Literature DB >> 19837751

The advantages of nanoparticles for PET.

Michael J Welch1, Craig J Hawker, Karen L Wooley.   

Abstract

Nanoparticles have an advantage for molecular imaging in that many functionalities can be added to the surface and interior of the particle. This brief review focuses on the design of nanomaterials that take advantage of PET. An evolutionary approach is presented, leading to the optimization of the nanoparticle composition and structure to achieve controlled in vivo circulation and tissue-selective targeting. Organic and inorganic nanostructures are included. Nanoprobes for PET of angiogenesis and cancer are highlighted.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2009        PMID： 19837751     DOI： 10.2967/jnumed.109.061846

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN： 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  38 in total

Review 1.  Molecular imaging for personalized cancer care.

Authors:  Moritz F Kircher; Hedvig Hricak; Steven M Larson
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 6.603

2.  Hybrid PET-optical imaging using targeted probes.

Authors:  Matthias Nahrendorf; Edmund Keliher; Brett Marinelli; Peter Waterman; Paolo Fumene Feruglio; Lioubov Fexon; Misha Pivovarov; Filip K Swirski; Mikael J Pittet; Claudio Vinegoni; Ralph Weissleder
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Polymeric Nanostructures for Imaging and Therapy.

Authors:  Mahmoud Elsabahy; Gyu Seong Heo; Soon-Mi Lim; Guorong Sun; Karen L Wooley
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 4.  Imaging macrophages with nanoparticles.

Authors:  Ralph Weissleder; Matthias Nahrendorf; Mikael J Pittet
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 43.841

5.  Biocompatible inorganic nanoparticles for [18F]-fluoride binding with applications in PET imaging.

Authors:  Maite Jauregui-Osoro; Peter A Williamson; Arnaud Glaria; Kavitha Sunassee; Putthiporn Charoenphun; Mark A Green; Gregory E D Mullen; Philip J Blower
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 4.390

Review 6.  Imaging the paediatric lung: what does nanotechnology have to offer?

Authors:  K L Ordidge; B A Duffy; J A Wells; T L Kalber; S M Janes; M F Lythgoe
Journal:  Paediatr Respir Rev       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 2.726

7.  Peptide-conjugated polymeric micellar nanoparticles for Dual SPECT and optical imaging of EphB4 receptors in prostate cancer xenografts.

Authors:  Rui Zhang; Chiyi Xiong; Miao Huang; Min Zhou; Qian Huang; Xiaoxia Wen; Dong Liang; Chun Li
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Iron oxide nanoparticulate system as a cornerstone in the effective delivery of Tc-99 m radionuclide: a potential molecular imaging probe for tumor diagnosis.

Authors:  Mohamed M Swidan; Omnya M Khowessah; Mohamed Abd El-Motaleb; Ahmed Abd El-Bary; Mohamed T El-Kolaly; Tamer M Sakr
Journal:  Daru       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 9.  Nanoparticle-based probes to enable noninvasive imaging of proteolytic activity for cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Tareq Anani; Peter Panizzi; Allan E David
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 5.307

10.  Pretargeted Positron Emission Tomography Imaging That Employs Supramolecular Nanoparticles with in Vivo Bioorthogonal Chemistry.

Authors:  Shuang Hou; Jin-Sil Choi; Mitch Andre Garcia; Yan Xing; Kuan-Ju Chen; Yi-Ming Chen; Ziyue K Jiang; Tracy Ro; Lily Wu; David B Stout; James S Tomlinson; Hao Wang; Kai Chen; Hsian-Rong Tseng; Wei-Yu Lin
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 15.881
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.