BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia in clinical practice. Its treatment is still widely debated due to the large variety of therapeutic options. Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) around pulmonary vein ostia and in the left atrium has been proposed as a technique to cure atrial fibrillation and is now performed with increasing success worldwide. However, few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are available. Some of these have been published recently and are not yet included in meta-analyses. OBJECTIVES: We conducted a meta-analysis to summarize the current evidence base for the efficacy and safety of RFCA in patients with atrial fibrillation. METHODS: We searched electronic databases for relevant RCTs comparing RFCA with antiarrhythmic drugs for the management of atrial fibrillation. Recurrence of any atrial tachyarrhythmia (including atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter and atrial tachycardia) and rate of complications and adverse events were the end-points of the analysis. The results are reported as relative risk and 95% confidence interval, calculated using RevMan 5. RESULTS: A total of eight RCTs were identified including 844 patients. Overall, 98 (23.2%) of 421 patients in the treatment group and 324 (76.6%) of 423 patients in the control group had atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence. RFCA decreased atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence by 71% (relative risk 0.29, 95% confidence interval 0.20-0.41, P < 0.00001, with random effects model). Fewer complications and adverse events were reported in the ablation group compared with the control group (relative risk 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.40-1.30, P = 0.28, with random effects model). CONCLUSION: In selected patients with atrial fibrillation, RFCA is a relatively effective and well-tolerated procedure to cure atrial fibrillation. Even though the results of our systematic review favour ablation therapy, large, well-designed RCTs are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of RFCA for the management of atrial fibrillation.
BACKGROUND:Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia in clinical practice. Its treatment is still widely debated due to the large variety of therapeutic options. Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) around pulmonary vein ostia and in the left atrium has been proposed as a technique to cure atrial fibrillation and is now performed with increasing success worldwide. However, few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are available. Some of these have been published recently and are not yet included in meta-analyses. OBJECTIVES: We conducted a meta-analysis to summarize the current evidence base for the efficacy and safety of RFCA in patients with atrial fibrillation. METHODS: We searched electronic databases for relevant RCTs comparing RFCA with antiarrhythmic drugs for the management of atrial fibrillation. Recurrence of any atrial tachyarrhythmia (including atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter and atrial tachycardia) and rate of complications and adverse events were the end-points of the analysis. The results are reported as relative risk and 95% confidence interval, calculated using RevMan 5. RESULTS: A total of eight RCTs were identified including 844 patients. Overall, 98 (23.2%) of 421 patients in the treatment group and 324 (76.6%) of 423 patients in the control group had atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence. RFCA decreased atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence by 71% (relative risk 0.29, 95% confidence interval 0.20-0.41, P < 0.00001, with random effects model). Fewer complications and adverse events were reported in the ablation group compared with the control group (relative risk 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.40-1.30, P = 0.28, with random effects model). CONCLUSION: In selected patients with atrial fibrillation, RFCA is a relatively effective and well-tolerated procedure to cure atrial fibrillation. Even though the results of our systematic review favour ablation therapy, large, well-designed RCTs are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of RFCA for the management of atrial fibrillation.
Authors: Michiel Rienstra; Steven A Lubitz; Saagar Mahida; Jared W Magnani; João D Fontes; Moritz F Sinner; Isabelle C Van Gelder; Patrick T Ellinor; Emelia J Benjamin Journal: Circulation Date: 2012-06-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Hugh Calkins; Karl Heinz Kuck; Riccardo Cappato; Josep Brugada; A John Camm; Shih-Ann Chen; Harry J G Crijns; Ralph J Damiano; D Wyn Davies; John DiMarco; James Edgerton; Kenneth Ellenbogen; Michael D Ezekowitz; David E Haines; Michel Haissaguerre; Gerhard Hindricks; Yoshito Iesaka; Warren Jackman; Jose Jalife; Pierre Jais; Jonathan Kalman; David Keane; Young-Hoon Kim; Paulus Kirchhof; George Klein; Hans Kottkamp; Koichiro Kumagai; Bruce D Lindsay; Moussa Mansour; Francis E Marchlinski; Patrick M McCarthy; J Lluis Mont; Fred Morady; Koonlawee Nademanee; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Andrea Natale; Stanley Nattel; Douglas L Packer; Carlo Pappone; Eric Prystowsky; Antonio Raviele; Vivek Reddy; Jeremy N Ruskin; Richard J Shemin; Hsuan-Ming Tsao; David Wilber Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Craig T January; L Samuel Wann; Joseph S Alpert; Hugh Calkins; Joaquin E Cigarroa; Joseph C Cleveland; Jamie B Conti; Patrick T Ellinor; Michael D Ezekowitz; Michael E Field; Katherine T Murray; Ralph L Sacco; William G Stevenson; Patrick J Tchou; Cynthia M Tracy; Clyde W Yancy Journal: Circulation Date: 2014-03-28 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jane Dewire; Sunil Agarwal; Irfan K Khurram; Joseph E Marine; Ronald Berger; David Spragg; Hiroshi Ashikaga; John Rickard; Saman Nazarian; Hugh Calkins Journal: J Atr Fibrillation Date: 2013-10-31