PURPOSE: We tested the efficacy of dual targeting of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and the alpha(V)beta(3) integrin in orthotopic mouse models of ovarian cancer. RESULTS: In the SKOV3ip1 model, both single-agent bevacizumab and etaracizumab reduced tumor growth by 52-63% (p < 0.05), while combined therapy reduced growth by 63-74% compared to either agent alone (p < 0.05). Furthermore, bevacizumab/paclitaxel was superior to paclitaxel alone (weight reduction by 53%, p < 0.05), but etaracizumab/paclitaxel was not. Combining all three agents was more effective than either agent with paclitaxel (p < 0.05). Significantly, both bevacizumab and etaracizumab each sensitized the taxane-resistant SKOV3TRip2 cells to paclitaxel, reducing growth by 56-73% (p < 0.05). Both agents decreased proliferation and microvessel density, and increased apoptosis, alone and in combination with paclitaxel. In the HeyA8 model, there was significantly reduced growth with bevacizumab treatment, but not with etaracizumab, and combination therapy was not superior to bevacizumab alone. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: In vivo therapy experiments were conducted in chemo-sensitive (SKOV3ip1, HeyA8) and -resistant (SKOV3TRip2) ovarian cancer models. VEGF was targeted with bevacizumab and alpha(V)beta(3) with etaracizumab. Mice were treated with each agent alone, together, or in combination with paclitaxel for assessment of tumor growth. Tumor specimens were tested for proliferative index, microvessel density and apoptosis. CONCLUSIONS: Bevacizumab and etaracizumab are more effective in combination than individually in some ovarian cancer models, but not all. Both can sensitize taxane-resistant ovarian cancer cells to paclitaxel, though bevacizumab was superior to etaracizumab in this regard. Further study of this dual anti-angiogenic therapy is warranted.
PURPOSE: We tested the efficacy of dual targeting of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and the alpha(V)beta(3) integrin in orthotopic mouse models of ovarian cancer. RESULTS: In the SKOV3ip1 model, both single-agent bevacizumab and etaracizumab reduced tumor growth by 52-63% (p < 0.05), while combined therapy reduced growth by 63-74% compared to either agent alone (p < 0.05). Furthermore, bevacizumab/paclitaxel was superior to paclitaxel alone (weight reduction by 53%, p < 0.05), but etaracizumab/paclitaxel was not. Combining all three agents was more effective than either agent with paclitaxel (p < 0.05). Significantly, both bevacizumab and etaracizumab each sensitized the taxane-resistant SKOV3TRip2 cells to paclitaxel, reducing growth by 56-73% (p < 0.05). Both agents decreased proliferation and microvessel density, and increased apoptosis, alone and in combination with paclitaxel. In the HeyA8 model, there was significantly reduced growth with bevacizumab treatment, but not with etaracizumab, and combination therapy was not superior to bevacizumab alone. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: In vivo therapy experiments were conducted in chemo-sensitive (SKOV3ip1, HeyA8) and -resistant (SKOV3TRip2) ovarian cancer models. VEGF was targeted with bevacizumab and alpha(V)beta(3) with etaracizumab. Mice were treated with each agent alone, together, or in combination with paclitaxel for assessment of tumor growth. Tumor specimens were tested for proliferative index, microvessel density and apoptosis. CONCLUSIONS:Bevacizumab and etaracizumab are more effective in combination than individually in some ovarian cancer models, but not all. Both can sensitize taxane-resistant ovarian cancer cells to paclitaxel, though bevacizumab was superior to etaracizumab in this regard. Further study of this dual anti-angiogenic therapy is warranted.
Authors: Limin Hu; Judith Hofmann; Charles Zaloudek; Napoleone Ferrara; Thomas Hamilton; Robert B Jaffe Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: J C Gutheil; T N Campbell; P R Pierce; J D Watkins; W D Huse; D J Bodkin; D A Cheresh Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2000-08 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Brian C Cooper; Justine M Ritchie; Carrie L W Broghammer; Jeremy Coffin; Joel I Sorosky; Richard E Buller; Mary J C Hendrix; Anil K Sood Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Robert A Burger; Michael W Sill; Bradley J Monk; Benjamin E Greer; Joel I Sorosky Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-11-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Herbert Hurwitz; Louis Fehrenbacher; William Novotny; Thomas Cartwright; John Hainsworth; William Heim; Jordan Berlin; Ari Baron; Susan Griffing; Eric Holmgren; Napoleone Ferrara; Gwen Fyfe; Beth Rogers; Robert Ross; Fairooz Kabbinavar Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-06-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: H Wildiers; G Guetens; G De Boeck; E Verbeken; B Landuyt; W Landuyt; E A de Bruijn; A T van Oosterom Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2003-06-16 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Yan Huang; Lenard M Lichtenberger; Morgan Taylor; Justin N Bottsford-Miller; Monika Haemmerle; Michael J Wagner; Yasmin Lyons; Sunila Pradeep; Wei Hu; Rebecca A Previs; Jean M Hansen; Dexing Fang; Piotr L Dorniak; Justyna Filant; Elizabeth J Dial; Fangrong Shen; Hiroto Hatakeyama; Anil K Sood Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2016-09-16 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Murali K Ravoori; Masato Nishimura; Sheela P Singh; Chunhua Lu; Lin Han; Brian P Hobbs; Sunila Pradeep; Hyun J Choi; James A Bankson; Anil K Sood; Vikas Kundra Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-06-22 Impact factor: 3.240