Literature DB >> 1983901

Validation of the physical activity instrument for the Life in New Zealand national survey.

W G Hopkins1, N C Wilson, D G Russell.   

Abstract

A physical activity recall instrument suitable for self-administration by the adult New Zealand population was devised and validated for 140 subjects selected randomly from urban electoral rolls. Validation used bootstrapping to compare correlations between subjective measures derived from the instrument, the Stanford 7-day recall questionnaire and other questionnaires, and objective measures derived from an exercise test. Subjective measures were grouped as measures of high intensity activity, low intensity activity, or total activity metabolism. The high intensity measures correlated moderately with each other (mean r = 0.39), but poorly with metabolism and low intensity measures (r = 0.16, -0.02, respectively). The mean correlation between the metabolism and low intensity groups (r = 0.26) was similar to those within these groups (r = 0.31, 0.25, respectively). Thus, the high intensity measures formed a group distinct from the metabolism and low intensity groups, which represented similar measures. The objective measures that correlated with high intensity measures (mean r = 0.25) are predominantly recognized risk factors for cardiovascular disease; these did not correlate with the metabolism or low intensity measures (mean r = 0.03, -0.07, respectively). Activity measures from the instrument had mean correlations with subjective and objective measures that equaled or surpassed those of the Stanford measures from the same group. The authors conclude that 1) population health studies that assay physical activity should include well-defined measures of high intensity activity, and 2) valid measures of physical activity in the New Zealand population are achievable with this instrument.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1983901     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115805

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  7 in total

Review 1.  Limits to the measurement of habitual physical activity by questionnaires.

Authors:  R J Shephard
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  The association between aerobic fitness and physical activity in children and adolescents: the European youth heart study.

Authors:  Peter Lund Kristensen; Niels Christian Moeller; Lars Korsholm; Elin Kolle; Niels Wedderkopp; Karsten Froberg; Lars Bo Andersen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 3.  Physical activity questionnaires for adults: a systematic review of measurement properties.

Authors:  Mireille N M van Poppel; Mai J M Chinapaw; Lidwine B Mokkink; Willem van Mechelen; Caroline B Terwee
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 4.  Physical activity and predisposition for hip fractures: a review.

Authors:  R M Joakimsen; J H Magnus; V Fønnebø
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Physical activity, obesity, and risk of colorectal adenoma in women (United States).

Authors:  E Giovannucci; G A Colditz; M J Stampfer; W C Willett
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.506

6.  Self-reported cardiovascular disease and risk factors. Prevalence in Ontario among women 50 and older.

Authors:  C Hodgson; E Jamieson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 7.  A systematic literature review of reviews on techniques for physical activity measurement in adults: a DEDIPAC study.

Authors:  Kieran P Dowd; Robert Szeklicki; Marco Alessandro Minetto; Marie H Murphy; Angela Polito; Ezio Ghigo; Hidde van der Ploeg; Ulf Ekelund; Janusz Maciaszek; Rafal Stemplewski; Maciej Tomczak; Alan E Donnelly
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 6.457

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.