Literature DB >> 19840576

Comparison of impact of prenatal versus postnatal diagnosis of congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries.

Andrea W Wan1, Alexandra Jevremovic, Elif Seda Selamet Tierney, Brian W McCrindle, Elizabeth Dunn, Cedric Manlhiot, Rachel M Wald, John P Kingdom, Edgar T Jaeggi, Lynne E Nield.   

Abstract

Congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries (CCTGA) in the absence of major cardiac anomalies is thought to have a good outcome, although this has not been well documented. The objective of the present study was to compare the characteristics and outcomes of patients with a prenatal diagnosis of CCTGA to the characteristics and outcomes of those diagnosed postnatally. The optimal outcome was defined as intervention-free survival. All patients with CCTGA diagnosed prenatally and postnatally from 1999 to 2006 at 2 tertiary care institutions were reviewed. Patients with a single ventricle, heterotaxy, or valvar atresia were excluded. The differences between groups were assessed using the t test and chi-square test. A total of 54 patients (16 prenatal with 14 live born and 39 postnatal) were included. The patients diagnosed prenatally were diagnosed at a median gestational age of 20 weeks (range 16 to 37). Two deaths in each group were due to heart failure. The intervention-free survival rate for the prenatal and postnatal groups at 1, 6, and 36 months was 79%, 45%, and 30% and 85%, 61%, and 23%, respectively (p = NS). Of 37 patients, 14 (38%) underwent an arterial switch plus atrial baffling so that the morphologic left ventricle supported the systemic circulation, and 6 (16%) underwent repair of associated lesions so the morphologic right ventricle supported the systemic circulation; 4 (11%) of the 37 patients had pacemaker only. Prenatal patients with >1 fetal echocardiogram (12 of 14) did not have progression before birth. In conclusion, CCTGA has a >70% risk of intervention in the first 3 years after birth. The outlook is guarded and has an important effect on prenatal counseling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19840576     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.06.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  6 in total

Review 1.  Prenatal Counseling of Fetal Congenital Heart Disease.

Authors:  Caroline K Lee
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-01

2.  Postnatal Outcome Following Prenatal Diagnosis of Discordant Atrioventricular and Ventriculoarterial Connections.

Authors:  Thomas G Day; Tomas Woodgate; Olatejumoye Knee; Vita Zidere; Trisha Vigneswaran; Marietta Charakida; Owen Miller; Gurleen Sharland; John Simpson
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 3.  Efficacy of prenatal diagnosis of major congenital heart disease on perinatal management and perioperative mortality: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yi-Fei Li; Kai-Yu Zhou; Jie Fang; Chuan Wang; Yi-Min Hua; De-Zhi Mu
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 2.764

4.  Prenatal detection of critical cardiac outflow tract anomalies remains suboptimal despite revised obstetrical imaging guidelines.

Authors:  Heather Y Sun; James A Proudfoot; Rachel T McCandless
Journal:  Congenit Heart Dis       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 2.007

5.  Performance of different scan protocols of fetal echocardiography in the diagnosis of fetal congenital heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yifei Li; Yimin Hua; Jie Fang; Chuan Wang; Lina Qiao; Chaomin Wan; Dezhi Mu; Kaiyu Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Prenatal diagnosis, associated findings and postnatal outcome in fetuses with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries.

Authors:  Andrea Krummholz; I Gottschalk; A Geipel; U Herberg; C Berg; U Gembruch; A Hellmund
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 2.344

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.