Literature DB >> 19836851

Are English treatment centres treating less complex patients?

Andrew Street1, Peter Sivey, Anne Mason, Marisa Miraldo, Luigi Siciliani.   

Abstract

Activity-based funding involves remunerating healthcare providers a fixed price per patient in each payment category. However, no categorisation system can account perfectly for differences in patient complexity. Differences may be systematic if providers routinely attract high-risk patients or engage in patient selection. Such differences may be evident in the English National Health Service (NHS) following the introduction of treatment centres that concentrate on providing a small number of high-volume procedures. We analyse data for more than 3.3 million patients to assess whether the complexity of those treated in hospitals and treatment centres differs within twenty-nine payment categories, defined by Healthcare Resource Groups (HRGs). We find that patients treated in hospitals were more likely to come from more deprived areas, to have more diagnoses and to undergo significantly more procedures than patients seen by treatment centres, suggesting that hospitals are treating more complex cases. If these observed differences between hospitals and treatment centres drive costs, then payments should be refined to ensure fair reimbursement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19836851     DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.09.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  9 in total

1.  Early outcome of the Korean Diagnosis-Related Groups payment system for appendectomy.

Authors:  Hyeyoung Kim; In Mok Jung; Keong Won Yun; Seung Chul Heo; Young Joon Ahn; Ki-Tae Hwang; Hae Won Lee; Do Hoon Koo; Eunyoung Ko; Hye Seong Ahn; Rumi Shin; Jung Kee Chung
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 1.859

2.  Private sector treatment centres are treating less complex patients than the NHS.

Authors:  Anne Mason; Andrew Street; Rossella Verzulli
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Payments and quality of care in private for-profit and public hospitals in Greece.

Authors:  Elias Kondilis; Magda Gavana; Stathis Giannakopoulos; Emmanouil Smyrnakis; Nikolaos Dombros; Alexis Benos
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Mortality, length of stay, and inpatient charges for heart failure patients at public versus private hospitals in South Korea.

Authors:  Sun Jung Kim; Eun-Cheol Park; Tae Hyun Kim; Ji Won Yoo; Sang Gyu Lee
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.759

5.  Examining variations in hospital productivity in the English NHS.

Authors:  Adriana Castelli; Andrew Street; Rossella Verzulli; Padraic Ward
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2014-02-25

Review 6.  Do private hospitals outperform public hospitals regarding efficiency, accessibility, and quality of care in the European Union? A literature review.

Authors:  Florien M Kruse; Niek W Stadhouders; Eddy M Adang; Stef Groenewoud; Patrick P T Jeurissen
Journal:  Int J Health Plann Manage       Date:  2018-03-02

7.  Do independent treatment centers offer more value than general hospitals? The case of cataract care.

Authors:  Florien M Kruse; Stef Groenewoud; Femke Atsma; Onno P van der Galiën; Eddy M M Adang; Patrick P T Jeurissen
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Independent Treatment Centres Are Not a Guarantee for High Quality and Low Healthcare Prices in The Netherlands - A Study of 5 Elective Surgeries.

Authors:  Anouk Dorine Maria Tulp; Florien Margareth Kruse; Niek Waltherus Stadhouders; Patrick P T Jeurissen
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2020-09-01

9.  Competition in health markets: is something rotten?

Authors:  Livio Garattini; Anna Padula
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 5.344

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.