Literature DB >> 19836281

Evaluation of algorithms for automated phase correction of NMR spectra.

Hans de Brouwer1.   

Abstract

In our attempt to fully automate the data acquisition and processing of NMR analysis of dissolved synthetic polymers, phase correction was found to be the most challenging aspect. Several approaches in literature were evaluated but none of these was found to be capable of phasing NMR spectra with sufficient robustness and high enough accuracy to fully eliminate intervention by a human operator. Step by step, aspects from the process of manual/visual phase correction were translated into mathematical concepts and evaluated. This included area minimization, peak height maximization, negative peak minimization and baseline correction. It was found that not one single approach would lead to acceptable results but that a combination of aspects was required, in line again with the process of manual phase correction. The combination of baseline correction, area minimization and negative area penalization was found to give the desired results. The robustness was found to be 100% which means that the correct zeroth order and first order phasing parameters are returned independent of the position of the starting point of the search in this parameter space. When applied to high signal-to-noise proton spectra, the accuracy was such that the returned phasing parameters were within a distance of 0.1-0.4 degrees in the two dimensional parameter space which resulted in an average error of 0.1% in calculated properties such as copolymer composition and end groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19836281     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2009.09.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson        ISSN: 1090-7807            Impact factor:   2.229


  6 in total

1.  Phase correction of Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectra using MatLab.

Authors:  Yulin Qi; Christopher J Thompson; Steve L Van Orden; Peter B O'Connor
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  The effects of variations in tissue microstructure from postmortem rat brain on the asymmetry of the water proton resonance.

Authors:  Sean Foxley; Gregory S Karczmar; Kazutaka Takahashi
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  In vivo diffusion-weighted MRS using semi-LASER in the human brain at 3 T: Methodological aspects and clinical feasibility.

Authors:  Guglielmo Genovese; Małgorzata Marjańska; Edward J Auerbach; Lydia Yahia Cherif; Itamar Ronen; Stéphane Lehéricy; Francesca Branzoli
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 4.044

4.  Accurate, fully-automated NMR spectral profiling for metabolomics.

Authors:  Siamak Ravanbakhsh; Philip Liu; Trent C Bjorndahl; Trent C Bjordahl; Rupasri Mandal; Jason R Grant; Michael Wilson; Roman Eisner; Igor Sinelnikov; Xiaoyu Hu; Claudio Luchinat; Russell Greiner; David S Wishart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Preprocessing, analysis and quantification in single-voxel magnetic resonance spectroscopy: experts' consensus recommendations.

Authors:  Jamie Near; Ashley D Harris; Christoph Juchem; Roland Kreis; Małgorzata Marjańska; Gülin Öz; Johannes Slotboom; Martin Wilson; Charles Gasparovic
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 6.  Automatic 1D 1H NMR Metabolite Quantification for Bioreactor Monitoring.

Authors:  Roy Chih Chung Wang; David A Campbell; James R Green; Miroslava Čuperlović-Culf
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2021-03-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.