Literature DB >> 19839705

Stimulus dynamics and temporal discrimination: implications for pacemakers.

Joshua S Beckmann1, Michael E Young.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to observe the functional relationship between stimulus dynamics and stimulus duration judgments in humans. Stimulus duration was defined as the length of time that a spinning sphere appeared on a computer screen. Stimulus dynamics were defined by how quickly the sphere rotated on its y-axis. Using a logarithmic scale, a psychophysical bisection task was used to divide stimulus durations into two categories, short and long. Across three experiments, participants' duration judgments were longer the faster the sphere was rotated. This effect was observed over both a long and short temporal scale and over a wide range of stimulus dynamics despite the fact that the reinforcement contingencies penalized participants for this effect. The results are discussed in terms of perceived change as the possible basis of temporal duration estimation. This hypothesis was investigated through applications of the leading quantitative models of temporal discrimination to the present data. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19839705     DOI: 10.1037/a0015891

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  12 in total

1.  Life motion signals lengthen perceived temporal duration.

Authors:  Li Wang; Yi Jiang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A model of multisecond timing behaviour under peak-interval procedures.

Authors:  Takayuki Hasegawa; Shogo Sakata
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-25       Impact factor: 1.621

3.  An Information Theoretic Approach to Model Selection: A Tutorial with Monte Carlo Confirmation.

Authors:  M Christopher Newland
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2019-06-19

4.  Toward isolating the role of dopamine in the acquisition of incentive salience attribution.

Authors:  Jonathan J Chow; Justin R Nickell; Mahesh Darna; Joshua S Beckmann
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 5.250

5.  Changes in fentanyl demand following naltrexone, morphine, and buprenorphine in male rats.

Authors:  Lindsey R Hammerslag; Rebecca S Hofford; Qiwen Kang; Richard J Kryscio; Joshua S Beckmann; Michael T Bardo
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 4.492

6.  Stimulus repetition and the perception of time: the effects of prior exposure on temporal discrimination, judgment, and production.

Authors:  William J Matthews
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Isolating the incentive salience of reward-associated stimuli: value, choice, and persistence.

Authors:  Joshua S Beckmann; Jonathan J Chow
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 2.460

8.  Do changes in the pace of events affect one-off judgments of duration?

Authors:  Hannah M Darlow; Alexandra S Dylman; Ana I Gheorghiu; William J Matthews
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  How long did it last? You would better ask a human.

Authors:  Francesco Lacquaniti; Mauro Carrozzo; Andrea d'Avella; Barbara La Scaleia; Alessandro Moscatelli; Myrka Zago
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  Time perception and dynamics of facial expressions of emotions.

Authors:  Sophie L Fayolle; Sylvie Droit-Volet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.