Literature DB >> 1983922

Reporting of occupational injury and illness in the semiconductor manufacturing industry.

S A McCurdy1, M B Schenker, S J Samuels.   

Abstract

In the United States, occupational illness and injury cases meeting specific reporting criteria are recorded on company Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) 200 logs; case description data are submitted to participating state agencies for coding and entry in the national Supplementary Data System (SDS). We evaluated completeness of reporting (the percentage of reportable cases that were recorded in the company OSHA 200 log) in the semiconductor manufacturing industry by reviewing company health clinic records for 1984 of 10 manufacturing sites of member companies of a national semiconductor manufacturing industry trade association. Of 416 randomly selected work-related cases, 101 met OSHA reporting criteria. Reporting completeness was 60 percent and was lowest for occupational illnesses (44 percent). Case-description data from 150 reported cases were submitted twice to state coding personnel to evaluate coding reliability. Reliability was high (kappa 0.82-0.93) for "nature," "affected body part," "source," and "type" variables. Coding for the SDS appears reliable; reporting completeness may be improved by use of a stepwise approach by company personnel responsible for reporting decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1983922      PMCID: PMC1404938          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.81.1.85

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  7 in total

1.  Occupational disease surveillance with existing data sources.

Authors:  J M Melius; J P Sestito; P J Seligman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Semiconductor manufacturing: an introduction to processes and hazards.

Authors:  P H Wald; J R Jones
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.214

3.  Improving the surveillance of occupational disease.

Authors:  P J Landrigan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  The role of occupational health clinics in surveillance of occupational disease.

Authors:  L Welch
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Occupational illness: case detection by poison control surveillance.

Authors:  P D Blanc; D Rempel; N Maizlish; P Hiatt; K R Olson
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1989-08-01       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Counting recognized occupational deaths in the United States.

Authors:  A Suruda; E A Emmett
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1988-11

7.  Occupational injury and illness in the semiconductor manufacturing industry.

Authors:  S A McCurdy; M B Schenker; D V Lassiter
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.214

  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  Occupational injury and illness surveillance: conceptual filters explain underreporting.

Authors:  Lenore S Azaroff; Charles Levenstein; David H Wegman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  An evaluation of hospital discharge records as a tool for serious work related injury surveillance.

Authors:  H Alamgir; M Koehoorn; A Ostry; E Tompa; P Demers
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Comparison of data sources for the surveillance of work injury.

Authors:  Cameron A Mustard; Andrea Chambers; Christopher McLeod; Amber Bielecky; Peter M Smith
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 4.402

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.