Literature DB >> 19834012

Recombinant human erythropoietin in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke.

Hannelore Ehrenreich1, Karin Weissenborn, Hilmar Prange, Dietmar Schneider, Christian Weimar, Katja Wartenberg, Peter D Schellinger, Matthias Bohn, Harald Becker, Martin Wegrzyn, Peter Jähnig, Manfred Herrmann, Michael Knauth, Mathias Bähr, Wolfgang Heide, Armin Wagner, Stefan Schwab, Heinz Reichmann, Günther Schwendemann, Reinhard Dengler, Andreas Kastrup, Claudia Bartels.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Numerous preclinical findings and a clinical pilot study suggest that recombinant human erythropoietin (EPO) provides neuroprotection that may be beneficial for the treatment of patients with ischemic stroke. Although EPO has been considered to be a safe and well-tolerated drug over 2 decades, recent studies have identified increased thromboembolic complications and/or mortality risks on EPO administration to patients with cancer or chronic kidney disease. Accordingly, the double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized German Multicenter EPO Stroke Trial (Phase II/III; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00604630) was designed to evaluate efficacy and safety of EPO in stroke.
METHODS: This clinical trial enrolled 522 patients with acute ischemic stroke in the middle cerebral artery territory (intent-to-treat population) with 460 patients treated as planned (per-protocol population). Within 6 hours of symptom onset, at 24 and 48 hours, EPO was infused intravenously (40,000 IU each). Systemic thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator was allowed and stratified for.
RESULTS: Unexpectedly, a very high number of patients received recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (63.4%). On analysis of total intent-to-treat and per-protocol populations, neither primary outcome Barthel Index on Day 90 (P=0.45) nor any of the other outcome parameters showed favorable effects of EPO. There was an overall death rate of 16.4% (n=42 of 256) in the EPO and 9.0% (n=24 of 266) in the placebo group (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.16 to 3.38; P=0.01) without any particular mechanism of death unexpected after stroke.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on analysis of total intent-to-treat and per-protocol populations only, this is a negative trial that also raises safety concerns, particularly in patients receiving systemic thrombolysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19834012     DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.564872

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  219 in total

Review 1.  Intracranial hemorrhage.

Authors:  Andrew M Naidech
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 21.405

2.  Non-erythroid effects of erythropoietin.

Authors:  Murat O Arcasoy
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 9.941

3.  Targeting glia for treatment of neurological disease.

Authors:  David A Rempe; Maiken Nedergaard
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 7.620

4.  Effects of posttraumatic carbamylated erythropoietin therapy on reducing lesion volume and hippocampal cell loss, enhancing angiogenesis and neurogenesis, and improving functional outcome in rats following traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Ye Xiong; Asim Mahmood; Yanlu Zhang; Yuling Meng; Zheng Gang Zhang; Changsheng Qu; Thomas N Sager; Michael Chopp
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Fast neuroprotection (fast-NPRX) for acute ischemic stroke victims: the time for treatment is now.

Authors:  Paul A Lapchak
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 6.829

6.  Erythropoietin inhibits HIF-1α expression via upregulation of PHD-2 transcription and translation in an in vitro model of hypoxia-ischemia.

Authors:  Rhonda Souvenir; Jerry J Flores; Robert P Ostrowski; Anatol Manaenko; Kamil Duris; Jiping Tang
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 6.829

7.  An Outcome Model for Intravenous rt-PA in Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Pitchaiah Mandava; Shreyansh D Shah; Anand K Sarma; Thomas A Kent
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 6.829

Review 8.  Animal models of traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Ye Xiong; Asim Mahmood; Michael Chopp
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 34.870

9.  Intranasal Erythropoietin Protects CA1 Hippocampal Cells, Modulated by Specific Time Pattern Molecular Changes After Ischemic Damage in Rats.

Authors:  R J Macias-Velez; L Fukushima-Díaz de León; C Beas-Zárate; M C Rivera-Cervantes
Journal:  J Mol Neurosci       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 3.444

10.  Time-dependent effect of combination therapy with erythropoietin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in a mouse model of hypoxic-ischemic brain injury.

Authors:  Ji Hea Yu; Jung Hwa Seo; Jong Eun Lee; Ji Hoe Heo; Sung-Rae Cho
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 5.203

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.