Literature DB >> 19830477

Intraspecific variation and interspecific differences in the bacterial and fungal assemblages of blue tit (Cyanistes caeruleus) and great tit (Parus major) nests.

Anne E Goodenough1, Bethan Stallwood.   

Abstract

Although interest in the relationship between birds and microorganisms is increasing, few studies have compared nest microbial assemblages in wild passerines to determine variation within and between species. Culturing microorganisms from blue tit (Cyanistes caeruleus) and great tit (Parus major) nests from the same study site demonstrated diverse microbial communities with 32 bacterial and 13 fungal species being isolated. Dominant bacteria were Pseudomonas fluorescens, Pseudomonas putida, and Staphylococcus hyicus. Also common in the nests were the keratinolytic bacteria Pseudomonas stutzeri and Bacillus subtilis. Dominant fungi were Cladosporium herbarum and Epicoccum purpurascens. Aspergillus flavous, Microsporum gallinae, and Candida albicans (causative agents of avian aspergillosis, favus, and candidiasis, respectively) were present in 30%, 25%, and 10% of nests, respectively. Although there were no differences in nest mass or materials, bacterial (but not fungal) loads were significantly higher in blue tit nests. Microbial species also differed interspecifically. As regards potential pathogens, the prevalence of Enterobacter cloacae was higher in blue tit nests, while Pseudomonas aeruginosa-present in 30% of blue tit nests-was absent from great tit nests. The allergenic fungus Cladosporium cladosporioides was both more prevalent and abundant in great tit nests. Using discriminant function analysis (DFA), nests were classified to avian species with 100% accuracy using the complete microbial community. Partial DFA models were created using a reduced number of variables and compared using Akaike's information criterion on the basis of model fit and parsimony. The best models classified unknown nests with 72.5-95% accuracy using a small subset of microbes (n = 1-8), which always included Pseudomonas agarici. This suggests that despite substantial intraspecific variation in nest microflora, there are significant interspecific differences-both in terms of individual microbes and the overall microbial community-even when host species are closely related, ecologically similar, sympatric, and construct very similar nests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19830477     DOI: 10.1007/s00248-009-9591-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Ecol        ISSN: 0095-3628            Impact factor:   4.552


  22 in total

1.  [The aerobic bacterial flora of songbird nests].

Authors:  U Mehmke; H Gerlach; J Kösters; S Hausmann
Journal:  Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr       Date:  1992-12

2.  Microbial diversity of wild bird feathers revealed through culture-based and culture-independent techniques.

Authors:  Matthew D Shawkey; Kimberly L Mills; Colin Dale; Geoffrey E Hill
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2005-08-18       Impact factor: 4.552

Review 3.  Why do we still use stepwise modelling in ecology and behaviour?

Authors:  Mark J Whittingham; Philip A Stephens; Richard B Bradbury; Robert P Freckleton
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.091

4.  Antifungal cyclic depsipeptide, eujavanicin A, isolated from Eupenicillium javanicum.

Authors:  Shou Nakadate; Koohei Nozawa; Hiroyasu Sato; Hitoshi Horie; Yuichi Fujii; Masahiro Nagai; Tomoo Hosoe; Ken-ichi Kawai; Takashi Yaguchi
Journal:  J Nat Prod       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 4.050

5.  Favus in a backyard flock of game chickens.

Authors:  R Droual; A A Bickford; R L Walker; S E Channing; C McFadden
Journal:  Avian Dis       Date:  1991 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.577

6.  Identification of clinical isolates of gram-negative nonfermentative bacteria by an automated cellular fatty acid identification system.

Authors:  G J Osterhout; V H Shull; J D Dick
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Bacteria isolated from the different developmental stages and larval organs of the obligate parasitic fly, Wohlfahrtia magnifica (Diptera: Sarcophagidae).

Authors:  E M Tóth; E Hell; G Kovács; A K Borsodi; K Márialigeti
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 4.552

8.  [Differentiation of staphylococci from sheep and goat milk samples].

Authors:  M Deinhofer; A Pernthaner
Journal:  Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr       Date:  1993-06

9.  The coevolutionary potential of a 'generalist' parasite, the hen flea Ceratophyllus gallinae.

Authors:  F Tripet; H Richner
Journal:  Parasitology       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.234

10.  Bacteria as an agent for change in structural plumage color: correlational and experimental evidence.

Authors:  Matthew D Shawkey; Shreekumar R Pillai; Geoffrey E Hill; Lynn M Siefferman; Sharon R Roberts
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.926

View more
  12 in total

1.  Experimental study of the effect of preen oil against feather bacteria in passerine birds.

Authors:  Grete Alt; Marko Mägi; Jaanis Lodjak; Raivo Mänd
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Manipulation of parental effort affects plumage bacterial load in a wild passerine.

Authors:  Grete Alt; Pauli Saag; Marko Mägi; Veljo Kisand; Raivo Mänd
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Toxic metals and associated sporulated bacteria on Andean hummingbird feathers.

Authors:  Esteban Góngora; Carlos Daniel Cadena; Jenny Dussán
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Differences in culturable microbial communities in bird nestboxes according to orientation and influences on offspring quality in great tits (Parus major).

Authors:  Anne E Goodenough; Bethan Stallwood
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 4.552

5.  Nest-dwelling ectoparasites reduce antioxidant defences in females and nestlings of a passerine: a field experiment.

Authors:  Jimena López-Arrabé; Alejandro Cantarero; Lorenzo Pérez-Rodríguez; Antonio Palma; Carlos Alonso-Alvarez; Sonia González-Braojos; Juan Moreno
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Dynamics of Bacterial Communities on Eggshells and on Nest Materials During Incubation in the Oriental Tit (Parus minor).

Authors:  Hokyung Song; Keesan Lee; Injae Hwang; Eunjeong Yang; Jungmoon Ha; Woojoo Kim; Sungjin Park; Hyunjoon Cho; Jae Chun Choe; Sang-Im Lee; Piotr Jablonski
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 4.552

7.  Shifts in bacterial communities of eggshells and antimicrobial activities in eggs during incubation in a ground-nesting passerine.

Authors:  Stéphanie Grizard; Maaike A Versteegh; Henry K Ndithia; Joana F Salles; B Irene Tieleman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Life history correlates of fecal bacterial species richness in a wild population of the blue tit Cyanistes caeruleus.

Authors:  Clare McW H Benskin; Glenn Rhodes; Roger W Pickup; Mark C Mainwaring; Kenneth Wilson; Ian R Hartley
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Common cuckoos (Cuculus canorus) affect the bacterial diversity of the eggshells of their great reed warbler (Acrocephalus arundinaceus) hosts.

Authors:  Nikoletta Geltsch; Zoltán Elek; László Manczinger; Csaba Vágvölgyi; Csaba Moskát
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Dynamics of bacterial and fungal communities associated with eggshells during incubation.

Authors:  Stéphanie Grizard; Francisco Dini-Andreote; B Irene Tieleman; Joana F Salles
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-03-08       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.