Literature DB >> 19840137

Has pay-for-performance decreased access for minority patients?

Andrew M Ryan1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether the CMS and Premier Inc. Hospital Quality Incentive Demonstration (PHQID), a hospital-based pay-for-performance (P4P) and public quality reporting program, caused participating hospitals (1) to avoid treating minority patients diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure, and pneumonia and (2) to avoid providing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) to minority patients diagnosed with AMI. DATA SOURCES: One hundred percent Medicare inpatient claims, denominator files, and provider of service files from 2000 to 2006. STUDY
DESIGN: We test for differences in the conditional probability of receiving care at PHQID hospitals for AMI, heart failure, and pneumonia before and after implementation of the PHQID between white and minority patients. We also test for differences in the conditional probability that white and minority patients diagnosed with AMI receive CABG in hospitals participating, and not participating, in the PHQID before and after the implementation of the PHQID. DATA EXTRACTION
METHODS: Data were obtained from CMS. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: We find little evidence that the PHQID reduced access for minority patients: only "Other Race" beneficiaries had a significant reduction in adjusted admissions to PHQID hospitals in the postperiod, and only for AMI. Only marginally significant ( p<.10) evidence of a reduction in CABG was found, also occurring for Other Race beneficiaries.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite minimal evidence of minority patient avoidance in the PHQID, monitoring of avoidance should continue for P4P programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19840137      PMCID: PMC2813434          DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01050.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  31 in total

Review 1.  Physician response to fee changes with multiple payers.

Authors:  T G McGuire; M V Pauly
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Multitasking and mixed systems for provider payment.

Authors:  Karen Eggleston
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 3.  Economic incentives and physicians' delivery of preventive care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Robert Town; Robert Kane; Paul Johnson; Mary Butler
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 4.  What is the empirical basis for paying for quality in health care?

Authors:  Meredith B Rosenthal; Richard G Frank
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.929

Review 5.  Does pay-for-performance improve the quality of health care?

Authors:  Laura A Petersen; LeChauncy D Woodard; Tracy Urech; Christina Daw; Supicha Sookanan
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Racial profiling: the unintended consequences of coronary artery bypass graft report cards.

Authors:  Rachel M Werner; David A Asch; Daniel Polsky
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 7.  Do cardiac surgery report cards reduce mortality? Assessing the evidence.

Authors:  Andrew J Epstein
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.929

8.  The influence of public reporting of outcome data on medical decision making by physicians.

Authors:  Craig R Narins; Ann M Dozier; Frederick S Ling; Wojciech Zareba
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005-01-10

9.  Pay-for-performance programs in family practices in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Tim Doran; Catherine Fullwood; Hugh Gravelle; David Reeves; Evangelos Kontopantelis; Urara Hiroeh; Martin Roland
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-07-27       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  More accurate racial and ethnic codes for Medicare administrative data.

Authors:  Celia Eicheldinger; Arthur Bonito
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  2008
View more
  22 in total

1.  Can incentives to improve quality reduce disparities?

Authors:  Karen Ho; Ernest Moy; Carolyn M Clancy
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  The Quality of Surgical and Pneumonia Care in Minority-Serving and Racially Integrated Hospitals.

Authors:  Darrell J Gaskin; Hossein Zare; Adil H Haider; Thomas A LaVeist
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Measuring Success in Health Care Value-Based Purchasing Programs: Findings from an Environmental Scan, Literature Review, and Expert Panel Discussions.

Authors:  Cheryl L Damberg; Melony E Sorbero; Susan L Lovejoy; Grant R Martsolf; Laura Raaen; Daniel Mandel
Journal:  Rand Health Q       Date:  2014-12-30

4.  Moderating Effects of Patient Characteristics on the Impact of Financial Incentives.

Authors:  Meredith B Rosenthal; Andrea B Troxel; Kevin G Volpp; Walter F Stewart; Thomas D Sequist; James B Jones; AnneMarie G Hirsch; Karen Hoffer; Jingsan Zhu; Wenli Wang; Amanda Hodlofski; Darra Finnerty; Jack J Huang; David A Asch
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 3.929

5.  Impact of a Pay-for-Performance Program on Care for Black Patients with Hypertension: Important Answers in the Era of the Affordable Care Act.

Authors:  Laura A Petersen; Kate Simpson Ramos; Kenneth Pietz; LeChauncy D Woodard
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  A comparison of methods for health policy evaluation with controlled pre-post designs.

Authors:  Stephen O'Neill; Noemi Kreif; Matt Sutton; Richard Grieve
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Medicare readmissions policies and racial and ethnic health disparities: a cautionary tale.

Authors:  Matthew D McHugh; J Margo Brooks Carthon; Xiao L Kang
Journal:  Policy Polit Nurs Pract       Date:  2010-11

8.  Pay for obesity? Pay-for-performance metrics neglect increased complication rates and cost for obese patients.

Authors:  Kenzo Hirose; Andrew D Shore; Elizabeth C Wick; Jonathan P Weiner; Martin A Makary
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 9.  Pay-for-Performance: Disappointing Results or Masked Heterogeneity?

Authors:  Adam A Markovitz; Andrew M Ryan
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.929

10.  Patients' views on pay for performance in France: a qualitative study in primary care.

Authors:  Olivier Saint-Lary; Claire Leroux; Cécile Dubourdieu; Cécile Fournier; Irène François-Purssell
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.386

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.