BACKGROUND: Pharyngeal gonorrhoea is common in homosexual men and may be important in maintaining community prevalence of anogenital infections. METHODS: From 2003, all participants in the Health in Men cohort of HIV-negative homosexual men in Sydney were offered annual pharyngeal gonorrhoea screening by BD ProbeTec nucleic acid amplification (NAAT) assay with supplementary porA testing. Participants self-reported diagnoses of pharyngeal gonorrhoea made elsewhere between interviews. Detailed sexual behavioural data were collected 6-monthly. RESULTS: Among 1427 participants enrolled, 65 study-visit-diagnosed pharyngeal gonorrhoea infections were identified (incidence 1.51 per 100 person-years, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.93) of which seven infections were identified on baseline testing (prevalence 0.57%, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.17%). Almost 85% of study-visit-diagnosed pharyngeal infections occurred without concurrent anogenital gonorrhoea. The combined incidence of study-visit-diagnosed and self-reported pharyngeal gonorrhoea (n=193) was 4.45 per 100 person-years (95% CI 3.86 to 5.12). On multivariate analysis, incident infection was associated with younger age (p-trend=0.001), higher number of male partners (p-trend=0.002) and reported contact with gonorrhoea (p<0.001). Insertive oro-anal sex ('rimming') was the only sexual behaviour independently associated with incident pharyngeal gonorrhoea (p-trend=0.044). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of pharyngeal gonorrhoea occurred without evidence of concurrent anogenital infection, and the high incidence-to-prevalence ratio suggests frequent spontaneous resolution of NAAT-detected infection. The association of pharyngeal gonorrhoea with oro-anal sex indicates that a broader range of sexual practices are likely to be involved in transmission of gonorrhoea to the pharynx than previously acknowledged. Screening the pharynx of sexually active homosexual men could play a role in reducing the prevalence of anogenital Neisseria gonorrhoeae.
BACKGROUND: Pharyngeal gonorrhoea is common in homosexual men and may be important in maintaining community prevalence of anogenital infections. METHODS: From 2003, all participants in the Health in Men cohort of HIV-negative homosexual men in Sydney were offered annual pharyngeal gonorrhoea screening by BD ProbeTec nucleic acid amplification (NAAT) assay with supplementary porA testing. Participants self-reported diagnoses of pharyngeal gonorrhoea made elsewhere between interviews. Detailed sexual behavioural data were collected 6-monthly. RESULTS: Among 1427 participants enrolled, 65 study-visit-diagnosed pharyngeal gonorrhoea infections were identified (incidence 1.51 per 100 person-years, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.93) of which seven infections were identified on baseline testing (prevalence 0.57%, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.17%). Almost 85% of study-visit-diagnosed pharyngeal infections occurred without concurrent anogenital gonorrhoea. The combined incidence of study-visit-diagnosed and self-reported pharyngeal gonorrhoea (n=193) was 4.45 per 100 person-years (95% CI 3.86 to 5.12). On multivariate analysis, incident infection was associated with younger age (p-trend=0.001), higher number of male partners (p-trend=0.002) and reported contact with gonorrhoea (p<0.001). Insertive oro-anal sex ('rimming') was the only sexual behaviour independently associated with incident pharyngeal gonorrhoea (p-trend=0.044). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of pharyngeal gonorrhoea occurred without evidence of concurrent anogenital infection, and the high incidence-to-prevalence ratio suggests frequent spontaneous resolution of NAAT-detected infection. The association of pharyngeal gonorrhoea with oro-anal sex indicates that a broader range of sexual practices are likely to be involved in transmission of gonorrhoea to the pharynx than previously acknowledged. Screening the pharynx of sexually active homosexual men could play a role in reducing the prevalence of anogenital Neisseria gonorrhoeae.
Authors: M Bissessor; S N Tabrizi; C K Fairley; J Danielewski; B Whitton; S Bird; S Garland; M Y Chen Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2011-09-28 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Kenneth H Mayer; Linda-Gail Bekker; Ron Stall; Andrew E Grulich; Grant Colfax; Javier R Lama Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-07-20 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: M Bissessor; D M Whiley; D M Lee; A F Snow; C K Fairley; J Peel; C S Bradshaw; J S Hocking; M M Lahra; M Y Chen Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2015-08-19 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Eric P F Chow; Sepehr N Tabrizi; Samuel Phillips; David Lee; Catriona S Bradshaw; Marcus Y Chen; Christopher K Fairley Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2016-07-13 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Mark Richard Stenger; Stefan Baral; Shauna Stahlman; Dan Wohlfeiler; Jerusha E Barton; Thomas Peterman Journal: Sex Health Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 2.706
Authors: Tiffany R Glynn; Don Operario; Madeline Montgomery; Alexi Almonte; Philip A Chan Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2017-05-22 Impact factor: 5.078
Authors: Lao-Tzu Allan-Blitz; Segundo R Leon; Claire C Bristow; Kelika A Konda; Silver K Vargas; Juan A Flores; Brandon J Brown; Carlos F Caceres; Jeffrey D Klausner Journal: Int J STD AIDS Date: 2016-07-10 Impact factor: 1.359
Authors: Nicole H T M Dukers-Muijrers; Julius Schachter; Genevieve A F S van Liere; Petra F G Wolffs; Christian J P A Hoebe Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2015-11-17 Impact factor: 3.090
Authors: Philip A Chan; Ashley Robinette; Madeline Montgomery; Alexi Almonte; Susan Cu-Uvin; John R Lonks; Kimberle C Chapin; Erna M Kojic; Erica J Hardy Journal: Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol Date: 2016-06-05