Literature DB >> 19834708

The long modified extended sliding trochanteric osteotomy.

Dror Lakstein1, Yona Kosashvili, David Backstein, Oleg Safir, Paul Lee, Allan E Gross.   

Abstract

The modified extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO) preserves the posterior capsule and short external rotators through a lateral approach to the hip. The purpose of this study was to assess the performance of long ETOs, measuring 18 cm and above. Fifty three long ETOs were reviewed. The mean length of the osteotomy was 20.0 cm (range, 18-26). Mean scratch-fit length was 6.5 cm. Average follow-up was 57 months (range, 14-114 months). The Harris hip score improved from 37 preoperatively to 73 at last follow-up. Subsidence occurred in 12 (22.6%) cases. Eleven stems stabilised over the first year. One stem (1.9%) was revised for subsidence and loosening, one for a periprosthetic fracture and one for a fractured stem. Two (3.8%) cups had postoperative dislocations. Fifty two (98.1%) osteotomies united well. This series shows a low failure rate, with revision and union rates comparable to those reported for shorter ETOs. Performing the osteotomy through a lateral approach to the hip will enhance posterior stability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19834708      PMCID: PMC3014489          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-009-0890-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  22 in total

1.  The extended trochanteric osteotomy in revision hip arthroplasty: a critical review of 166 cases at mean 3-year, 9-month follow-up.

Authors:  T M Miner; N G Momberger; D Chong; W L Paprosky
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Extended slide trochanteric osteotomy for revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  W M Chen; J P McAuley; C A Engh; R H Hopper; C A Engh
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Controlled femoral fracture: easy in.

Authors:  Wayne G Paprosky; Scott M Sporer
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Extended trochanteric osteotomy in complex primary total hip arthroplasty. A brief note.

Authors:  Craig J Della Valle; Richard A Berger; Aaron G Rosenberg; Joshua J Jacobs; Mitchell B Sheinkop; Wayne G Paprosky
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Use of the extended trochanteric osteotomy in treating prosthetic hip infection.

Authors:  Brett R Levine; Craig J Della Valle; Mark Hamming; Scott M Sporer; Richard A Berger; Wayne G Paprosky
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Revision of total hip arthroplasty: clinical outcome of extended trochanteric osteotomy and intraoperative femoral fracture.

Authors:  Matthias Lerch; Gabriela von Lewinski; Henning Windhagen; Fritz Thorey
Journal:  Technol Health Care       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.285

7.  Revision of total hip arthroplasty using the Kerboull and KT plates.

Authors:  Tomonori Baba; Katsuo Shitoto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Revision total hip arthroplasty: the limits of fully coated stems.

Authors:  Scott M Sporer; Wayne G Paprosky
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Extended trochanteric osteotomy via the direct lateral approach in revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Steven J MacDonald; Chris Cole; Jeff Guerin; Cecil H Rorabeck; Robert B Bourne; Richard W McCalden
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Modified trochanteric slide for complex hip arthroplasty: clinical outcomes and complication rates.

Authors:  Dror Lakstein; David J Backstein; Oleg Safir; Yona Kosashvili; Allan E Gross
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 4.757

View more
  7 in total

1.  Closed suction drainage has no benefits in revision total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Simcha G Fichman; Tatu J Mäkinen; Benjamin Lozano; Wael A Rahman; Oleg Safir; Allan E Gross; David Backstein; Paul R T Kuzyk
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Extended trochanteric osteotomy: current concepts review.

Authors:  Senthil Nathan Sambandam; Gopinath Duraisamy; Jayadev Chandrasekharan; Varatharaj Mounasamy
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-02-29

3.  Mid-term outcomes of the Wagner Cone Prosthesis™ stem for developmental dysplasia of the hip: minimum two year follow-up.

Authors:  Anser Daud; Ryan Perlus; Amit Anand; Oleg A Safir; Allan E Gross; Paul R Kuzyk
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 3.479

4.  Dislocation after the first and multiple revision total hip arthroplasty: comparison between acetabulum-only, femur-only and both component revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yona Kosashvili; Michael Drexler; David Backstein; Oleg Safir; Dror Lakstein; Alex Safir; Raja Chakravertty; Tim Dwyer; Allan Gross
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  Extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO) and fluted tapered modular stems in revision hip arthroplasty. Does ETO integrity or consolidation, really matter?

Authors:  Germán Garabano; Alan Maximiliano Gessara; Cesar Angel Pesciallo; Leonel Perez Alamino; Hernán Del Sel
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-02-09

6.  [Effectiveness of proximal femur reconstruction combined with total hip arthroplasty for Crowe type Ⅳ developmental dysplasia of hip].

Authors:  Lei Tang; Min Chen; Guoyuan Li; Zhengliang Luo; Xiaofeng Ji; Xiaoqi Zhang; Kerong Wu; Chen Zhu; Xifu Shang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-06-15

7.  An in-vitro biomechanical study of different fixation techniques for the extended trochanteric osteotomy in revision THA.

Authors:  Zhonglin Zhu; Hui Ding; Hongyi Shao; Yixin Zhou; Guangzhi Wang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 2.359

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.