Literature DB >> 19834035

Eyelid pressure and contact with the ocular surface.

Alyra J Shaw1, Michael J Collins, Brett A Davis, Leo G Carney.   

Abstract

Purpose. To investigate static upper eyelid pressure and contact with the ocular surface in a group of young adult subjects. Methods. Static upper eyelid pressure was measured for 11 subjects using a piezoresistive pressure sensor attached to a rigid contact lens. Measures of eyelid pressure were derived from an active pressure cell (1.14-mm square) beneath the central upper eyelid margin. To investigate the contact region between the upper eyelid and the ocular surface, the authors used pressure-sensitive paper and the lissamine-green staining of Marx's line. These measures, combined with the pressure sensor readings, were used to derive estimates of eyelid pressure. Results. The mean contact width between the eyelids and the ocular surface estimated using pressure-sensitive paper was 0.60 +/- 0.16 mm, whereas the mean width of Marx's line was 0.09 +/- 0.02 mm. The mean central upper eyelid pressure was calculated to be 3.8 +/- 0.7 mm Hg (assuming that the whole pressure cell was loaded), 8.0 +/- 3.4 mm Hg (derived using the pressure-sensitive paper imprint widths), and 55 +/- 26 mm Hg (based on contact widths equivalent to Marx's line). Conclusions. The pressure-sensitive paper measurements suggested that a band of the eyelid margin, significantly larger than the anatomic zone of the eyelid margin known as Marx's line, had primary contact with the ocular surface. Using these measurements as the contact between the eyelid margin and the ocular surface, the authors believe that the mean pressure of 8.0 +/- 3.4 mm Hg is the most reliable estimate of static upper eyelid pressure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19834035     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.09-4090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  15 in total

1.  Comparison of two measurements for the lower lid margin thickness: vernier micrometer and anterior segment optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Da-Hu Wang; Jie Yao; Xin-Quan Liu
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07-12       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Effect of unilateral congenital ptosis on ocular higher order aberrations in children.

Authors:  Dhivya Ashok Kumar; Amar Agarwal Ms; Gaurav Prakash; Neha Vajpayee Boptm; Sathiya Packiyalakshmi; Athiya Agarwal
Journal:  Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol       Date:  2013

Review 3.  Impact of Attrition, Intercellular Shear in Dry Eye Disease: When Cells are Challenged and Neurons are Triggered.

Authors:  Gysbert-Botho van Setten
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Correlation between Tribological Properties and the Quantified Structural Changes of Lysozyme on Poly (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) Contact Lens.

Authors:  You-Cheng Chang; Chen-Ying Su; Chia-Hua Chang; Hsu-Wei Fang; Yang Wei
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 4.329

5.  Simulated optical performance of soft contact lenses on the eye.

Authors:  Ahmed Abass; Samantha Stuart; Bernardo T Lopes; Dong Zhou; Brendan Geraghty; Richard Wu; Steve Jones; Ilse Flux; Reinier Stortelder; Arnoud Snepvangers; Renato Leca; Ahmed Elsheikh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Linking Friction and Surface Properties of Hydrogels Molded Against Materials of Different Surface Energies.

Authors:  Yuki A Meier; Kaihuan Zhang; Nicholas D Spencer; Rok Simic
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 3.882

7.  Simulation of the Effect of Material Properties on Soft Contact Lens On-Eye Power.

Authors:  Joshua Moore; Bernardo T Lopes; Ashkan Eliasy; Brendan Geraghty; Richard Wu; Lynn White; Ahmed Elsheikh; Ahmed Abass
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-09

8.  Change in the geometry of positive- and negative-powered soft contact lenses during wear.

Authors:  Bartlomiej J Kaluzny; Joanna Stachura; Patryk Mlyniuk; Alfonso Jimenez-Villar; Magdalena Wietlicka-Piszcz; Ireneusz Grulkowski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Relationship Between Eyelid Pressure and Lacrimal Status in Mild Facial Nerve Palsy.

Authors:  Patricia Ann L Lee; Aric Vaidya; Shinjiro Kono; Hirohiko Kakizaki; Yasuhiro Takahashi
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-01-20

10.  A novel standardized distraction test to evaluate lower eyelid tension using three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry.

Authors:  Xiaoyi Hou; Alexander C Rokohl; Marius M Meinke; Senmao Li; Jinhua Liu; Wanlin Fan; Ming Lin; Renbing Jia; Yongwei Guo; Ludwig M Heindl
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.