M Funk1, C Lund, M Freeman, N Drew. 1. Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, World Health Organization, CH-1211 Genève 27, Switzerland. funkm@who.int
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To develop international guidance for improving the quality of mental health care in low- and middle-income countries. DESIGN: A panel developed recommendations based on a comprehensive literature review, consultation with over 100 experts from 46 countries and an analysis of international best practices. Recommendations A 5-pronged approach to improving the quality of mental health care is recommended. Quality improvement requires the alignment of policy and legislation with the attainment of good quality mental health outcomes. Key partners must be brought into the quality improvement process. Funding can be an important tool for promoting good quality but needs to be correctly aligned to meet policy objectives and to promote evidence-based interventions. Accreditation procedures and quality standards need to be carefully developed and resources allocated for their implementation. Finally, quality improvement must be brought into routine service management and delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Through a systematic approach to quality improvement, it is possible to ensure that the best possible interventions are provided within the constraints of each country and that the rights and well-being of people with mental disorders is optimally promoted. Quality improvement is not a luxury but an integral part of ensuring that the best possible services are provided to all who need them.
OBJECTIVE: To develop international guidance for improving the quality of mental health care in low- and middle-income countries. DESIGN: A panel developed recommendations based on a comprehensive literature review, consultation with over 100 experts from 46 countries and an analysis of international best practices. Recommendations A 5-pronged approach to improving the quality of mental health care is recommended. Quality improvement requires the alignment of policy and legislation with the attainment of good quality mental health outcomes. Key partners must be brought into the quality improvement process. Funding can be an important tool for promoting good quality but needs to be correctly aligned to meet policy objectives and to promote evidence-based interventions. Accreditation procedures and quality standards need to be carefully developed and resources allocated for their implementation. Finally, quality improvement must be brought into routine service management and delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Through a systematic approach to quality improvement, it is possible to ensure that the best possible interventions are provided within the constraints of each country and that the rights and well-being of people with mental disorders is optimally promoted. Quality improvement is not a luxury but an integral part of ensuring that the best possible services are provided to all who need them.
Authors: Jillian R Scheer; Abigail W Batchelder; Lauren A Bochicchio; Jeremy D Kidd; Tonda L Hughes Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2022-03-22 Impact factor: 3.928
Authors: Bahr Weiss; Victoria Khanh Ngo; Hoang-Minh Dang; Amie Pollack; Lam T Trung; Cong V Tran; Nam T Tran; David Sang; Khanh N Do Journal: Int Perspect Psychol Date: 2012-01