Literature DB >> 19834191

A user study to compare four uncertainty visualization methods for 1D and 2D datasets.

Jibonananda Sanyal1, Song Zhang, Gargi Bhattacharya, Phil Amburn, Robert J Moorhead.   

Abstract

Many techniques have been proposed to show uncertainty in data visualizations. However, very little is known about their effectiveness in conveying meaningful information. In this paper, we present a user study that evaluates the perception of uncertainty amongst four of the most commonly used techniques for visualizing uncertainty in one-dimensional and two-dimensional data. The techniques evaluated are traditional errorbars, scaled size of glyphs, color-mapping on glyphs, and color-mapping of uncertainty on the data surface. The study uses generated data that was designed to represent the systematic and random uncertainty components. Twenty-seven users performed two types of search tasks and two types of counting tasks on 1D and 2D datasets. The search tasks involved finding data points that were least or most uncertain. The counting tasks involved counting data features or uncertainty features. A 4x4 full-factorial ANOVA indicated a significant interaction between the techniques used and the type of tasks assigned for both datasets indicating that differences in performance between the four techniques depended on the type of task performed. Several one-way ANOVAs were computed to explore the simple main effects. Bonferronni's correction was used to control for the family-wise error rate for alpha-inflation. Although we did not find a consistent order among the four techniques for all the tasks, there are several findings from the study that we think are useful for uncertainty visualization design. We found a significant difference in user performance between searching for locations of high and searching for locations of low uncertainty. Errorbars consistently underperformed throughout the experiment. Scaling the size of glyphs and color-mapping of the surface performed reasonably well. The efficiency of most of these techniques were highly dependent on the tasks performed. We believe that these findings can be used in future uncertainty visualization design. In addition, the framework developed in this user study presents a structured approach to evaluate uncertainty visualization techniques, as well as provides a basis for future research in uncertainty visualization.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 19834191     DOI: 10.1109/TVCG.2009.114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph        ISSN: 1077-2626            Impact factor:   4.579


  7 in total

1.  From Quantification to Visualization: A Taxonomy of Uncertainty Visualization Approaches.

Authors:  Kristin Potter; Paul Rosen; Chris R Johnson
Journal:  IFIP Adv Inf Commun Technol       Date:  2012

2.  Matching visual saliency to confidence in plots of uncertain data.

Authors:  David Feng; Lester Kwock; Yueh Lee; Russell M Taylor
Journal:  IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.579

3.  Task-Driven Evaluation of Aggregation in Time Series Visualization.

Authors:  Danielle Albers; Michael Correll; Michael Gleicher
Journal:  Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst       Date:  2014

4.  GRACE: A visual comparison framework for integrated spatial and non-spatial geriatric data.

Authors:  Adrian Maries; Nathan Mays; Meganolson Hunt; Kim F Wong; William Layton; Robert Boudreau; Caterina Rosano; G Elisabeta Marai
Journal:  IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.579

5.  Tailoring the visual communication of climate projections for local adaptation practitioners in Germany and the UK.

Authors:  Susanne Lorenz; Suraje Dessai; Piers M Forster; Jouni Paavola
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2015-11-28       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Effects of ensemble and summary displays on interpretations of geospatial uncertainty data.

Authors:  Lace M Padilla; Ian T Ruginski; Sarah H Creem-Regehr
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2017-10-04

Review 7.  A review and outlook on visual analytics for uncertainties in functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Michael de Ridder; Karsten Klein; Jinman Kim
Journal:  Brain Inform       Date:  2018-07-03
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.