Jesse R Fann1, Ming-Yu Fan, Jürgen Unützer. 1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Box 356560, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. fann@u.washington.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Depression is common among older cancer patients, but little is known about the optimal approach to caring for this population. This analysis evaluates the effectiveness of the Improving Mood-Promoting Access to Collaborative Treatment (IMPACT) program, a stepped care management program for depression in primary care patients who had an ICD-9 cancer diagnosis. METHODS:Two hundred fifteen cancer patients were identified from the 1,801 participants in the parent study. Subjects were 60 years or older with major depression (18%), dysthymic disorder (33%), or both (49%), recruited from 18 primary care clinics belonging to 8 health-care organizations in 5 states. Patients were randomly assigned to the IMPACT intervention (n = 112) or usual care (n = 103). Intervention patients had access for up to 12 months to a depression care manager who was supervised by a psychiatrist and a primary care provider and who offered education, care management, support ofantidepressant management, and brief, structured psychosocial interventions including behavioral activation and problem-solving treatment. RESULTS: At 6 and 12 months, 55% and 39% of intervention patients had a 50% or greater reduction in depressive symptoms (SCL-20) from baseline compared to 34% and 20% of usual care participants (P = 0.003 and P = 0.029). Intervention patients also experienced greater remission rates (P = 0.031), more depression-free days (P < 0.001), less functional impairment (P = 0.011), and greater quality of life (P = 0.039) at 12 months than usual care participants. CONCLUSIONS: The IMPACT collaborative care program appears to be feasible and effective for depression among older cancer patients in diverse primary care settings.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Depression is common among older cancerpatients, but little is known about the optimal approach to caring for this population. This analysis evaluates the effectiveness of the Improving Mood-Promoting Access to Collaborative Treatment (IMPACT) program, a stepped care management program for depression in primary care patients who had an ICD-9 cancer diagnosis. METHODS: Two hundred fifteen cancerpatients were identified from the 1,801 participants in the parent study. Subjects were 60 years or older with major depression (18%), dysthymic disorder (33%), or both (49%), recruited from 18 primary care clinics belonging to 8 health-care organizations in 5 states. Patients were randomly assigned to the IMPACT intervention (n = 112) or usual care (n = 103). Intervention patients had access for up to 12 months to a depression care manager who was supervised by a psychiatrist and a primary care provider and who offered education, care management, support of antidepressant management, and brief, structured psychosocial interventions including behavioral activation and problem-solving treatment. RESULTS: At 6 and 12 months, 55% and 39% of intervention patients had a 50% or greater reduction in depressive symptoms (SCL-20) from baseline compared to 34% and 20% of usual care participants (P = 0.003 and P = 0.029). Intervention patients also experienced greater remission rates (P = 0.031), more depression-free days (P < 0.001), less functional impairment (P = 0.011), and greater quality of life (P = 0.039) at 12 months than usual care participants. CONCLUSIONS: The IMPACT collaborative care program appears to be feasible and effective for depression among older cancerpatients in diverse primary care settings.
Authors: Jürgen Unützer; Wayne Katon; Christopher M Callahan; John W Williams; Enid Hunkeler; Linda Harpole; Marc Hoffing; Richard D Della Penna; Polly Hitchcock Noël; Elizabeth H B Lin; Patricia A Areán; Mark T Hegel; Lingqi Tang; Thomas R Belin; Sabine Oishi; Christopher Langston Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-12-11 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Elizabeth H B Lin; Wayne Katon; Michael Von Korff; Lingqi Tang; John W Williams; Kurt Kroenke; Enid Hunkeler; Linda Harpole; Mark Hegel; Patricia Arean; Marc Hoffing; Richard Della Penna; Chris Langston; Jürgen Unützer Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-11-12 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Christopher M Callahan; Frederick W Unverzagt; Siu L Hui; Anthony J Perkins; Hugh C Hendrie Journal: Med Care Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Jill B Hamilton; Allison M Deal; Angelo D Moore; Nakia C Best; Kayoll V Galbraith; Hyman Muss Journal: Oncol Nurs Forum Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 2.172
Authors: Kelly E Irwin; Elyse R Park; Lauren E Fields; Amy E Corveleyn; Joseph A Greer; Giselle K Perez; Catherine A Callaway; Jamie M Jacobs; Andrew A Nierenberg; Jennifer S Temel; David P Ryan; William F Pirl Journal: Oncologist Date: 2019-01-29
Authors: Thuy Koll; Mackenzi Pergolotti; Holly M Holmes; Huibrie C Pieters; G J van Londen; Zachary A Marcum; Amy R MacKenzie; Christopher B Steer Journal: Curr Oncol Rep Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 5.075