BACKGROUND: Few data are available about the socioeconomic impact of cancer for long-term cancer survivors. OBJECTIVES: To investigate socioeconomic outcomes among older cancer survivors compared to non-cancer patients. DATA SOURCE: 2002 Health and Retirement Study. STUDY DESIGN: We studied 964 cancer survivors of > 4 years and 14,333 control patients who had never had cancer from a population-based sample of Americans ages >or= 55 years responding to the 2002 Health and Retirement Study. MEASURES: We compared household income, housing assets, net worth, insurance, employment, and future work expectations. ANALYSES: Propensity score methods were used to control for baseline differences between cancer survivors and controls. RESULTS: Female cancer survivors did not differ from non-cancer patients in terms of income, housing assets, net worth, or likelihood of current employment (all P > 0.20); but more were self-employed (25.0% vs. 17.7%; P = 0.03), and fewer were confident that if they lost their job they would find an equally good job in the next few months (38.4% vs. 45.9%; P = 0.03). Among men, cancer survivors and noncancer patients had similar income and housing assets (both P >or= 0.10) but differed somewhat in net worth (P = 0.04). Male cancer survivors were less likely than other men to be currently employed (25.2% vs. 29.7%) and more likely to be retired (66.9% vs. 62.2%), although the P value did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.06). Men were also less optimistic about finding an equally good job in the next few months if they lost their current job (33.5% vs. 46.9%), although this result was not significant (P = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: Despite generally similar socioeconomic outcomes for cancer survivors and noncancer patients ages >or=55 years, a better understanding of employment experience and pessimism regarding work prospects may help to shape policies to benefit cancer survivors.
BACKGROUND: Few data are available about the socioeconomic impact of cancer for long-term cancer survivors. OBJECTIVES: To investigate socioeconomic outcomes among older cancer survivors compared to non-cancerpatients. DATA SOURCE: 2002 Health and Retirement Study. STUDY DESIGN: We studied 964 cancer survivors of > 4 years and 14,333 control patients who had never had cancer from a population-based sample of Americans ages >or= 55 years responding to the 2002 Health and Retirement Study. MEASURES: We compared household income, housing assets, net worth, insurance, employment, and future work expectations. ANALYSES: Propensity score methods were used to control for baseline differences between cancer survivors and controls. RESULTS: Female cancer survivors did not differ from non-cancerpatients in terms of income, housing assets, net worth, or likelihood of current employment (all P > 0.20); but more were self-employed (25.0% vs. 17.7%; P = 0.03), and fewer were confident that if they lost their job they would find an equally good job in the next few months (38.4% vs. 45.9%; P = 0.03). Among men, cancer survivors and noncancer patients had similar income and housing assets (both P >or= 0.10) but differed somewhat in net worth (P = 0.04). Male cancer survivors were less likely than other men to be currently employed (25.2% vs. 29.7%) and more likely to be retired (66.9% vs. 62.2%), although the P value did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.06). Men were also less optimistic about finding an equally good job in the next few months if they lost their current job (33.5% vs. 46.9%), although this result was not significant (P = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: Despite generally similar socioeconomic outcomes for cancer survivors and noncancer patients ages >or=55 years, a better understanding of employment experience and pessimism regarding work prospects may help to shape policies to benefit cancer survivors.
Authors: Angela G E M de Boer; Taina Taskila; Anneli Ojajärvi; Frank J H van Dijk; Jos H A M Verbeek Journal: JAMA Date: 2009-02-18 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Linn Abraham; Berta M Geller; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Erin J A Bowles; Leah S Karliner; Stephen H Taplin; Diana L Miglioretti Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2009-03-20 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Beate Hauglann; Jūratė Saltytė Benth; Sophie D Fosså; Kjell M Tveit; Alv A Dahl Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2014-05-13 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Michael Feuerstein; Briana L Todd; Michal C Moskowitz; Gina L Bruns; Mallori R Stoler; Thomas Nassif; Xinhua Yu Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2010-10-14 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Damien Bennett; Therese Kearney; David W Donnelly; Amy Downing; Penny Wright; Sarah Wilding; Richard Wagland; Eila Watson; Adam Glaser; Anna Gavin Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2018-07-30 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Victoria S Blinder; Carolyn E Eberle; Christina Tran; Ting Bao; Manmeet Malik; Gabriel Jung; Caroline Hwang; Lewis Kampel; Sujata Patil; Francesca M Gany Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2020-10-26 Impact factor: 4.062