INTRODUCTION: Gastrointestinal perforation due to a foreign body is not unknown. The foreign body often mimics another cause of acute abdomen and requires emergency surgical intervention. The majority of patients do not recall ingesting the foreign body. Perforations have been reported to occur in a pathologically abnormal colon. CASE PRESENTATION: We report an interesting case of a 47-year-old Caucasian man who had a perforation of the sigmoid colon caused by an ingested chicken bone mimicking acute appendicitis. Our patient presented with right iliac fossa pain and local tenderness. When a laparotomy was performed, a chicken bone was found protruding through the sigmoid colon, which was found to lie in the right iliac fossa, thus mimicking acute appendicitis. Our case is different from previously reported cases in that perforation occurred in a non-pathological colon. CONCLUSION: Our case emphasises the fact that the operating surgeon has to be aware of various differential diagnostic possibilities which mimic acute appendicitis. This has implications on the training of junior surgeons who are often involved in performing these procedures, and may do so out of hours. Care needs to be taken while obtaining consent for the necessary operation.
INTRODUCTION: Gastrointestinal perforation due to a foreign body is not unknown. The foreign body often mimics another cause of acute abdomen and requires emergency surgical intervention. The majority of patients do not recall ingesting the foreign body. Perforations have been reported to occur in a pathologically abnormal colon. CASE PRESENTATION: We report an interesting case of a 47-year-old Caucasian man who had a perforation of the sigmoid colon caused by an ingested chicken bone mimicking acute appendicitis. Our patient presented with right iliac fossa pain and local tenderness. When a laparotomy was performed, a chicken bone was found protruding through the sigmoid colon, which was found to lie in the right iliac fossa, thus mimicking acute appendicitis. Our case is different from previously reported cases in that perforation occurred in a non-pathological colon. CONCLUSION: Our case emphasises the fact that the operating surgeon has to be aware of various differential diagnostic possibilities which mimic acute appendicitis. This has implications on the training of junior surgeons who are often involved in performing these procedures, and may do so out of hours. Care needs to be taken while obtaining consent for the necessary operation.
Authors: E Vardaki; V Maniatis; H Chrisikopoulos; A Papadopoulos; A Roussakis; S Kavadias; K Stringaris Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Angeliki Theodoropoulou; Maria Roussomoustakaki; Manolis N Michalodimitrakis; Catherine Kanaki; Elias A Kouroumalis Journal: Lancet Date: 2002-03-16 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Seyfi Emir; Zeynep Ozkan; Hasan Baki Altınsoy; Fatih Mehmet Yazar; Selim Sözen; Ilhan Bali Journal: World J Clin Cases Date: 2013-10-16 Impact factor: 1.337
Authors: Faton T Hoxha; Shemsedin I Hashani; Driton S Komoni; Lumturije H Gashi-Luci; Fisnik I Kurshumliu; Medita Sh Hashimi; Avdyl S Krasniqi Journal: Cases J Date: 2009-01-19