Literature DB >> 19828670

Destroyed documents: uncovering the science that Imperial Tobacco Canada sought to conceal.

David Hammond1, Michael Chaiton, Alex Lee, Neil Collishaw.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 1992, British American Tobacco had its Canadian affiliate, Imperial Tobacco Canada, destroy internal research documents that could expose the company to liability or embarrassment. Sixty of these destroyed documents were subsequently uncovered in British American Tobacco's files.
METHODS: Legal counsel for Imperial Tobacco Canada provided a list of 60 destroyed documents to British American Tobacco. Information in this list was used to search for copies of the documents in British American Tobacco files released through court disclosure. We reviewed and summarized this information.
RESULTS: Imperial Tobacco destroyed documents that included evidence from scientific reviews prepared by British American Tobacco's researchers, as well as 47 original research studies, 35 of which examined the biological activity and carcinogenicity of tobacco smoke. The documents also describe British American Tobacco research on cigarette modifications and toxic emissions, including the ways in which consumers adapted their smoking behaviour in response to these modifications. The documents also depict a comprehensive research program on the pharmacology of nicotine and the central role of nicotine in smoking behaviour. British American Tobacco scientists noted that ".. the present scale of the tobacco industry is largely dependent on the intensity and nature of the pharmacological action of nicotine," and that "... should nicotine become less attractive to smokers, the future of the tobacco industry would become less secure."
INTERPRETATION: The scientific evidence contained in the documents destroyed by Imperial Tobacco demonstrates that British American Tobacco had collected evidence that cigarette smoke was carcinogenic and addictive. The evidence that Imperial Tobacco sought to destroy had important implications for government regulation of tobacco.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19828670      PMCID: PMC2774364          DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.080566

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  6 in total

1.  Out of the ashes: the life, death, and rebirth of the "safer" cigarette in the United States.

Authors:  Amy Fairchild; James Colgrove
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  The whole truth and nothing but the truth? The research that Philip Morris did not want you to see.

Authors:  Pascal A Diethelm; Jean-Charles Rielle; Martin McKee
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Jul 2-8       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Prying open the door to the tobacco industry's secrets about nicotine: the Minnesota Tobacco Trial.

Authors:  R D Hurt; C R Robertson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-10-07       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Secret science: tobacco industry research on smoking behaviour and cigarette toxicity.

Authors:  David Hammond; Neil E Collishaw; Cynthia Callard
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-03-04       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Lawyer control of internal scientific research to protect against products liability lawsuits. The Brown and Williamson documents.

Authors:  P Hanauer; J Slade; D E Barnes; L Bero; S A Glantz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-07-19       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  The shredding of BAT's defence: McCabe v British American Tobacco Australia.

Authors:  J Liberman
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 7.552

  6 in total
  4 in total

1.  Tobacco lawsuits.

Authors:  Neil Collishaw
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Evidence Regarding the Impact of Conflicts of Interest on Environmental and Occupational Health Research.

Authors:  Ellen M Wells
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2017-06

3.  Tobacco and the escalating global cancer burden.

Authors:  Richard F Oppeltz; Ismail Jatoi
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 4.375

4.  Analysis of British American Tobacco's questionable use of privilege and protected document claims at the Guildford Depository.

Authors:  Eric LeGresley; Kelley Lee
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 7.552

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.