Literature DB >> 19832875

Neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy and rectal cancer: can the UK watch and wait with Brazil?

S M Nyasavajjala1, A G Shaw, A Q Khan, S R Brown, J N Lund.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: It has recently been reported that up to one-third of patients with nonmetastatic distal rectal cancer managed with neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT) had a complete clinical response (cCR) to treatment. In the selected cases, this has been used as the sole treatment. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of complete pathological response for patients receiving CRT in one centre in the UK.
METHOD: Patients receiving 6 weeks of neoadjuvant CRT were identified using the two cancer audit databases in two different tertiary hospitals from January 2002 to November 2007. Pathology was reviewed and the histopathological response of the resected specimen to CRT was evaluated using the Mandard classification (1 = complete response, 5 = no response)
RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-two consecutive patients [median age 61 (range 44-86) years, 90 men] with nonmetastatic locally advanced rectal cancer received neoadjuvant chemo radiotherapy between 2002 and 2007 followed by resection of the tumour. Data were available from 129 patients.
CONCLUSION: Only 13 out of 132 (10%) of patients had a complete pathological response. This is one-third of the cCR previously reported. Nonsurgical therapy for rectal cancer using the Habr-Gama treatment algorithm may only be effective in a very small proportion of patients with rectal cancer in the UK and nonoperative treatment would not be recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19832875     DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.02054.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  6 in total

Review 1.  Adaptive radiation dose escalation in rectal adenocarcinoma: a review.

Authors:  Jonathan D Van Wickle; Eric S Paulson; Jerome C Landry; Beth A Erickson; William A Hall
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-10

2.  Preoperative treatment does not improve the therapeutic results of abdominosacral amputation of the rectum.

Authors:  Marek Bębenek; Wiesław Tupikowski; Karol Cisarż; Alicja Balcerzak; Leszek Wojciechowski; Anna Stankowska; Radosław Tarkowski
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Evolving treatment strategies for colorectal cancer: a critical review of current therapeutic options.

Authors:  Daniel C Damin; Anderson R Lazzaron
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Risk factors for local recurrence following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancers.

Authors:  Jia-Yuan Peng; Zhong-Nan Li; Yu Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Future directions for monitoring treatment response in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Avery S Walker; Nathan P Zwintscher; Eric K Johnson; Justin A Maykel; Alexander Stojadinovic; Aviram Nissan; Itzhak Avital; Björn Ldm Brücher; Scott R Steele
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2014-01-05       Impact factor: 4.207

6.  Utility of rectoscopy in the assessment of response to neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Victor Lopez-Lopez; Jesus Abrisqueta; Juan Lujan; Quiteria Hernandez; Akiko Ono; Pascual Parrilla
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.485

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.