Literature DB >> 19836854

Peripherally inserted central venous catheters in the acute care setting: A safe alternative to high-risk short-term central venous catheters.

Basel Al Raiy1, Mohamad G Fakih, Nicole Bryan-Nomides, Debi Hopfner, Elizabeth Riegel, Trudy Nenninger, Janice Rey, Susan Szpunar, Pramodine Kale, Riad Khatib.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) serve as an alternative to short-term central venous catheters (CVCs) for providing intravenous (IV) access in the hospital. It is not clear which device has a lower risk of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI). We compared CVC- and PICC-related CLABSI rates in the setting of an intervention to remove high-risk CVCs.
METHODS: We prospectively followed patients with CVCs in the non-intensive care units (ICUs) and those with PICCs hospital-wide. A team evaluated the need for the CVC and the risk of infection, recommended the discontinuation of unnecessary or high-risk CVCs, and suggested PICC insertion for patients requiring prolonged access. Data on age, gender, type of catheter, duration of catheter utilization, and the development of CLABSIs were obtained.
RESULTS: A total of 638 CVCs were placed for 4917 catheter-days, during which 12 patients had a CLABSI, for a rate of 2.4 per 1000 catheter-days. A total of 622 PICCs were placed for 5703 catheter-days, during which 13 patients had a CLABSI, for a rate of 2.3 per 1000 catheter-days. The median time to development of infection was significantly longer in the patients with a PICC (23 vs 13 days; P=.03).
CONCLUSION: In the presence of active surveillance and intervention to remove unnecessary or high-risk CVCs, CVCs and PICCs had similar rates of CLABSIs. Given their longer time to the development of infection, PICCs may be a safe alternative for prolonged inpatient IV access. 2010 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19836854     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2009.06.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Infect Control        ISSN: 0196-6553            Impact factor:   2.918


  18 in total

1.  Peripherally inserted central catheters are equivalent to centrally inserted catheters in intensive care unit patients for central venous pressure monitoring.

Authors:  Heath E Latham; Scott T Rawson; Timothy T Dwyer; Chirag C Patel; Jo A Wick; Steven Q Simpson
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Infective Endocarditis in a Patient with Celiac Disease after Central Venous Catheter Insertion.

Authors:  Murtaza Sundhu; Suryanarayan Mohapatra; Salome Arobelidze; Parveen Gundelly; Anil Kumar Changarath Vijayan
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-02-13

3.  Peripherally inserted central catheters are associated with lower risk of bloodstream infection compared with central venous catheters in paediatric intensive care patients: a propensity-adjusted analysis.

Authors:  Ricardo Silveira Yamaguchi; Danilo Teixeira Noritomi; Natalia Viu Degaspare; Gabriela Ortega Cisternas Muñoz; Ana Paula Matos Porto; Silvia Figueiredo Costa; Otavio T Ranzani
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Peripherally inserted central venous catheter safety in burn care: a single-center retrospective cohort review.

Authors:  Ryan E Austin; Shahriar Shahrokhi; Siavash Bolourani; Marc G Jeschke
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.845

5.  An in vitro study comparing a peripherally inserted central catheter to a conventional central venous catheter: no difference in static and dynamic pressure transmission.

Authors:  Heath E Latham; Timothy T Dwyer; Bethene L Gregg; Steven Q Simpson
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 2.217

6.  Patterns and Predictors of Short-Term Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Use: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  David Paje; Anna Conlon; Scott Kaatz; Lakshmi Swaminathan; Tanya Boldenow; Steven J Bernstein; Scott A Flanders; Vineet Chopra
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.960

7.  Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters and Hemodialysis Outcomes.

Authors:  Rita L McGill; Robin Ruthazer; Klemens B Meyer; Dana C Miskulin; Daniel E Weiner
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 8.237

8.  Association of early skin breaks and neonatal thalamic maturation: A modifiable risk?

Authors:  Emma G Duerden; Ruth E Grunau; Vann Chau; Floris Groenendaal; Ting Guo; M Mallar Chakravarty; Manon Benders; Nienke Wagenaar; Rian Eijsermans; Corine Koopman; Anne Synnes; Linda de Vries; Steven P Miller
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Clinical experience with power-injectable PICCs in intensive care patients.

Authors:  Mauro Pittiruti; Alberto Brutti; Davide Celentano; Massimiliano Pomponi; Daniele G Biasucci; Maria Giuseppina Annetta; Giancarlo Scoppettuolo
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Comparison of Risks from Central Venous Catheters and Peripheral Intravenous Lines among Term Neonates in a Tertiary Care Hospital, India.

Authors:  Vicknesh Ratchagame; Vetriselvi Prabakaran
Journal:  J Caring Sci       Date:  2021-05-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.