Literature DB >> 19839875

Social participation through the eyes of people with aphasia.

Ruth J P Dalemans1, Luc de Witte, Derick Wade, Wim van den Heuvel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the way people with aphasia perceive their social participation and its influencing factors. AIMS: To explore how people with aphasia perceive participation in society and to investigate influencing factors. METHODS & PROCEDURES: In this qualitative study thirteen persons with aphasia and twelve central caregivers kept a pre-structured diary over two weeks, followed by a semi-structured interview. Diaries and interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed by two researchers independently using codes, categories and central themes inductively. Plausibility of the analyses was discussed several times with a third independent senior-researcher. In a focus group interview, the results were discussed with the participants. OUTCOMES &
RESULTS: The number of social activities and the character of these activities are not as important as the perceived engagement in the social activities for the participants. People with aphasia feel isolated but want to feel engaged. They feel burdensome to others and wish to function in an ordinary way. Extracting information from conversations is difficult but they want to know what is going on. Often they are not able to work and they wish to contribute to the community in other ways. Although they often feel stigmatized, they wish to be respected. Often they do not reach that goal. Perceived factors influencing engagement in social participation can be divided into personal, social and environmental factors. The following personal factors are reported: motivation, physical and psychological condition and communication skills. The social factors are: the role of the central caregiver and the characteristics of the communication partner(s), namely willingness, skills and knowledge. The environmental factors refer to quietness and familiarity of the place in which the person with aphasia live.
CONCLUSIONS: Social participation is a theoretical concept that people with aphasia do not use. Instead, people speak in terms of engagement, involvement, having a feeling of belonging. People with aphasia describe the degree of engagement in activities in social life domains (i.e. the quality of activities) as more important than the quantity of performing activities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19839875     DOI: 10.3109/13682820903223633

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Lang Commun Disord        ISSN: 1368-2822            Impact factor:   3.020


  25 in total

Review 1.  Intensity of aphasia therapy: evidence and efficacy.

Authors:  Leora R Cherney; Janet P Patterson; Anastasia M Raymer
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.081

2.  What's on Your Mind? Conversation Topics Chosen by People With Degenerative Cognitive-Linguistic Disorders for Communication Boards.

Authors:  Melanie Fried-Oken; Darlene Daniels; Olivia Ettinger; Aimee Mooney; Glory Noethe; Charity Rowland
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.408

3.  Achieving Participation-Focused Intervention Through Shared Decision Making: Proposal of an Age- and Disorder-Generic Framework.

Authors:  Carolyn Baylor; Meghan Darling-White
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 2.408

4.  Barriers to and Facilitators of Access and Participation in Community-Based Exercise Programmes from the Perspective of Adults with Post-stroke Aphasia.

Authors:  Diane C Blonski; Megan Covert; Roxanne Gauthier; Alanna Monas; Danielle Murray; Kelly K O'Brien; Anita Debbie Mendelson; Maria Huijbregts
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.037

5.  Effects of Written, Auditory, and Combined Modalities on Comprehension by People With Aphasia.

Authors:  Kelly Knollman-Porter; Sarah E Wallace; Jessica A Brown; Karen Hux; Brielle L Hoagland; Darbi R Ruff
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 2.408

6.  Complexity of Participation Post-Stroke: Longitudinal Assessment of Community Participation, Positive Affect, Social Support and Functional Independence.

Authors:  Sameer A Ashaie; Nichol Castro
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Relationship between perceived social support and patient-reported communication outcomes across communication disorders: a systematic review.

Authors:  Tanya Eadie; Mara Kapsner-Smith; Susan Bolt; Cara Sauder; Kathryn Yorkston; Carolyn Baylor
Journal:  Int J Lang Commun Disord       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 3.020

8.  Facilitators of and Barriers to Providing Access to Community-Based Exercise Programmes for Adults with Post-Stroke Aphasia from the Perspective of Programme Representatives.

Authors:  Meredith Fairbairn; Emily Wicks; Sabrina Ait-Ouali; Olivia Drodge; Dina Brooks; Maria Huijbregts; Diane Blonski
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 1.037

9.  Validating the Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB) for use with people with aphasia: an analysis of Differential Item Function (DIF).

Authors:  Carolyn Baylor; Megan Oelke; Alyssa Bamer; Eileen Hunsaker; Catherine Off; Sarah E Wallace; Suzanne Pennington; Diane Kendall; Kathryn Yorkston
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 2.773

10.  Diagnosing and managing post-stroke aphasia.

Authors:  Shannon M Sheppard; Rajani Sebastian
Journal:  Expert Rev Neurother       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 4.618

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.