Literature DB >> 19827091

Developing reference data for nerve conduction studies: an application of quantile regression.

Limin Peng1, Joanne Wuu, Michael Benatar.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The interpretation of nerve conduction studies, as with any diagnostic test, requires an ability to differentiate normal from abnormal. To this end there have been many efforts to establish reference or normative data, but they have been hampered by a variety of methodological shortcomings. The goal of this article is to introduce a statistical method known as quantile regression, which we contend is better suited than existing methods to generate reference data, especially when there is a need to adjust for covariates.
METHODS: Statistical methods previously used for generation of reference data are reviewed. Quantile regression is presented and used to estimate the lower percentiles for response amplitudes of the radial sensory and tibial motor nerves.
RESULTS: Using data from 190 subjects, it is possible to estimate as low as the 2nd percentile for the radial nerve. Using data from 99 subjects it is possible to estimate as low as the 4th percentile for the tibial nerve. Percentile estimation for both nerves required adjustment for age, but no other covariates. DISCUSSION: Quantile regression is well suited to the estimation of extreme percentiles, the very percentiles that are most relevant to reference data. It is also less dependent on data distribution and permits covariate adjustment, even for continuous variables such as age, which are clinically important determinants of reference data for nerve conduction studies. We recommend the use of quantile regression for future studies of reference data.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19827091     DOI: 10.1002/mus.21489

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Muscle Nerve        ISSN: 0148-639X            Impact factor:   3.217


  3 in total

1.  Difference in normal limit values of nerve conduction parameters between Westerners and Japanese people might need to be considered when diagnosing diabetic polyneuropathy using a Point-of-Care Sural Nerve Conduction Device (NC-stat®/DPNCheck™).

Authors:  Kazuhiro Hirayasu; Hideyuki Sasaki; Shohei Kishimoto; Seigo Kurisu; Koji Noda; Kenichi Ogawa; Hiroto Tanaka; Yumiko Sakakibara; Shohei Matsuno; Hiroto Furuta; Mikio Arita; Keigo Naka; Kishio Nanjo
Journal:  J Diabetes Investig       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 4.232

2.  Developing Normative Reference Values for Nerve Conduction Studies of Commonly Tested Nerves among a Sample Pakistani Population.

Authors:  Zaitoon Shivji; Anita Jabeen; Safia Awan; Sara Khan
Journal:  J Neurosci Rural Pract       Date:  2019 Apr-Jun

3.  Reference values of upper extremity nerve conduction studies in a Colombian population.

Authors:  Enrique A Esteves; Sandra P Guio; Carlos A de Los Reyes-Guevara; Erika Cantor; Miguel E Habeych; Adriana L Malagón
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol Pract       Date:  2020-03-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.