S Kannan1, J T Dvonch, A J Schulz, B A Israel, G Mentz, J House, P Max, A G Reyes. 1. Department of Nutrition, 224 Chenoweth Laboratory, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts, 100 Holdsworth Way, Amherst, MA 01003, USA. srimathik@gmail.com
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Observational studies and controlled experiments have provided evidence that airborne particulate matter (PM) is capable of acutely increasing blood pressure (BP) in certain scenarios. The goal of this study was to evaluate whether and to what extent obesity and community location affect relationships between fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)) and blood pressure (BP) measures. METHODS: Using data from a stratified random sample survey of adults conducted in 2002-3 in Detroit, Michigan, we tested body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WCIR) in separate models as effect modifiers of the relationship between PM(2.5) exposure and BP. We also tested interactions with community location. Models were adjusted for covariates with established pro-hypertensive effects. RESULTS: PM(2.5) exposure was positively associated with increased pulse pressure (PP) for those categorised as obese (BMI> or =30) across lags 2 (beta 4.16, p<0.05) and 3 days (beta 2.55, p<0.05) prior to BP measure. WCIR similarly modified the effect of exposure to PM(2.5) on PP (beta 4.34, p<0.003). The observed effects were enhanced in the community with closer proximity to local emissions of PM(2.5), and for residents classified as obese (BMI> or =30) or with WCIR above high-risk cuts points. CONCLUSIONS: This community-based study suggests that positive associations between PM(2.5) exposure and PP and systolic BP are enhanced in areas proximate to sources of PM (2.5) emissions. These patterns were observed for all residents, but were more visible and consistent among those who were obese. Research is needed to examine the mechanistic pathways by which air particles interact with obesity and location to affect BP, and inform community interventions to reduce the population burden of hypertension and related co-morbidities.
BACKGROUND: Observational studies and controlled experiments have provided evidence that airborne particulate matter (PM) is capable of acutely increasing blood pressure (BP) in certain scenarios. The goal of this study was to evaluate whether and to what extent obesity and community location affect relationships between fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)) and blood pressure (BP) measures. METHODS: Using data from a stratified random sample survey of adults conducted in 2002-3 in Detroit, Michigan, we tested body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WCIR) in separate models as effect modifiers of the relationship between PM(2.5) exposure and BP. We also tested interactions with community location. Models were adjusted for covariates with established pro-hypertensive effects. RESULTS: PM(2.5) exposure was positively associated with increased pulse pressure (PP) for those categorised as obese (BMI> or =30) across lags 2 (beta 4.16, p<0.05) and 3 days (beta 2.55, p<0.05) prior to BP measure. WCIR similarly modified the effect of exposure to PM(2.5) on PP (beta 4.34, p<0.003). The observed effects were enhanced in the community with closer proximity to local emissions of PM(2.5), and for residents classified as obese (BMI> or =30) or with WCIR above high-risk cuts points. CONCLUSIONS: This community-based study suggests that positive associations between PM(2.5) exposure and PP and systolic BP are enhanced in areas proximate to sources of PM (2.5) emissions. These patterns were observed for all residents, but were more visible and consistent among those who were obese. Research is needed to examine the mechanistic pathways by which air particles interact with obesity and location to affect BP, and inform community interventions to reduce the population burden of hypertension and related co-morbidities.
Authors: B A Israel; R Lichtenstein; P Lantz; R McGranaghan; A Allen; J R Guzman; D Softley; B Maciak Journal: J Public Health Manag Pract Date: 2001-09
Authors: K Katsouyanni; G Touloumi; E Samoli; A Gryparis; A Le Tertre; Y Monopolis; G Rossi; D Zmirou; F Ballester; A Boumghar; H R Anderson; B Wojtyniak; A Paldy; R Braunstein; J Pekkanen; C Schindler; J Schwartz Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: B Hoffmann; S Moebus; S Möhlenkamp; A Stang; N Lehmann; N Dragano; A Schmermund; M Memmesheimer; K Mann; R Erbel; K-H Jöckel Journal: Circulation Date: 2007-07-16 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Wei Yue; Alexandra Schneider; Matthias Stölzel; Regina Rückerl; Josef Cyrys; Xiaochuan Pan; Wojciech Zareba; Wolfgang Koenig; H-Erich Wichmann; Annette Peters Journal: Mutat Res Date: 2007-03-01 Impact factor: 2.433
Authors: Håkan Törnqvist; Nicholas L Mills; Manuel Gonzalez; Mark R Miller; Simon D Robinson; Ian L Megson; William Macnee; Ken Donaldson; Stefan Söderberg; David E Newby; Thomas Sandström; Anders Blomberg Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2007-04-19 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Patricia D Koman; Kelly A Hogan; Natalie Sampson; Rebecca Mandell; Chris M Coombe; Myra M Tetteh; Yolanda R Hill-Ashford; Donele Wilkins; Marya G Zlatnik; Rita Loch-Caruso; Amy J Schulz; Tracey J Woodruff Journal: World Med Health Policy Date: 2018-03-12
Authors: Toby C Lewis; Thomas G Robins; Graciela B Mentz; Xiaohui Zhang; Bhramar Mukherjee; Xihong Lin; Gerald J Keeler; J Timothy Dvonch; Fuyuen Y Yip; Marie S O'Neill; Edith A Parker; Barbara A Israel; Paul T Max; Angela Reyes Journal: Sci Total Environ Date: 2012-12-27 Impact factor: 7.963
Authors: Meredith C McCormack; Andrew J Belli; Deepak A Kaji; Elizabeth C Matsui; Emily P Brigham; Roger D Peng; Cortlandt Sellers; D'Ann L Williams; Gregory B Diette; Patrick N Breysse; Nadia N Hansel Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2015-01-08 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Amy J Schulz; Graciela B Mentz; Natalie R Sampson; J Timothy Dvonch; Angela G Reyes; Betty Izumi Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-10-16 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: M L Clark; A M Bachand; J M Heiderscheidt; S A Yoder; B Luna; J Volckens; K A Koehler; S Conway; S J Reynolds; J L Peel Journal: Indoor Air Date: 2012-09-18 Impact factor: 5.770
Authors: Patricia D Koman; Frank Romo; Peter Swinton; Graciela B Mentz; Ricardo F de Majo; Natalie R Sampson; Michael J Battaglia; Kimberly Hill-Knott; Guy O Williams; Marie S O'Neill; Amy J Schulz Journal: Health Place Date: 2019-10-22 Impact factor: 4.078
Authors: Jill Baumgartner; James J Schauer; Majid Ezzati; Lin Lu; Chun Cheng; Jonathan A Patz; Leonelo E Bautista Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2011-07-01 Impact factor: 9.031