Literature DB >> 19836184

In vitro activity of tigecycline against 2423 clinical isolates and comparison of the available interpretation breakpoints.

Joseph Papaparaskevas1, Leonidas S Tzouvelekis, Athanassios Tsakris, Theodore E Pittaras, Nicholas J Legakis.   

Abstract

MICs to tigecycline and 12 antimicrobials were performed by microdilution method, against 2423 nonduplicate pathogens recently isolated in 17 Greek hospitals. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) criteria were used comparatively for interpretation of tigecycline MICs. Tigecycline exhibited potent in vitro activity against the majority of the isolates tested. (MIC(90) values of 0.5, 1, 2, 0.125, 1, 0.25, 0.125, and 1 mg/L were observed for Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter spp., Moraxella catarrhalis, Acinetobacter spp., Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus spp., and Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates, respectively.) Tigecycline activity was the same, irrespective of the resistance profile to other antimicrobials (Gram-negative pathogens susceptible or resistant to imipenem, Enterococcus spp., S. aureus, or S. pneumoniae isolates, susceptible or resistant to vancomycin, methicillin or penicillin, respectively). Interpretation using EUCAST and FDA breakpoints differed among isolates of K. pneumoniae and Enterobacter spp. having tigecycline MICs of 2 to 4 mg/L. In conclusion, tigecycline exhibited potent activity against pathogens recently isolated in a region that experiences high antimicrobial resistance rates. Indications that the available criteria might categorize differently tigecycline susceptibility status in K. pneumoniae and Enterobacter spp. isolates were also detected. 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19836184     DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2009.09.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0732-8893            Impact factor:   2.803


  7 in total

1.  Resistance trends and in vitro activity of tigecycline and 17 other antimicrobial agents against Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms, including multidrug-resistant pathogens, in Germany.

Authors:  M Kresken; K Becker; H Seifert; E Leitner; B Körber-Irrgang; C von Eiff; P-A Löschmann
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Trends in the susceptibility of clinically important resistant bacteria to tigecycline: results from the Tigecycline In Vitro Surveillance in Taiwan study, 2006 to 2010.

Authors:  Yen-Hsu Chen; Po-Liang Lu; Cheng-Hua Huang; Chun-Hsing Liao; Chin-Te Lu; Yin-Ching Chuang; Shih-Ming Tsao; Yao-Shen Chen; Yung-Ching Liu; Wei-Yu Chen; Tsrang-Neng Jang; Hsiu-Chen Lin; Chih-Ming Chen; Zhi-Yuan Shi; Sung-Ching Pan; Jia-Ling Yang; Hsiang-Chi Kung; Chun-Eng Liu; Yu-Jen Cheng; Jien-Wei Liu; Wu Sun; Lih-Shinn Wang; Wen-Chien Ko; Kwok-Woon Yu; Ping-Cherng Chiang; Ming-Hsun Lee; Chun-Ming Lee; Gwo-Jong Hsu; Po-Ren Hsueh
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  A focus on intra-abdominal infections.

Authors:  Massimo Sartelli
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  2013 WSES guidelines for management of intra-abdominal infections.

Authors:  Massimo Sartelli; Pierluigi Viale; Fausto Catena; Luca Ansaloni; Ernest Moore; Mark Malangoni; Frederick A Moore; George Velmahos; Raul Coimbra; Rao Ivatury; Andrew Peitzman; Kaoru Koike; Ari Leppaniemi; Walter Biffl; Clay Cothren Burlew; Zsolt J Balogh; Ken Boffard; Cino Bendinelli; Sanjay Gupta; Yoram Kluger; Ferdinando Agresta; Salomone Di Saverio; Imtiaz Wani; Alex Escalona; Carlos Ordonez; Gustavo P Fraga; Gerson Alves Pereira Junior; Miklosh Bala; Yunfeng Cui; Sanjay Marwah; Boris Sakakushev; Victor Kong; Noel Naidoo; Adamu Ahmed; Ashraf Abbas; Gianluca Guercioni; Nereo Vettoretto; Rafael Díaz-Nieto; Ihor Gerych; Cristian Tranà; Mario Paulo Faro; Kuo-Ching Yuan; Kenneth Yuh Yen Kok; Alain Chichom Mefire; Jae Gil Lee; Suk-Kyung Hong; Wagih Ghnnam; Boonying Siribumrungwong; Norio Sato; Kiyoshi Murata; Takayuki Irahara; Federico Coccolini; Helmut A Segovia Lohse; Alfredo Verni; Tomohisa Shoko
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  WSES consensus conference: Guidelines for first-line management of intra-abdominal infections.

Authors:  Massimo Sartelli; Pierluigi Viale; Kaoru Koike; Federico Pea; Fabio Tumietto; Harry van Goor; Gianluca Guercioni; Angelo Nespoli; Cristian Tranà; Fausto Catena; Luca Ansaloni; Ari Leppaniemi; Walter Biffl; Frederick A Moore; Renato Poggetti; Antonio Daniele Pinna; Ernest E Moore
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Resistance and the management of complicated skin and skin structure infections: the role of ceftobiprole.

Authors:  April Barbour; Hartmut Derendorf
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 2.423

7.  Current concept of abdominal sepsis: WSES position paper.

Authors:  Massimo Sartelli; Fausto Catena; Salomone Di Saverio; Luca Ansaloni; Mark Malangoni; Ernest E Moore; Frederick A Moore; Rao Ivatury; Raul Coimbra; Ari Leppaniemi; Walter Biffl; Yoram Kluger; Gustavo P Fraga; Carlos A Ordonez; Sanjay Marwah; Igor Gerych; Jae Gil Lee; Cristian Tranà; Federico Coccolini; Francesco Corradetti; James Kirkby-Bott
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 5.469

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.