Literature DB >> 19837298

Effect of a syndromic diagnosis on mandibular size and sagittal position in Robin sequence.

Gary F Rogers1, Gary Rogers, Asher A T Lim, John B Mulliken, Bonnie L Padwa.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Despite its pathogenic heterogeneity, it is often assumed that the small mandible in a neonate with Robin sequence will not grow normally. The purpose of this study was to determine mandibular length and position in patients with nonsyndromic versus syndromic Robin sequence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Lateral cephalograms of 51 children with Robin sequence were analyzed. Group I consisted of nonsyndromic (NS) subjects and group II consisted of subjects with the 4 most common syndromic (S) diagnoses. Cephalometric measurements included sella-nasion-A point (SNA), sella-nasion-B point (SNB), sella-nasion-pogonion (SNPg), articulare-gonion-pogonion (ArGoPg), temporomandibular joint-pogonion (TmPg), articulare-gonion (ArGo), and gonion-pogonion (GoPg). Differences between groups and subgroups were compared using t test.
RESULTS: There were 26 NS patients (mean age, 6.8 yrs) and 25 S patients (mean age, 8.7 yrs); mean age was statistically different between groups (P = .04); therefore, cephalometric measurements were compared with age-matched normal values. Syndromes included Stickler (n = 10), bilateral facial microsomia (n = 8), velocardiofacial (n = 4), and Treacher Collins (n = 3). SNA was statistically different from normal in both groups (NS, P = .017; S, P = .007); however, SNB was not different from normal for either group (NS, P = .175; S, P = .537). SNPg (0.007) was significantly greater than normal in NS (P = .007) but not in S (P = .702) patients. SNA, SNB, and SNPg were not significantly different between groups. In both groups, mandibular length was short (P = .00), especially in S patients (P = .049), mandibular body was small (NS, P = .00; S, P = .00), and the gonial angle more obtuse (NS, P = .006; S, P = .000) than normal. Ramus length was significantly shorter than normal only in S patients (P = .019). Mandibular length (TmPg) was smaller than normal in all S subgroups but with wide variability. There were statistically significant differences among S subgroups with respect to mandibular sagittal position (SNB, P = .00; SNPg, P = .00) and mandibular length (TmPg, P = .008). There were no differences in S subgroups with respect to age, SNA, ArGo, GoPg, and ArGoPg.
CONCLUSION: Mandibular morphology and position are variable in Robin sequence, based on the presence and type of associated syndromic diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19837298     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.06.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  9 in total

Review 1.  Surgical Management and Outcomes of Pierre Robin Sequence: A Comparison of Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis and Tongue-Lip Adhesion.

Authors:  Rosaline S Zhang; Ian C Hoppe; Jesse A Taylor; Scott P Bartlett
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Pierre Robin sequence and Treacher Collins hypoplastic mandible comparison using three-dimensional morphometric analysis.

Authors:  Michael T Chung; Benjamin Levi; Jeong S Hyun; David D Lo; Daniel T Montoro; Jeffrey Lisiecki; James P Bradley; Steven R Buchman; Michael T Longaker; Derrick C Wan
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.046

3.  Upper Airway Computed Tomography Measures and Receipt of Tracheotomy in Infants With Robin Sequence.

Authors:  Victoria S Lee; Kelly N Evans; Francisco A Perez; Assaf P Oron; Jonathan A Perkins
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 6.223

4.  A pragmatic approach to infants with Robin sequence: a retrospective cohort study and presence of a treatment algorithm.

Authors:  Emma C Paes; Daan P F van Nunen; Lucienne Speleman; Marvick S M Muradin; Bram Smarius; Moshe Kon; Aebele B Mink van der Molen; Aebele B Mink van der Molen; Titia L E M Niers; Esther S Veldhoen; Corstiaan C Breugem
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 5.  Update on 13 Syndromes Affecting Craniofacial and Dental Structures.

Authors:  Theodosia N Bartzela; Carine Carels; Jaap C Maltha
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  Severity of Retrognathia and Glossoptosis Does Not Predict Respiratory and Feeding Disorders in Pierre Robin Sequence.

Authors:  Anne Morice; Véronique Soupre; Delphine Mitanchez; Francis Renault; Brigitte Fauroux; Sandrine Marlin; Nicolas Leboulanger; Natacha Kadlub; Marie-Paule Vazquez; Arnaud Picard; Véronique Abadie
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 3.418

7.  Current Trends in Surgical Airway Management of Neonates with Robin Sequence.

Authors:  Kenneth L Fan; Max Mandelbaum; Justin Buro; Alex Rokni; Gary F Rogers; Jerry W Chao; Albert K Oh
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-11-07

8.  Characterization of phenotypes and predominant skeletodental patterns in pre-adolescent patients with Pierre-Robin sequence.

Authors:  Il-Hyung Yang; Jee Hyeok Chung; Hyeok Joon Lee; Il-Sik Cho; Jin-Young Choi; Jong-Ho Lee; Sukwha Kim; Seung-Hak Baek
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2021-09-25       Impact factor: 1.372

9.  Clinical outcomes of prenatal diagnosis of the fetal micrognathia: A case report.

Authors:  Jin-Wen Lu; Dan Lu; Xiao-Li Zhang; Jiao Bai
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.817

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.