Literature DB >> 19837179

Differential neural responses to faces physically similar to the self as a function of their valence.

Sara C Verosky1, Alexander Todorov.   

Abstract

Behavioral studies show that people self-enhance across a number of domains, including self-face recognition. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate whether response to physical similarity to the self would differ depending on whether the self-face was morphed with a positive (trustworthy) or negative (untrustworthy) novel face. Participants were presented with morphs of their faces (20%, 40%, 50%, 60%, and 80% self) and asked to decide whether the morph looked like them or the other face. Participants were more likely to identify the trustworthy than the untrustworthy morphs as looking like the self. Moreover, there were large differences in brain activation to trustworthy and untrustworthy morphs. As similarity of the untrustworthy morphs to the self decreased, the response in a number of regions, including bilateral posterior superior temporal sulcus/inferior parietal lobule, right inferior frontal gyrus, and bilateral middle/inferior temporal gyrus, increased. In contrast, there was little evidence for changes in activation as a function of the similarity to trustworthy faces. That is, these regions seemed to differentiate between the self and untrustworthy faces to a much greater extent than between the self and trustworthy faces, despite the fact that the task did not demand evaluation of the faces. The findings suggest that comparing the self to others who are viewed as positive versus negative triggers different psychological processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19837179     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  19 in total

1.  The social evaluation of faces: a meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  Peter Mende-Siedlecki; Christopher P Said; Alexander Todorov
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  ALE meta-analysis on facial judgments of trustworthiness and attractiveness.

Authors:  D Bzdok; R Langner; S Caspers; F Kurth; U Habel; K Zilles; A Laird; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.270

3.  Self-face advantage over familiar and unfamiliar faces: A three-level meta-analytic approach.

Authors:  Catherine Bortolon; Stéphane Raffard
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-08

4.  The neurobiology of self face recognition among depressed adolescents.

Authors:  Karina Quevedo; Madeline Harms; Mitchell Sauder; Hannah Scott; Sumaya Mohamed; Kathleen M Thomas; Michael-Paul Schallmo; Garry Smyda
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 4.839

5.  Intrinsic network connectivity and own body perception in gender dysphoria.

Authors:  Jamie D Feusner; Andreas Lidström; Teena D Moody; Cecilia Dhejne; Susan Y Bookheimer; Ivanka Savic
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.978

6.  Experiencing ownership over a dark-skinned body reduces implicit racial bias.

Authors:  Lara Maister; Natalie Sebanz; Günther Knoblich; Manos Tsakiris
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2013-05-13

7.  Plasticity in unimodal and multimodal brain areas reflects multisensory changes in self-face identification.

Authors:  Matthew A J Apps; Ana Tajadura-Jiménez; Marty Sereno; Olaf Blanke; Manos Tsakiris
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  The different faces of one's self: an fMRI study into the recognition of current and past self-facial appearances.

Authors:  Matthew A J Apps; Ana Tajadura-Jiménez; Grainne Turley; Manos Tsakiris
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 9.  The free-energy self: a predictive coding account of self-recognition.

Authors:  Matthew A J Apps; Manos Tsakiris
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 8.989

10.  The influence of social comparison on visual representation of one's face.

Authors:  Ethan Zell; Emily Balcetis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.