Literature DB >> 1984100

The fate of residual fragments after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy of infection stones.

E M Beck1, R A Riehle.   

Abstract

We reviewed 53 patients with infection stones treated by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL*) monotherapy to determine the long-term rate free of stones and the stone recurrence rate as correlated with the pre-treatment stone burden and the radiological presence of sand or fragments after the procedure. Long-term followup (mean 26.6 months) was available on 33 patients representing 38 kidneys. Although only 3 kidneys were free of stones immediately after ESWL, 20 were without stones at 3 months and 18 (47%) were stone-free at followup. Of 9 kidneys with fragments of more than 5 mm. after the final treatment 7 (78%) had residual fragments at 3 months and experienced stone progression. Of 9 kidneys with sand remaining 6 (66%) and all 3 kidneys that appeared to be free of stones after ESWL were without stones at followup. The 3-month plain film of the kidneys, ureters and bladder was a reliable indicator of eventual outcome. Of 20 kidneys that were free of stones at 3 months 16 remained without stones. Of 18 kidneys with residual stone particles at 3 months 14 showed disease progression, 2 had stable disease and 2 passed residual sand. Only 1 of 17 patients who were free of stones or had stable stone disease had a positive urine culture at followup. Patients with infection stone fragments 3 months after ESWL monotherapy have a high rate of stone progression (78%) and should undergo further treatment. ESWL monotherapy of infection stones requires close patient followup to assure that all residual fragments have passed and urine remains sterile.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1984100     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38230-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  15 in total

Review 1.  Treatment update on pediatric urolithiasis.

Authors:  T Esen; A Krautschick; P Alken
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  [Economic aspects of evidence-based metaphylaxis].

Authors:  W L Strohmaier
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  What is the fate of insignificant residual fragment following percutaneous nephrolithotomy in pediatric patients with anomalous kidney? A comparison with normal kidney.

Authors:  Bimalesh Purkait; Rahul Janak Sinha; Ankur Bansal; Ashok Kumar Sokhal; Kawaljit Singh; Vishwajeet Singh
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-05-06       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Lithoclast(®) Master in Intracorporeal Lithotripsy during Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy : Our Experience.

Authors:  R S Rai; Ksk Patrulu; R Rai; E Gupta; A Kayastha; S Sawhney
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

5.  Cystoman® and calculi: a good alternative to standard therapies in preventing stone recurrence.

Authors:  S Proietti; A Giannantoni; L G Luciani; G Sortino; P Graziotti; G Giusti
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Value of ultrasonography and helical computed tomography in the diagnosis of stone-free patients after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (USG and helical CT after SWL).

Authors:  Bora Küpeli; Serhat Gürocak; Lütfi Tunç; Cağri Senocak; Ustünol Karaoğlan; Ibrahim Bozkirli
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  Calyceal stones: fate of shock wave therapy with respect to stone localization.

Authors:  A Koşar; K Türkölmez; K Sarica; Y Z Müftüoğlu; O Gögüş; K Aydos
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  Clinically insignificant residual fragments after flexible ureterorenoscopy: medium-term follow-up results.

Authors:  Faruk Ozgor; Abdulmuttalip Simsek; Murat Binbay; Tolga Akman; Onur Kucuktopcu; Omer Sarilar; Ahmet Yaser Muslumanoglu; Yalcin Berberoglu
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  The effect of calcium channel blockers on stone regrowth and recurrence after shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Kemal Sarica; Yener Inal; Sakip Erturhan; Faruk Yağci
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2006-02-04

10.  Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Renal Pelvis Stones of 10-20 mm in Obese Patients.

Authors:  Babak Javanmard; Mohammad Reza Razaghi; Anahita Ansari Jafari; Mohammad Mohsen Mazloomfard
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2015-10-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.