHODS AND RESULTS: One ventricular ablation, 7 PV ablations, 3 LA mappings, and 3 AV node ablations were conducted. Three MRI-compatible devices (ablation/mapping catheter, torqueable sheath, stimulation/pacing catheter) were used, each with 4 to 5 tracking microcoils. Transseptal puncture was performed under x-ray, with all other procedural steps performed in the MRI. Preacquired MRI roadmaps served for real-time catheter navigation. Simultaneous tracking of 3 devices was performed at 13 frames per second. LA mapping and PV radiofrequency ablation were performed using tracked ablation catheters and sheaths. Ablation points were registered and verified after ablation using 3D myocardial delayed enhancement and postmortem gross tissue examination. Complete LA electroanatomic mapping was achieved in 3 of 3 pigs, Right inferior PV circumferential ablation was achieved in 3 of 7 pigs, with incomplete isolation caused by limited catheter deflection. During AV node ablation, ventricular pacing was performed, 3 devices were simultaneously tracked, and intracardiac ECGs were displayed. 3D myocardial delayed enhancement visualized node injury 2 minutes after ablation. AV node block succeeded in 2 of 3 pigs, with 1 temporary block. CONCLUSIONS: LA mapping, PV radiofrequency ablation, and AV node ablation were demonstrated under MRI guidance. Intraprocedural 3D myocardial delayed enhancement assessed lesion positional accuracy and dimensions.
BACKGROUND: The MRI-compatible electrophysiology system previously used for MR-guided left ventricular electroanatomic mapping was enhanced with improved MR tracking, an MR-compatible radiofrequency ablation system and higher-resolution imaging sequences to enable mapping, ablation, and ablation monitoring in smaller cardiac structures. MR-tracked navigation was performed to the left atrium (LA) and atrioventricular (AV) node, followed by LA electroanatomic mapping and radiofrequency ablation of the pulmonary veins (PVs) and AV node. METHODS AND RESULTS: One ventricular ablation, 7 PV ablations, 3 LA mappings, and 3 AV node ablations were conducted. Three MRI-compatible devices (ablation/mapping catheter, torqueable sheath, stimulation/pacing catheter) were used, each with 4 to 5 tracking microcoils. Transseptal puncture was performed under x-ray, with all other procedural steps performed in the MRI. Preacquired MRI roadmaps served for real-time catheter navigation. Simultaneous tracking of 3 devices was performed at 13 frames per second. LA mapping and PV radiofrequency ablation were performed using tracked ablation catheters and sheaths. Ablation points were registered and verified after ablation using 3D myocardial delayed enhancement and postmortem gross tissue examination. Complete LA electroanatomic mapping was achieved in 3 of 3 pigs, Right inferior PV circumferential ablation was achieved in 3 of 7 pigs, with incomplete isolation caused by limited catheter deflection. During AV node ablation, ventricular pacing was performed, 3 devices were simultaneously tracked, and intracardiac ECGs were displayed. 3D myocardial delayed enhancement visualized node injury 2 minutes after ablation. AV node block succeeded in 2 of 3 pigs, with 1 temporary block. CONCLUSIONS: LA mapping, PV radiofrequency ablation, and AV node ablation were demonstrated under MRI guidance. Intraprocedural 3D myocardial delayed enhancement assessed lesion positional accuracy and dimensions.
Authors: Gaston R Vergara; Sathya Vijayakumar; Eugene G Kholmovski; Joshua J E Blauer; Mike A Guttman; Christopher Gloschat; Gene Payne; Kamal Vij; Nazem W Akoum; Marcos Daccarett; Christopher J McGann; Rob S Macleod; Nassir F Marrouche Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2010-10-27 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Lei Qin; Ehud J Schmidt; Zion Tsz Ho Tse; Juan Santos; William S Hoge; Clare Tempany-Afdhal; Kim Butts-Pauly; Charles L Dumoulin Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2012-05-07 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Ehud J Schmidt; Maggie M Fung; Pelin Aksit Ciris; Ting Song; Ajit Shankaranarayanan; Godtfred Holmvang; Sandeep N Gupta; Miguel Chaput; Robert A Levine; Jeremy Ruskin; Vivek Y Reddy; Andre D'avila; Anthony H Aletras; Stephan B Danik Journal: Europace Date: 2013-09-06 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Parham Moftakhar; Prasheel Lillaney; Aaron D Losey; Daniel L Cooke; Alastair J Martin; Bradford R H Thorne; Ronald L Arenson; Maythem Saeed; Mark W Wilson; Steven W Hetts Journal: Radiology Date: 2015-06-01 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Charlotte Eitel; Gerhard Hindricks; Matthias Grothoff; Matthias Gutberlet; Philipp Sommer Journal: Curr Cardiol Rep Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 2.931
Authors: Matthias Grothoff; Matthias Gutberlet; Gerhard Hindricks; Christian Fleiter; Bernhard Schnackenburg; Steffen Weiss; Sascha Krueger; Christopher Piorkowski; Thomas Gaspar; Steve Wedan; Thomas Lloyd; Philipp Sommer; Sebastian Hilbert Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-08-23 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Ehud J Schmidt; Zion T H Tse; Tobias R Reichlin; Gregory F Michaud; Ronald D Watkins; Kim Butts-Pauly; Raymond Y Kwong; William Stevenson; Jeffrey Schweitzer; Israel Byrd; Charles L Dumoulin Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Ravi Ranjan; Eugene G Kholmovski; Joshua Blauer; Sathya Vijayakumar; Nelly A Volland; Mohamed E Salama; Dennis L Parker; Rob MacLeod; Nassir F Marrouche Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2012-10-15