Literature DB >> 19836976

Conservative management of proximal humeral fractures: can poor functional outcome be related to standard transscapular radiographic evaluation?

Martijn Poeze1, Anton F Lenssen, Joey M Van Empel, Jan P Verbruggen.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: Functional outcome after conservative management is predicted by changes in angulation of the fractured humeral head and can be used for individual patients to predict functional outcome.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Standard anteroposterior (AP) and transscapular (Y) radiographs were used to evaluate 55 patients with minimally displaced proximal humeral fractures during the first week of conservative treatment. Functional outcome was determined by the Constant-Murley and Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores. The relationship between the variables and the radiographic evaluation was assessed by the Pearson correlation coefficient. Receiver operator curve (ROC) analysis and logistic regression analysis defined the optimal value for abnormalities on radiographic evaluation as an outcome predictor.
RESULTS: Mean (SD) angulations at time of the fracture were 53 degrees (19 degrees ) on AP view and 59 degrees (21 degrees ) on Y-view. After 1 week, these angulations were 47 degrees (20 degrees ) and 62 degrees (21 degrees ), respectively. Significant correlations between Constant-Murley (R(2)=0.43, P=.007) and DASH (R(2)=0.43, P=.04) outcome scores and the angulation of the humeral head fragment on the Y view, and not with AP angulation were found. The optimum predictive angulation at the Y view at time of fracture was 55 degrees or less for predicting adverse functional outcome with an area under the ROC curve of 0.78 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64-0.93; P=.006). Regression analysis showed that angulations on the initial Y view and after 1 week were the most important predictors of the functional outcome at a median of 2.2 years of follow-up.
CONCLUSION: This study indicated that radiographic evaluation in patients with minimally displaced proximal humeral fractures is helpful in prediction functional outcome during conservative treatment. Copyright 2010 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19836976     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.07.066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  6 in total

1.  Proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Craig S Mauro
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2011-12

2.  Social deprivation influences the epidemiology and outcome of proximal humeral fractures in adults for a defined urban population of Scotland.

Authors:  N D Clement; M M McQueen; C M Court-Brown
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-09-06

3.  Avascular necrosis in proximal humeral fractures in patients treated with operative fixation: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jiaming Xu; Changqing Zhang; Tao Wang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  Functional and quality of life outcome after non-operatively managed proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Ronnart N Kruithof; Henk A Formijne Jonkers; Denise J C van der Ven; Ger D J van Olden; Tim K Timmers
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2017-08-22

Review 5.  Current concepts in locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Christoph J Laux; Florian Grubhofer; Clément M L Werner; Hans-Peter Simmen; Georg Osterhoff
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Quantitative contrast enhanced dual energy CT to predict avascular necrosis: a feasibility study of proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Kevin B Hoover; Alexandria O Starks; Valentina Robila; Daniel L Riddle
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 1.930

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.