BACKGROUND: Adipose tissue releases angiogenic factors that may promote tumour growth. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether body mass index (BMI), subcutaneous fat area (SFA) and visceral fat area (VFA) are associated with outcomes in patients given first-line bevacizumab-based treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC). Patients CT was used to measure SFA and VFA in 120 patients with MCC who received bevacizumab-based treatment (bevacizumab group, n=80) or chemotherapy alone (chemotherapy group, n=40) as first-line treatment. Associations linking BMI, SFA and VFA to tumour response, time-to-progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. RESULTS: In the bevacizumab group, median follow-up lasted for 24 months (3-70). BMI, SFA and VFA values above the median (ie, high BMI, high VFA and high SFA) were significantly associated with absence of a response. TTP was shorter in patients with high BMI (9 vs 12 months; p=0.01) or high VFA (9 vs 14 months; p=0.0008). High VFA was associated with shorter OS (p=0.0493). By multivariate analysis, high VFA was independently associated with response, TTP and OS (HR=7.18, p=0.008, HR=5.79, p=0.005 and HR=2.88, p=0.027, respectively). In the chemotherapy group, median follow-up lasted for 30 months (4-84). BMI, SFA and VFA were not associated with response, TTP or OS. In the whole population, interaction between VFA and bevacizumab administration was significant for response (OR=3.31, p=0.005) and TTP (HR=1.64, p=0.022), thereby confirming the results. CONCLUSION: This study provides the first evidence that high VFA independently predicts a poorer outcome in patients given first-line bevacizumab-based treatment for MCC. However, this predictive biomarker needs to be validated in a different dataset.
BACKGROUND: Adipose tissue releases angiogenic factors that may promote tumour growth. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether body mass index (BMI), subcutaneous fat area (SFA) and visceral fat area (VFA) are associated with outcomes in patients given first-line bevacizumab-based treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC). Patients CT was used to measure SFA and VFA in 120 patients with MCC who received bevacizumab-based treatment (bevacizumab group, n=80) or chemotherapy alone (chemotherapy group, n=40) as first-line treatment. Associations linking BMI, SFA and VFA to tumour response, time-to-progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. RESULTS: In the bevacizumab group, median follow-up lasted for 24 months (3-70). BMI, SFA and VFA values above the median (ie, high BMI, high VFA and high SFA) were significantly associated with absence of a response. TTP was shorter in patients with high BMI (9 vs 12 months; p=0.01) or high VFA (9 vs 14 months; p=0.0008). High VFA was associated with shorter OS (p=0.0493). By multivariate analysis, high VFA was independently associated with response, TTP and OS (HR=7.18, p=0.008, HR=5.79, p=0.005 and HR=2.88, p=0.027, respectively). In the chemotherapy group, median follow-up lasted for 30 months (4-84). BMI, SFA and VFA were not associated with response, TTP or OS. In the whole population, interaction between VFA and bevacizumab administration was significant for response (OR=3.31, p=0.005) and TTP (HR=1.64, p=0.022), thereby confirming the results. CONCLUSION: This study provides the first evidence that high VFA independently predicts a poorer outcome in patients given first-line bevacizumab-based treatment for MCC. However, this predictive biomarker needs to be validated in a different dataset.
Authors: Chun Seng Lee; David J Murphy; Colm McMahon; Blathnaid Nolan; Garret Cullen; Hugh Mulcahy; Kieran Sheahan; Elizabeth Barnes; David Fennelly; Elizabeth J Ryan; Glen A Doherty Journal: J Gastrointest Cancer Date: 2015-09
Authors: Bette J Caan; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Candyce H Kroenke; Stacey Alexeeff; Jingjie Xiao; Erin Weltzien; Elizabeth Cespedes Feliciano; Adrienne L Castillo; Charles P Quesenberry; Marilyn L Kwan; Carla M Prado Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2017-05-15 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Caroline Himbert; Mahmoud Delphan; Dominique Scherer; Laura W Bowers; Stephen Hursting; Cornelia M Ulrich Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2017-09
Authors: Aaron S Rickles; James C Iannuzzi; Oleg Mironov; Andrew-Paul Deeb; Abhiram Sharma; Fergal J Fleming; John R T Monson Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2012-10-23 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Joao Incio; Jennifer A Ligibel; Daniel T McManus; Priya Suboj; Keehoon Jung; Kosuke Kawaguchi; Matthias Pinter; Suboj Babykutty; Shan M Chin; Trupti D Vardam; Yuhui Huang; Nuh N Rahbari; Sylvie Roberge; Dannie Wang; Igor L Gomes-Santos; Stefan B Puchner; Christopher L Schlett; Udo Hoffmman; Marek Ancukiewicz; Sara M Tolaney; Ian E Krop; Dan G Duda; Yves Boucher; Dai Fukumura; Rakesh K Jain Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2018-03-14 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Whalen Clark; Erin M Siegel; Y Ann Chen; Xiuhua Zhao; Colin M Parsons; Jonathan M Hernandez; Jill Weber; Shalini Thareja; Junsung Choi; David Shibata Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2013-03-21 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Justin C Brown; Andrea B Troxel; Bonnie Ky; Nevena Damjanov; Babette S Zemel; Michael R Rickels; Andrew D Rhim; Anil K Rustgi; Kerry S Courneya; Kathryn H Schmitz Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2016-03-10 Impact factor: 2.226