Literature DB >> 19826361

Biomarker-driven early clinical trials in oncology: a paradigm shift in drug development.

Daniel S W Tan1, George V Thomas, Michelle D Garrett, Udai Banerji, Johann S de Bono, Stan B Kaye, Paul Workman.   

Abstract

Early clinical trials represent a crucial bridge between preclinical drug discovery and the especially resource-intense randomized phase III trial-the definitive regulatory hurdle for drug approval. High attrition rates and rising costs, when coupled with the extraordinary opportunities opened up by cancer genomics and the promise of personalized medicine call for new approaches in the conduct and design of phase I/II trials. The key challenge lies in increasing the odds for successful and efficient transition of a compound through the drug development pipeline. The incorporation of scientifically and analytically validated biomarkers into rationally designed hypothesis-testing clinical trials offers a promising way forward to achieving this objective. In this article, we provide an overview of biomarkers in early clinical trials, including examples where they have been particularly successful, and the caveats and pitfalls associated with indiscriminate application. We describe the use of pharmacodynamic end points to demonstrate the proof of modulation of target, pathway, and biologic effect, as well as predictive biomarkers for patient selection and trial enrichment. Establishing the pharmacologic audit trail provides a means to assess and manage risk in a drug development program and thus increases the rationality of the decision-making process. Accurate preclinical models are important for pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic-efficacy modeling and biomarker validation. The degree of scientific and analytical validation should ensure that biomarkers are fit-for purpose, according to the stage of development and the impact on the trial; specifically they are either exploratory or used to make decisions within the trial. To be maximally useful at an early stage, these must be in place before the commencement of phase I trials. Validation and qualification of biomarkers then continues through clinical development. We highlight the impact of modern technology platforms, such as genomics, proteomics, circulating tumor cells, and minimally invasive functional and molecular imaging, with respect to their potential role in improving the success rate and speed of drug development and in interrogating the consequences of therapeutic intervention and providing a unique insight into human disease biology. With these technologies already having an impact in the clinic today, we predict that further future advances will come from the application of network analysis to clinical trials, leading to individualized systems-based medicine for cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19826361     DOI: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e3181bd0445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer J        ISSN: 1528-9117            Impact factor:   3.360


  48 in total

1.  Consensus recommendations for current treatments and accelerating clinical trials for patients with neurofibromatosis type 2.

Authors:  Jaishri O Blakeley; D Gareth Evans; John Adler; Derald Brackmann; Ruihong Chen; Rosalie E Ferner; C Oliver Hanemann; Gordon Harris; Susan M Huson; Abraham Jacob; Michel Kalamarides; Matthias A Karajannis; Bruce R Korf; Victor-Felix Mautner; Andrea I McClatchey; Harry Miao; Scott R Plotkin; William Slattery; Anat O Stemmer-Rachamimov; D Bradley Welling; Patrick Y Wen; Brigitte Widemann; Kim Hunter-Schaedle; Marco Giovannini
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 2.802

Review 2.  Integrating biobanks: addressing the practical and ethical issues to deliver a valuable tool for cancer research.

Authors:  R William G Watson; Elaine W Kay; David Smith
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 3.  Envisioning the future of early anticancer drug development.

Authors:  Timothy A Yap; Shahneen K Sandhu; Paul Workman; Johann S de Bono
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 60.716

4.  Analysis of Impact of Post-Treatment Biopsies in Phase I Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Randy F Sweis; Michael W Drazer; Mark J Ratain
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Biomarker discovery and clinical proteomics.

Authors:  Jerzy Silberring; Pawel Ciborowski
Journal:  Trends Analyt Chem       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 12.296

Review 6.  Utilizing targeted cancer therapeutic agents in combination: novel approaches and urgent requirements.

Authors:  Shivanni Kummar; Helen X Chen; John Wright; Susan Holbeck; Myrtle Davis Millin; Joseph Tomaszewski; James Zweibel; Jerry Collins; James H Doroshow
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 7.  DNA repair and personalized breast cancer therapy.

Authors:  Shu-Xia Li; Ashley Sjolund; Lyndsay Harris; Joann B Sweasy
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2010 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 3.216

8.  Anticancer activity of the type I insulin-like growth factor receptor antagonist, ganitumab, in combination with the death receptor 5 agonist, conatumumab.

Authors:  Josep Tabernero; Sant P Chawla; Hedy Kindler; Karen Reckamp; E Gabriela Chiorean; Nilofer S Azad; A Craig Lockhart; Cheng-Pang Hsu; Nigel F Baker; Francesco Galimi; Pedro Beltran; José Baselga
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2014-05-11       Impact factor: 4.493

9.  Molecular image-directed biopsies: improving clinical biopsy selection in patients with multiple tumors.

Authors:  Stephanie A Harmon; Michael J Tuite; Robert Jeraj
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 10.  Fit-for-purpose biomarker method validation for application in clinical trials of anticancer drugs.

Authors:  J Cummings; F Raynaud; L Jones; R Sugar; C Dive
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.