Literature DB >> 19838729

Danger of low pressure alarm failure in preterm infants on continuous positive airway pressure.

Martin Wald1, Valerie Jeitler, Arnold Pollak, Lieselotte Kirchner.   

Abstract

In certain settings of conventional continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) application, the ventilator may not be able to detect dislodgement of the prongs. This occurs especially in settings with high flow and small prongs. We investigated the relation between ventilator flows, size of the nasal prongs, and pressure generated within the ventilator circuit due to the flow resistance of the prongs. We studied a Baby-flow CPAP connected to a Babylog 8000plus ventilator. Five prongs of increasing size (x-small, small, medium, large, x-large) and one nose mask were connected to the CPAP in turn. Starting at 30 lpm, the flow was reduced in 2 lpm steps. The dynamic pressure caused by the flow resistance of the prongs within the ventilator circuit was recorded. For all devices, we observed a correlation between the reduction of the flow and the reduction in pressure within the ventilator circuit. However, the flow resistance of the x-small prongs generated the highest dynamic pressure (30 mbar at 22 lpm) within the ventilator circuit while the mask gave rise to the lowest pressure (9 mbar at 30 lpm). The pressure value generated with x-small prongs at low flow rate was observed at high flow rate with x-large prongs or with a mask. We conclude that in settings with high flow rates, low CPAP levels, and small prongs, the resistance of the prongs will create enough dynamic pressure within the ventilator circuit to permit the ventilator to compensate a large leakage flow by closing the expiratory valve. Thus, in case of dislodgement of the prongs, the pressure within the ventilator circuit will not decrease below the alarm level, and the machine will not be able to generate an alarm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19838729     DOI: 10.1007/s00431-009-1078-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pediatr        ISSN: 0340-6199            Impact factor:   3.183


  14 in total

Review 1.  Nasal CPAP for neonates: what do we know in 2003?

Authors:  A G De Paoli; C Morley; P G Davis
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.747

2.  Noise levels within the ear and post-nasal space in neonates in intensive care.

Authors:  S S Surenthiran; K Wilbraham; J May; T Chant; A J B Emmerson; V E Newton
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.747

3.  Noise levels during nCPAP are flow-dependent but not device-dependent.

Authors:  O Karam; C Donatiello; E Van Lancker; V Chritin; R E Pfister; P C Rimensberger
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 5.747

4.  Comparison of different techniques to measure air leaks during CPAP treatment in neonates.

Authors:  G Schmalisch; H Fischer; C C Roehr; H Proquitté
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 2.242

5.  [Nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants: comparison of two low-resistance models].

Authors:  A Gutiérrez Laso; P Sáenz González; I Izquierdo Macián; C Fernández Gilino; A Gimeno Navarro; M Gormaz Moreno; D Torres Palomares; F Morcillo Sopena; V Roqués Serradilla
Journal:  An Pediatr (Barc)       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.500

6.  Treatment of the idiopathic respiratory-distress syndrome with continuous positive airway pressure.

Authors:  G A Gregory; J A Kitterman; R H Phibbs; W H Tooley; W K Hamilton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1971-06-17       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Nasal CPAP treatment of the respiratory distress syndrome: a prospective investigation of 10 new born infants.

Authors:  D Theilade
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Comparison of two different CPAP systems by tidal breathing parameters.

Authors:  Thomas Hückstädt; Bertram Foitzik; Roland R Wauer; Gerd Schmalisch
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-05-27       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Mouth closing device (chinstrap) reduces mouth leak during nasal CPAP.

Authors:  Adel Bachour; Kirsti Hurmerinta; Paula Maasilta
Journal:  Sleep Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.492

Review 10.  Devices and pressure sources for administration of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in preterm neonates.

Authors:  A G De Paoli; P G Davis; B Faber; C J Morley
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-01-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.