Literature DB >> 19826358

Progression-free survival: gaining on overall survival as a gold standard and accelerating drug development.

David Lebwohl1, Andrea Kay, William Berg, Jean Francois Baladi, Ji Zheng.   

Abstract

In clinical trials of oncology drugs, overall survival (OS) is a direct measure of clinical efficacy and is considered the gold standard primary efficacy end point. The purpose of this study was to discuss the difficulties in using OS as a primary efficacy end point in the setting of evolving cancer therapies. We suggest that progression-free survival is an appropriate efficacy end point in many types of cancer, specifically those for which OS is expected to be prolonged and for which subsequent treatments are expected to affect OS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19826358     DOI: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e3181b9c5ec

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer J        ISSN: 1528-9117            Impact factor:   3.360


  18 in total

Review 1.  Benefit-risk assessment of bevacizumab in the treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Rodrigo Dienstmann; Felipe Ades; Kamal S Saini; Otto Metzger-Filho
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 2.  Targeted therapies for renal cell carcinoma: understanding their impact on survival.

Authors:  Sumanta Kumar Pal; Robert A Figlin
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 4.493

Review 3.  Targeted therapies for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: clinical evidence.

Authors:  Thomas E Hutson
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011

4.  Failing to improve overall survival because post-protocol survival is long: fact, myth, excuse or improper study design?

Authors:  Vinay Prasad; Andrae Vandross
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 5.  Targeted therapies in neuroendocrine tumors (NET): clinical trial challenges and lessons learned.

Authors:  James C Yao; Diane Reidy Lagunes; Matthew H Kulke
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-04-24

6.  Reporting trends of outcome measures in phase II and phase III trials conducted in advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Saurav Ghimire; Eunjung Kyung; Eunyoung Kim
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 2.584

7.  The imaging viewpoint: how imaging affects determination of progression-free survival.

Authors:  Daniel Carl Sullivan; Lawrence H Schwartz; Binsheng Zhao
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 8.  Use of Intermediate Endpoints in the Economic Evaluation of New Treatments for Advanced Cancer and Methods Adopted When Suitable Overall Survival Data are Not Available.

Authors:  Catherine Beauchemin; Marie-Ève Lapierre; Nathalie Letarte; Louise Yelle; Jean Lachaine
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 9.  Issues surrounding clinical trial endpoints in solid malignancies with a focus on metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Edward B Garon
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 5.705

10.  Cancer symptom response as an oncology clinical trial end point.

Authors:  Laura C Bouchard; Neil Aaronson; Kathleen Gondek; David Cella
Journal:  Expert Rev Qual Life Cancer Care       Date:  2018-06-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.