| Literature DB >> 19840823 |
Ditte Marie Krohn Jensen1, Dongmei Cun, Morten Jonas Maltesen, Sven Frokjaer, Hanne Mørck Nielsen, Camilla Foged.
Abstract
Local delivery of small interfering RNA (siRNA) to the lungs constitutes a promising new area in drug delivery. The present study evaluated parameters of importance for spray drying of siRNA-loaded poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) nanoparticles (NPs) into nanocomposite microparticles intended for inhalation. The spray drying process was optimised using a statistical design of experiment and by evaluating powder characteristics upon systematic variation of the formulation parameters. Concentration, carbohydrate excipient (trehalose, lactose and mannitol) and the ratio of NP to excipient were varied to monitor the effects on moisture content, particle morphology, particle size and powder yield. The identified optimum conditions were applied for spray drying of siRNA-loaded nanocomposite microparticles, resulting in a product with a low water content (0.78% w/w) and an aerodynamic particle diameter considered suitable for inhalation. The use of mannitol in the formulation allowed a significantly lower moisture content than trehalose and lactose. The inclusion of 50% (w/w) or higher amounts of NPs resulted in a marked change in the surface morphology of the spray-dried particles. Importantly, the integrity and biological activity of the siRNA were preserved during the spray drying process. In conclusion, the present results show that spray drying is a suitable technique for producing nanocomposite microparticles comprising siRNA-containing PLGA NPs for potential use in inhalation therapy. Copyright 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19840823 PMCID: PMC7126878 DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2009.10.010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Control Release ISSN: 0168-3659 Impact factor: 9.776
Spray drying process parameters.
| Parameter | Level |
|---|---|
| Feed rate | 0.3 mL/min |
| Atomizing air flow | 473 L/h |
| Aspirator capacity | 70% |
| Inlet temperature | 45 °C |
| Approximate outlet temperature | 30 °C |
Outlet temperature measured between drying chamber and cyclone.
Formulation parameters included in the experimental design.
| Low level | Centre level | High level | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Concentration (mg/mL) | 10 | 20 | 30 |
| Ratio (w/w) | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.8 |
| Excipient | Mannitol | Lactose | Trehalose |
Total amount of carbohydrate excipient and NP in the feed solution.
Relative amount of NPs (by weight) compared to the total amount of dry substance.
Responses for optimization samples.
| Run no. | Formulation parameters | Responses | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excipient | Ratio | Concentration (mg/mL) | Yield (%) | Moisture content (%) ( | MMAD (µm) ( | Morphology | |
| 1 | Trehalose | 0.2 | 10 | 47.8 | 5.6 | 2.93 ± 0.05 | Smooth |
| 2 | Trehalose | 0.5 | 20 | 39.2 | 4.7 | 2.81 ± 0.24 | Raisin |
| 3 | Lactose | 0.8 | 30 | 45.5 | 2.1 | 3.07 ± 0.03 | Raisin |
| 4 | Lactose | 0.8 | 10 | 19.5 | 1.5 | 2.25 ± 0.08 | Raisin |
| 5 | Mannitol | 0.5 | 20 | 48.9 | 0.5 | 3.25 ± 0.06 | Raisin |
| 6 | Trehalose | 0.8 | 10 | 19.3 | 2.2 | 2.76 ± 0.15 | Raisin |
| 7 | Mannitol | 0.2 | 10 | 34.6 | 0.5 | 3.41 ± 0.02 | Smooth |
| 8 | Trehalose | 0.5 | 20 | 39.4 | 4.0 | 4.21 ± 0.05 | Raisin |
| 9 | Mannitol | 0.5 | 20 | 43.9 | 0.4 | 3.07 ± 0.10 | Raisin |
| 10 | Lactose | 0.5 | 20 | 33.0 | 3.7 | 2.73 ± 0.27 | Raisin |
| 11 | Lactose | 0.2 | 10 | 41.8 | 7.0 | 2.92 ± 0.05 | Smooth |
| 12 | Lactose | 0.5 | 20 | 36.7 | 5.0 | 3.55 ± 0.13 | Raisin |
| 13 | Mannitol | 0.8 | 10 | 31.2 | 0.5 | 2.54 ± 0.45 | Raisin |
| 14 | Trehalose | 0.8 | 30 | 46.1 | 2.2 | 3.90 ± 0.06 | Raisin |
| 15 | Mannitol | 0.2 | 30 | 56.4 | 0.5 | 4.84 ± 0.12 | Smooth |
| 16 | Mannitol | 0.8 | 30 | 42.4 | 0.4 | 3.28 ± 0.10 | Raisin |
| 17 | Lactose | 0.2 | 30 | 44.9 | 4.8 | 5.36 ± 0.56 | Smooth |
| 18 | Trehalose | 0.2 | 30 | 51.3 | 5.1 | 5.62 ± 0.10 | Smooth |
Relative amount of NPs ( by weight) compared to the total amount of dry substance.
Fig. 1SEM images of samples containing co-spray-dried NPs and lactose (total dry substance concentration: 10 mg/mL). A: ratio 0.2. B: ratio 0.5.
Fig. 2Contour plots showing the effect of parameters (yield, moisture content and particle size) on outcome, separated by excipient.
Statistical significance of formulation parameters.
| Moisture content | Particle size | Yield | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scaled estimate | Scaled estimate | Scaled estimate | ||||||
| Ratio | 0.0001 | − 1.21 | Ratio | 0.0023 | − 0.61 | Ratio | 0.0063 | − 6.06 |
| Mannitol | <0.0001 | − 2.36 | Concentration | 0.0005 | 0.77 | Concentration | 0.0016 | 7.71 |
| Lactose | 0.0003 | 1.20 | ||||||
| Trehalose | 0.0004 | 1.15 | ||||||
Fig. 3SEM image of siRNA-containing nanocomposite microparticles.
Fig. 4Lane 1, dsRNA marker; Lane 2, positive control; Lane 3, sample extracted from spray-dried particles; Well 4, sample extracted from spray-dried particles containing non-loaded NPs.
Fig. 5EGFP expression in H1299 cells after incubation for 48 h. A: Samples of extractions from nanocomposite microparticles (MP), lipofectamine 2000 (LF) was used as a transfection reagent for samples containing free siRNA. B: Samples of siRNA containing NPs not processed by spray drying and NPs redispersed from nanocomposite microparticles (MP) with and without the addition of lipofectamine 2000 (LF).