Literature DB >> 19836142

The viability change of pigskin in vitro.

Liangpeng Ge1, Lihua Sun, Junyin Chen, Xiuli Mao, Yong Kong, Fei Xiong, Jun Wu, Hong Wei.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is widely recognised that take of grafts is strongly influenced by tissue viability. Although porcine skin is currently the most widely used xenograft, the viability change of pigskin in vitro has not been extensively studied. The purpose of this study was to assess the change of the viability of Bama miniature pigskin after harvest and cryopreservation, and to set up a guideline for pigskin preservation and storage that would allow the skin to retain the highest viability after treatment and still be used in the clinical applications.
METHODS: Harvested pigskin grafts were divided into five groups: normal saline medium/4 degrees C (group 1), Dulbecco's minimum essential medium (DMEM)/4 degrees C (group 2), normal saline medium/25 degrees C (group 3), DMEM/25 degrees C (group 4) and cryopreserved (group 5). In our experiment, the viability was investigated by 3-(4,5)-dimethylthiazol-2,5-diphenyl tetrasolium bromide (MTT) salt assay. We also evaluated the transplantation performance of preserved skin in different conditions by using a rat recipient model, in which primary take was evaluated by gross observation and predetermined histological criteria after 7 days.
RESULTS: Skin stored at 4 degrees C showed a very slow viability decrease with time. The sample showed a viability decrease of about 70% after 3 days in normal saline and 4 days in DMEM medium. Nevertheless, skin stored in DMEM at 25 degrees C underwent a viability increase during the first 4h and then decreased gradually to about 70% after 20 h, while the viability declined very quickly for skin grafts stored in normal saline medium at 25 degrees C, and maintained the same viability only within 6h of preservation. On the other hand, cryopreserved skin has been shown to maintain a level of skin metabolism equal to 77% of the fresh sample when measured immediately after thawing, and the viability remained about 70% after 6h at 25 degrees C and 2 days at 4 degrees C in DMEM. The graft performance of skin specimens with 70% viability of fresh skin stored in different conditions has not shown statistical significance compared with fresh pigskin.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on these results, we suggest that the conservation period of fresh pigskin should not exceed 72 or 96 h when stored in normal saline or DMEM at 4 degrees C, and should not exceed 6 or 18 h when stored in normal saline or DMEM at 25 degrees C. Cryopreserved pigskin should be stored in DMEM for a maximum period of 48 h at 4 degrees C and 6h at 25 degrees C after thawing. (c) 2009 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19836142     DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2009.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Burns        ISSN: 0305-4179            Impact factor:   2.744


  7 in total

1.  Conservation of somatic tissue derived from collared peccaries (Pecari tajacu Linnaeus, 1758) using direct or solid-surface vitrification techniques.

Authors:  Alana Azevedo Borges; Gabriela Liberalino Lima; Luiza Bento de Queiroz Neta; Maria Valéria de Oliveira Santos; Moacir Franco de Oliveira; Alexandre Rodrigues Silva; Alexsandra Fernandes Pereira
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2017-03-04       Impact factor: 2.058

2.  Clinical Impact of Cryopreservation on Split Thickness Skin Grafts in the Porcine Model.

Authors:  Paul W Holzer; Alexandre G Lellouch; Krysta Moulton; Laurence Zhu; Zhi Yang Ng; Bo Overschmidt; Amon-Ra Gama; Angelo A Leto Barone; Ivy Rosales; Rod Monroy; Curtis L Cetrulo
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 1.845

3.  Influence of storage time and nutrient medium on recovery of fibroblast-like cells from refrigerated collared peccary (Pecari tajacu Linnaeus, 1758) skin.

Authors:  Luiza Bento de Queiroz Neta; Gabriela Pereira de Oliveira Lira; Alana Azevedo Borges; Maria Valéria de Oliveira Santos; Maria Bárbara Silva; Lhara Ricarliany Medeiros de Oliveira; Alexandre Rodrigues Silva; Moacir Franco de Oliveira; Alexsandra Fernandes Pereira
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 2.416

4.  Utility of cell viability assays for use with ex vivo vocal fold epithelial tissue.

Authors:  Elizabeth Erickson-DiRenzo; M Preeti Sivasankar; Susan L Thibeault
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 5.  Skin xenotransplantation: Historical review and clinical potential.

Authors:  Takayuki Yamamoto; Hayato Iwase; Timothy W King; Hidetaka Hara; David K C Cooper
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 2.744

6.  Long-term IgG response to porcine Neu5Gc antigens without transmission of PERV in burn patients treated with porcine skin xenografts.

Authors:  Linda Scobie; Vered Padler-Karavani; Stephanie Le Bas-Bernardet; Claire Crossan; Josef Blaha; Magda Matouskova; Ralph D Hector; Emanuele Cozzi; Bernard Vanhove; Beatrice Charreau; Gilles Blancho; Ludovic Bourdais; Mariachiara Tallacchini; Juan M Ribes; Hai Yu; Xi Chen; Jitka Kracikova; Ludomir Broz; Jiri Hejnar; Pavel Vesely; Yasuhiro Takeuchi; Ajit Varki; Jean-Paul Soulillou
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 5.422

7.  Effect of storage temperature on cultured epidermal cell sheets stored in xenobiotic-free medium.

Authors:  Catherine Jackson; Peder Aabel; Jon R Eidet; Edward B Messelt; Torstein Lyberg; Magnus von Unge; Tor P Utheim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.