Literature DB >> 19834098

Bacteriological contamination, dirt, and cracks of eggshells in furnished cages and noncage systems for laying hens: an international on-farm comparison.

K De Reu1, T B Rodenburg, K Grijspeerdt, W Messens, M Heyndrickx, F A M Tuyttens, B Sonck, J Zoons, L Herman.   

Abstract

For laying hens, the effects of housing system on bacterial eggshell contamination and eggshell quality is almost exclusively studied in experimental hen houses. The aim of this study was to compare eggshell hygiene and quality under commercial conditions. Six flocks of laying hens in furnished cages and 7 flocks in noncage systems were visited when hens were about 60 wk of age. Farms from Belgium, the Netherlands, and Germany were included in the study. The following parameters were determined on eggs sampled at the egg belts: 1) bacterial eggshell contamination, as expressed by total count of aerobic bacteria and number of Enterobacteriaceae; 2) proportion of dirty eggs; and 3) proportion of cracked eggs and eggs with microcracks. Considerable within-flock differences were found in eggshell contamination with total count of aerobic bacteria, both for furnished cages (P < or = 0.001, range 4.24 to 5.22 log cfu/eggshell) and noncage systems (P < or = 0.001, range 4.35 to 5.51 log cfu/eggshell). On average, lower levels of contamination with total count of aerobic bacteria (4.75 vs. 4.98 log cfu/eggshell; P < or = 0.001) were found on eggshells from furnished cages compared with noncage systems. Concerning Enterobacteriaceae, no significant difference in average eggshell contamination between both systems could be shown. The total percentage of cracked eggs was higher (P < or = 0.01) in furnished cages (7.8%) compared with noncage systems (4.1%). This was, however, due to the high percentage of cracked eggs (24%) observed on one of the furnished cage farms. We conclude that bacteriological eggshell contamination and percentage of cracked eggs differed substantially between individual farms using the same housing system. This may also explain some discrepancies between the findings of the present study versus some findings of previous experimental studies or studies on a small number of farms. Although statistically significant, the average differences in bacteriological contamination of nest eggs between both housing systems have limited microbiological relevancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19834098     DOI: 10.3382/ps.2009-00097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  5 in total

1.  Effects of different mating strategies in broiler breeder during peak and postpeak phase on subsequent broiler performance.

Authors:  Muhammad Shabir Shaheen; Shahid Mehmood; Athar Mahmud; Amjad Riaz
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Effects of housing systems on keel bone damage and egg quality of laying ‎hens.

Authors:  Anna Dedousi; Mirjana Đukić Stojčić; Evangelia Sossidou
Journal:  Vet Res Forum       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 1.054

3.  Influence of commercial laying hen housing systems on the incidence and identification of Salmonella and Campylobacter.

Authors:  D R Jones; J Guard; R K Gast; R J Buhr; P J Fedorka-Cray; Z Abdo; J R Plumblee; D V Bourassa; N A Cox; L L Rigsby; C I Robison; P Regmi; D M Karcher
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Microbiological impact of three commercial laying hen housing systems.

Authors:  D R Jones; N A Cox; J Guard; P J Fedorka-Cray; R J Buhr; R K Gast; Z Abdo; L L Rigsby; J R Plumblee; D M Karcher; C I Robison; R A Blatchford; M M Makagon
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Opinion of Belgian Egg Farmers on Hen Welfare and Its Relationship with Housing Type.

Authors:  Lisanne M Stadig; Bart A Ampe; Suzy Van Gansbeke; Tom Van den Bogaert; Evelien D'Haenens; Jasper L T Heerkens; Frank A M Tuyttens
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 2.752

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.