Literature DB >> 19838433

A prospective randomized trial comparing non-stented versus routine stented ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy.

Yong Xu1, Qiang Wei, Liang R Liu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether post-operative ureteral stenting is necessary after ureteroscopic lithotripsy for the treatment of middle and distal ureteral calculi.
METHODS: The trial was carried out in the Department of Urology of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China, between May 2005 and May 2006. A total of 110 patients underwent uncomplicated ureteroscopic lithotripsy. After the procedure, patients were randomized to a non-stented (n=55), or stented (n=55) group. The stent was routinely placed for 3 weeks. Outcome measures included operative time, visual analog scale, post-operative analgesic requirements, complications, and the stone-free rate.
RESULTS: The incidence of hematuria was higher and the operative time was longer in the stented group compared to the non-stented group. At 48 hours post-operatively, the symptoms of flank pain and abdominal pain were significantly greater in the stented group. There was no statistical difference in the 2 groups, in terms of irritative symptom, analgesic use, and complications. The stone-free rate was almost 100% in both groups.
CONCLUSION: Uncomplicated ureteroscopic lithotripsy can be safely performed without the placement of a ureteral stent. Patients without stents had less operative time, pain and hematuria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19838433

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Saudi Med J        ISSN: 0379-5284            Impact factor:   1.484


  9 in total

1.  A cost analysis of stenting in uncomplicated semirigid ureteroscopic stone removal.

Authors:  Stephan Seklehner; Karl-Dietrich Sievert; Richard Lee; Paul F Engelhardt; Claus Riedl; Thomas Kunit
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 2.  Is stone diameter a variable in the decision process of employing a ureteral stent in patients undergoing uncomplicated ureterorenoscopy and associated intracorporeal lithotripsy?

Authors:  Stefano C M Picozzi; Cristian Ricci; Robert Stubinski; Stefano Casellato; Dario Ratti; Alberto Macchi; Giorgio Bozzini; Luca Carmignani
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  [Uretero(reno)scopy: management of complications].

Authors:  T Knoll; G Wendt-Nordahl
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Meta-analysis of postoperatively stenting or not in patients underwent ureteroscopic lithotripsy.

Authors:  Turun Song; Banghua Liao; Shuo Zheng; Qiang Wei
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2011-05-15

Review 5.  Reprint - Ureteral stent vs. no ureteral stent for ureteroscopy in the management of renal and ureteral calculi: A Cochrane review.

Authors:  Maria Ordonez; Eu Chang Hwang; Michael Borofsky; Caitlin J Bakker; Shreyas Gandhi; Philipp Dahm
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Ureteral stent versus no ureteral stent for ureteroscopy in the management of renal and ureteral calculi.

Authors:  Maria Ordonez; Eu Chang Hwang; Michael Borofsky; Caitlin J Bakker; Shreyas Gandhi; Philipp Dahm
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-02-06

7.  RIRS versus mPCNL for single renal stone of 2-3 cm: clinical outcome and cost-effective analysis in Chinese medical setting.

Authors:  Jiahua Pan; Qi Chen; Wei Xue; Yonghui Chen; Lei Xia; Haige Chen; Yiran Huang
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2012-12-23       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  Meta-Analysis of Stenting versus Non-Stenting for the Treatment of Ureteral Stones.

Authors:  Hai Wang; Libo Man; Guizhong Li; Guanglin Huang; Ning Liu; Jianwei Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Intracorporeal laser lithotripsy.

Authors:  Athanasios G Papatsoris; Andreas Skolarikos; Noor Buchholz
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2012-03-26
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.